The Next President of the United States: IV

And among officers, Johnson is way out in front.

2 Likes

I find this part even more interesting:

1 Like

I, of course, have no illusions about Johnson winning, but it’s interesting that members of our esteemed military - particularly the officer class - are refusing to back Trump against Hillary, even at this late stage of the election.

With these numbers in favor of Johnson, will these folks be slandered as stealth Hillary supporters or traitors to the Constitution by the Trumpkins?

2 Likes

Scott adams says the election is over and based on the tone of Hillary in this clip she knows it

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/150772972746/how-to-know-an-election-is-over

Strikes me that the Military likes money and manpower for readiness, but is tired of 25+ years of actual fighting. That is understandable - what bouncer, policeman, soldier wants to fight, kill, or die; as opposed to mostly just training ?

But hasn’t GJ called for large reductions in force (20+%)? Just seems odd to vote to eliminate your vocation.

“In the 3D world of persuasion…”

“Ignore the content of what she says, because no one cares about content. Just feel it. And see the future.”

Good God you loopy alt-right buffoons are pitiable.

1 Like

I thought it was closer to 50% cut to spending across the board, including military. Maybe closer to 40, but definitely significant.

That’s hardheaded analysis from a SME. That’s all she wrote folks. Trump is going to be president because a goddamn cartoonist has asserted so from the hip.

I’m sitting here scratching my head wondering why I’m supposed to care what the creator of Dilbert thinks…

I guess I better listen to Colin Kaepernick for ongoing social issues… :pokerface:

1 Like

Gents, Adams is a Brigadier General in Joint Master Persuasion Operations Command Detachment Delta. He is a certified, heliotrope-belt hypnotist with advanced degrees in Subliminal Doodling and Differential Shit-Peddling. Much like God (or, if you prefer, Matthew McConaughey in Interstellar), he has literally trancended the dimension of facts and now occupies the higher dimension of pure persuasion.

Show some respect.

3 Likes

He did say 43% back in 2012. In his words, take 4 of 10(sic) carrier groups out of service.

He said 20% of reduction across the board now, so who knows how much his military reduction is %. I don’t want to look cuz I’m lazy.

http://2016.presidential-candidates.org/Johnson/?on=deficit-debt

This is the site, but I only glanced at the one page.

1 Like

biography shows:
Valedictorian of HS class of 39 students
Former member of Mensa
A vegetarian
Trained Hypnotist
a 94th percentile on a difficult qualification exam for business school
& most importantly as qualified and TOTALLY impartial commentator
“I don’t vote and I am not a member of a political party.”

So - Step off Sir, step off

2 Likes

“Things just couldn’t go back to normal after the incident…”

1 Like

Some of you are extremely butthurt over this cartoonists analysis of Trump.

Go look at his prediction record during this election cycle and you’ll notice He’s been very prescient.

A lot better than most of you who have called every single Trump tactic a “blunder”

He’s also worth 75M according to my Google search. Isn’t that way more than gary Johnson?

A little levity raj,

I’ve already stated several times I am voting for Trump and I find Dilbert one of the funniest strips ever

What does this have to do with anything? Bill Cosby is worth $400M. Justin Bieber $200M.

Dude draws cartoons for a living…

Some of you speak reverently of Gary Johnson for building a business from the ground up while deriding adams for doing the same in the same breath.

It’s purely hypocritical

Nobody making fun of his business or cartoons. We were, however, making fun of you using him as a political insider.

Gary Johnson’s credentials are not just building a business. That is part of it, but he was a governor, which makes him about 1000x more relavant for anything politics than a cartoonist.

Wasn’t he analyzing Clinton?

You sound like somebody who is selling the person as the best stock picker ever because his last pick made him money.