There is absolutely no chance her meeting with Bill was only about their grandchildren
3 Likes
Hah ha well that is a pretty good guess for certain. But, one would think that the smarter thing to do would have been to pick up the phone thus avoiding the personal appearance and all that comes with being spotted.
Aside from that will Obama allow Lynch to now accept an FBI recommendation for indictment, or will he replace her with someone else before the end of the investigation?
I appreciate the question to facilitate the conversation…and if you want my guess it’s yes… but that is not based off any information relevant enough to make it an educated guess.
I’ll sit back and watch it play out, the fact that she came out ahead of the recomendation shows that there is cause for concern. Prepare the popcorn.
Pushharder goldbar.jpg
I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised that the guy that adores Donald Trump thinks this way.
1 Like
If Comey recommends an indictment and Lynch accepts it and it is after the democrat convention we will have another first. A candidate for President under indictment.
1 Like
There is a better chance of the Earth falling out of orbit than for the pant suit getting indicted, but I have been wrong before.
2 Likes
Well, according to Lynch she is now going to accept whatever recommendation that FBI Director Comey recommends. Prior to that announcement I would have agreed with you. But now, while I always thought there would be a recommendation for indictment I never thought it would go beyond that. Now I’m not so sure.
The comparison I see floating around - their debating whether someone on a terror watch list should be allowed to acquire a gun but not whether someone who is under investigation from the FBI should be allowed to run for president
Are you saying the USA has not done well as a nation? To me, becoming the world’s largest economy, military power, and cultural influence points towards success. I’m not saying things are perfect, but the USA has certainly done very well for itself. What would you measure the success of a nation by if not those? Even Trump implies America was great.
I also notice you ignored the other parts of the post… Tax returns, Trump’s foreign policy knowledge, and his mishandling of numerous issues… I’m assuming that is because you acknowledge there is no debate about it.
What I find funny is, Bam and his Admin are blaming her, when in fact I have no doubt this meeting was Bill’s idea. This meeting was Bill trying to impose influence/intimidation on Lynch, with no care for how it’s perceived in the public view.
So you have the Left throwing a black woman under the bus in order to preserve an old white man’s legacy.
1 Like
I’m curious to see what that means (if it happens). Do they let her continue? Would the DNC change rules and have a another vote? Biden? Sanders? I honestly don’t have the slightest idea.
1 Like
lol I hadn’t thought about it this way. What a crazy political year.
1 Like
You would see a Biden/Warren ticket. A man who has no idea where he is, with a woman who has no idea who she is.
Seriously, the two of them together would look like a commercial for AARP.
3 Likes
You meant from the beginning not recently?
The US is is filled with bad foreign affair decisions post WW2
Ok? Thanks for your opinion, but that is not what we were talking about…
Follow along: Zeb said Trump was inexperienced, you pointed out that was a good thing, I’m saying that he would be the only president in the history of the USA who has not held political office or a military position. Up to this point (from the beginning as you put it), that has worked quite well for the USA. Trump is a BIG change from something that has worked for a long time, and as I said, “Trump is certainly lacking in any governing, foreign policy, federal budget, or really anything related to the job he’s actually going for. Inexperienced is a nice way of putting it. Grossly incompetent at the skills necessary for the job might be another.” I’m not sure what you base your feelings on that that is a good thing. I certainly don’t want the US to become Trump’s next failed business venture.
Yes a country thats 20 trillion dollars in debt and constantly engaging in failed wars is doing "well’.
definitely wouldn’t want a change.
Not if the indictment came down after the democrats held their national convention. The nominee, Hillary Clinton would continue to run. Unless she stepped down and walked away, and Clintons never do that, she is their nominee for better or for worse.
I have to disagree with you here at least somewhat, Dems can’t have a candidate facing Federal charges and still expect to win the White House. Between pleas and convictions, the Feds win over 90% of the time, but we are talking about Hillary so who knows.
At the same time, they can’t have a candidate run for POTUS who millions of their voters didn’t vote for in their primary. That’s a tough circle for them to square either way.
1 Like
I’m not talking about not changing, I’m talking about having a president who actually knows how to handle issues that he would face, two of which you highlighted. How does Trump address that? How does his experience lend you to think he has even the slightest clue of what to do about those problems? He is inexperienced and incompetent regarding those areas, which is my point. His inexperience is NOT A GOOD THING. I shouldn’t have to keep clarifying my point. Never once did I say that there should be no change.
He was one of the only republican candidates who won’t talk about entitlement reform, a balanced budget amendment, or specifics on what he would do with foreign policy. I want those problems fixed, which is exactly why I don’t want Trump. If the debt and failed wars are your main concern, Gary Johnson is your medicine, not Trump.
1 Like