You forgot the supposed prominent “Beau Biden Foundation” sticker on the laptop, which drove the responsible citizen that is the repair shop owner to look into the e-mails on the computer.
I guess then we can all agree that it would be an unmitigated disaster if a person holding the highest office in the land owed the state owned Bank of China a cool 211 million.
Why not? It was his computer. Certainly a person has the right to look at their own computer? It ceased being Biden’s when he forgot to pick it up after 90 days.
I care more about what China owes him and for what.
It was a pretty direct answer. You asked me why didn’t Biden say something if it wasn’t true, and why he shut down his travel. Then you said their silence was suspicious.
I couldn’t tell if it was rhetorical question or not, but I answered that their consideration was probably that the more he talked about it the more news cycle would stick on it and that they would probably hurt themselves more than help. Pretty straight forward
What exactly are you basing this on? The story is filled with red flags which have been pointed out numerous times on here.
As of right now we don’t know anything concrete and you’re acting like the whole thing is a slam dunk. Because you really want the whole thing to be a slam dunk. Your candidate needs it to be. Which should give you even more pause (not less) considering the sources and timing.
Without discussing your reply to which I have no answer (personally dont think they reveal some untoward ‘influence’, but perhaps less business acumen than bragged about for years), my somewhat rhetorical statement/question is why is no one else is able to originate charge after charge except NYT.