[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]Powerpuff wrote:
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]Powerpuff wrote:
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]Powerpuff wrote:
About talking about your negative experiences, the prevailing idea for years was that people need to “get it all out” in order to move on and heal. Talk about it. Vent. Maybe engage in some primal scream therapy - I’m rolling my eyes here. Of course, that isn’t always true. Some people do really well just going about their lives, without the need to relive it, talk about it, or focus on all the sad or traumatic stuff.
[/quote]
I think I’ve seen some neuroplasticity-oriented stuff that claims that talking about trauma changes the way it is stored in the brain (and thus the ways in which it affects the victim).[/quote]
Fascinating. Some the the research coming out on memory is pretty wild. It makes you wonder how much of what you “remember” is real. The brain is so capable of filling in detail, merging events, and just all kinds of error. We know emotional state and even hormones can effect memory storage in profound ways. No three people will remember an event quite the same, and often they will be way off in important ways. Scary, since we place a lot of emphasis on eye-witness accounts in our legal system.
[/quote]
Reminds of the old studies where a person has the connection between the hemispheres (corpus callusom??) broken so that what the right side knows is unknown to the left. When info is therefore not passed on, the “uninformed” side will often make up reasons for behavior carried out because of what the “informed” side knew. [/quote]
Off topic a bit, but it reminded me of this. Remember the famous case of Sybil, the woman with supposed multiple personality? A situation where an unethical therapist used sodium pentothol to and psychoanalysis to “help” her client remember childhood trauma. I was blow away when I read this about how it was all manufactured.
Chushin, what’s your field?
[/quote]
Used to work in mental health (or actually, illness, ha ha!).
Current field is unrelated.
Aren’t you on G+ ? If so, I can share more there…
[/quote]
I’m going to guess by your opaque answer, that you are now working on a top secret assignment for the government and so you can’t disclose too much here because it might jeopardize national security. What a coincidence! Me too! That’s why I’m not on G+.
Seriously, the reason I’m not on G+ is because in real life I’m a dude, and nobody is impressed with my nearly body weight bench. 
Max - Peacock away my friend.
Edgy - Crazy? The technical term is “one taco short of a combination plate.”