You’ve mistaken a disagreement with the author as a personal attack. You return with a volley of your own.
I stated my racial issues with the author, and pretty much the elitist left. Is that not allowed in a discussion?
Evidently the only ones allowed to partake in this ‘discussion’ are those that either agree with you and the author, or those that are very sedate and well behaved in their dissent.
What is it that you consider racism? What constitutes a racist? You’ve admitted that it is a two way street. Can a black man, or hispanic, or a gay man be convicted of a hate crime? Can they be sued by the EEOC? Does my son have a chance in hell of playing football for Grambling?
[quote]rainjack wrote:
You’ve mistaken a disagreement with the author as a personal attack. You return with a volley of your own.
I stated my racial issues with the author, and pretty much the elitist left. Is that not allowed in a discussion?
Evidently the only ones allowed to partake in this ‘discussion’ are those that either agree with you and the author, or those that are very sedate and well behaved in their dissent.
What is it that you consider racism? What constitutes a racist? You’ve admitted that it is a two way street. Can a black man, or hispanic, or a gay man be convicted of a hate crime? Can they be sued by the EEOC? Does my son have a chance in hell of playing football for Grambling?
[/quote]
rainjack:
Don’t you get it? If you are against quotas you are a racist! If you are not in favor of gay marriage you are a homophobe. If oppose abortion you are a woman hater. Like to hunt? Simple your a “gun nut” or a whacko right wing something or other…
If I cared to expend the energy I’m sure I could find the shades of grey that would puncture may of your (fact finding) points. At any rate I am certain that if Kerry had won four years from now I would still be hunting with my favorite elk rifle… legally!"
Brother Elk, IF you want to be taken seriously, you might want to say, “good point” once in a while. Nice points, JD430. Brother Elk challenged you to produce evidence and you did so. Kerry’s record is in the public for all to see. It should be obvious to all. Hell, he even set up a photo shoot in Ohio where he shot a few geese to reassure the more discerning Democrats (not Brother Elk) that he was “Pro-Gun.” Trouble was, he voted against the shotgun he was using!!!
What an insulting candidate/campaign.
JD430, please understand that you scored points on my friend Elk. Want evidence? His only response was to give you his “hunch” that he would still be hunting after four years of a “Kerry Administration.” You produced facts, he gave you feelings.
[quote]vroom wrote:
I think if he wanted to say “republicans are racist” he would simply say it.[/quote]
I’ll just do this one point here, and let you off the hook. Everybody else has heckled you enough. I would posit that if he (our esteemed Dr. Zeleza) wanted to call the Repubs racists, he would do it in a roundabout way, to make it sound not so much like name-calling, but he would still set a tone of definitely tying the two together. In other words, he would write it in such a way that he would seem educated and elite… above reproach in his conclusions. You fell for it, buddy.
