The Next President of the United States: IV

So instead of articulating your argument and backing it up with facts, it is everybody else’s responsibility to sit through 45 minutes of right-wing trash propoganda and discredit all the points…where you will pivot, change the topic, and disregard as you have every time somebody makes a well reasoned argument against you. Again, why are you surprised you are getting laughed at.

So what is your answer? Why is it ok for you, an immigrant, to change our culture when the main problem (from your point of view) of immigration is how it changes the culture? Dave Chappelle needs to make a skit about you. The immigrant who hates immigration. Even writing that makes me laugh.

2 Likes

Push, Beans, varqanir, etc… have all started a post with lol…

It’s a message board where people use short-hand, get over it.

4 Posting a link to this guy:

While brushing aside statements made by a Yale graduate with a Ph.D. in History on a discussion centered on history…

You’re citing a public speech act by Putin - a former KGB Colonel and Former director of the FSB, one of the Russian security agencies whose computational methods and tools have been identified with high confidence as those behind the leaks - as evidence that Russia is not interfering in American domestic politics?

Still waiting on a response to this.

False, I’ve never asked you this. If you think so, just repost your reply.

If you’re uninterested in watching the video that’s fine, but what kind of idiot trashes it without even watching it? You even called it propaganda without even watching it yourself.

It’s not my responsibility to answer the same questions over and over. Go through the previous threads if you’re so inclined for my answer.

I don’t think there’s enough evidence to say it’s the Russian who leaked it conclusively. It’s very much just a dodge by the DNC to throw the scent off their corruption

It’s like the shittest episode of the Twilight Zone has been stuck on rerun for the last year and a half.

3 Likes

Get your memory checked old man

Yep and we gave those 3 the :boot:

The number of posters has sure dropped in here in the last year or so

1 Like

Ehh, posters come and go, but those were some of the best… (Can I put a sad face or is that too immature for this group?)

2 Likes

People who start their posts with “wow” or “lol” aren’t necessarily stupid, it’s just a tell that they have nothing to offer to the discussion at hand

Or perhaps it’s just a way to offer a context clue as to how their post should be taken…

Heh. Makes sense. I’d chicken out if I were you, too.

How old are you anyway?
One doesn’t see that many 3 corner hats really,

Four reputable cyber security firms - CrowdStrike, Fidelis Cybersecurity, ThreatConnect, and Mandiant - attributed the hack to Russian intelligence services through cyber-forensics. The same malware and associated servers were used as previous attacks that have been conclusively attributed to Russian state actors. The U.S. intelligence community - the most sophisticated in history - has also concluded with high confidence that the FSB and GRU were behind the attacks based on scientific evidence.

We know. Oh wait, I’ll let you finish.

Hey, but raj doesn’t think so, get out of here with your science and facts and stuff.

1 Like
1 Like

Based on how much the DNC has been caught cheating would it all be surprising they paid off these companies to state as such?

Also ever read Guccifers blog?

You’ve twice quoted the accused to evidence your argument.

Claim: Russia is behind the Wikileaks hacks targeting the DNC and HRC.

You: Na-uh! Here’s Putin (former spymaster of the implicated agency) saying he didn’t do it!

Guccifer? You’re citing the blog post of an operative implicated in the attacks? The “Romanian” hacker that couldn’t speak Romanian when questioned by a reporter in that language? He’s a Russian intelligence operative.