Sure, a barrier won’t stop immigration altogether, but it reduces it considerably. It also is a show of good faith that government can be trusted to handle the issue, and voters are more open to give government the power to handle it.
Lying like a buffoon – and in such a way that is easily falsifiable – doesn’t win votes, either.
Rationality was classically understood to be one of the chief masculine traits. It was only recently, when “masculinity” became an internet-based obsession for pitiable little losers who don’t get laid and therefore spend enormous amounts of their time obsessing over why and how they don’t get laid, that masculinity came to be understood as this juvenile, pathetic, ten-point process of performative tricks that might – just might! – confuse some poor woman into letting a ludicrous nobody put his little dick in her for twenty nauseating seconds.
Which is to say that most of us aren’t the kind of “men” for whom owning up to deliberate falsehood (“acting like a scolded child,” in your unmasculine formulation) is a net-negative act.
The best guess is around 40% of illegal immigrants are visa overstayers, not quite most but still a significant chunk. Make an immigrant visa similar to a credit card, every time you use your credit card, the time, date, and amount are recorded. Scan an immigrant visa as they come in, if there is no scan out by the time it expires or is renewed, then go detain them.
How will you find them? Will you monitor them during their stay here? Would there be a database maintained at our expense?
I thought I read it was higher than that, but I buy it. So, a very expensive wall might stop illegal entry into the country for some percentage of 60% of illegals. That’s okay, I guess. It’s not exactly knocking my socks off.
I’m not trying to prove anything in regards to racist/crazy/hateful. People surely can take his comments that way, but I’m simply pointing out the dishonesty of claiming that trump “brought the issue to closure”.
There is no problem with using somebody’s own words to discredit a falsehood they are claiming. Trump just makes it too easy.
“The campaign, nor Hillary, did not start the birther movement. Period. End of the story,” Patti Solis Doyle told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer.
She did say, however, that a volunteer coordinator in Iowa in late 2007 “did forward an email that promoted the (birther) conspiracy.”
“Hillary made the decision immediately to let that person go. We let that person go. And it was beyond the pale, Wolf, and so not worthy of the kind of campaign that certainly Hillary wanted to run or that we as a staff wanted to run that I called David Plouffe, who was obviously managing Barack Obama’s campaign in '07, to apologize and basically say that this was not coming from us. It was a rogue volunteer coordinator,” Doyle added.
Trump better hope he doesn’t have to be held accountable for the forwarded emails of campaign volunteers. Remember when NPR or PBS interviewed a Trump phone-jockey and she was covered in “14” and “88” tats?