Here is an enigma: if the “alleged” reason
the WTC buildings collapsed was the fire,
then why is it that the building that was
hit second, and had a fire going for far
less time, collapse first; and the building
that was hit first, which had a fire going
for a much longer time collapsed second. This
just doesn’t make any sense. Like I said in
the pentagon topic - something definitely
doesn’t smell right here. Where is the true
independent investigation? Or does the
propoganda now rule all?