The Next President of the United States: IV

At least the candidate I support is sober all the time vs the one you support rarely is ever.

The report uses empirical calculations to back up my first 2 assertions.
The next two statements are easily seen by anyone, including you.

The rest of what you wrote I take as rhetorical venting since I haven’t championed his business activities nor ethics, other to disagree with statement saying he has zero business acumen.

Here is an article I haven’t posted if you are interested in “Golden Spoons”.

Who exactly has said he has “zero business acumen”?

And your blog post isn’t all that compelling - he’s trying to bake in tax bites that may or may not have happened (assuming he even got the tax rates right, which he warns against himself). Why would Trump have paid taxes every year on those assets? He wouldn’t have.

Wait - you mean to tell me the half-literate sentence fragments Trump issues are all done sober?

That makes it worse for you, not better. Whiskey or weed would at least be an excuse for him when he notes that the Times “doesn’t write good”. That he’s operating at 100% while stumbling through his policy explanations isn’t helping your argument.

In any event, you claim is childish rubbish. So, like all your other posts.

3 Likes

Indeed - & who (meaning me) said all of the other fawning and lionizing statements?

You are poo pooing a financial analysis of a fantasy statement of ‘doubling one’s wealth’ while throwing out your opinion

Those are your opinions and I don’t care that you have them or write them.

This is my last reply to you on this, as it has devolved into “Who exactly has said” territory on both of our sides

Word usage is measured by effectiveness. How’s gary Johnsons effectiveness panned out?

Pretty well - Johnson has taken a fringe party and created a viable alternative for which conservatives can cast a vote, which was the primary goal, and one that has been accomplished.

It’d be even better (but unlikely) to get Johnson on the debate stage with Trump and Hillary, where Johnson’s policy depth - especially fiscal policy - would be in sharp contrast to Trump’s sputtering.

1 Like

I was referring to his drug trade. I know you’re slow Aragorn and you get only half of everything you say correct but try to follow along.

Dimwit

Funny stuff the guy calls himself a libertarian.

Ha ha these Trump haters are so blind with raw hate the facts escape them.

You mean going from 1% in 2012 and almost zero visibility to polling at 10% and national visibility and attention in 2016? Hell, most of that growth happened in the last 6 months.

So, a 1000% growth in polls and visibility for him as a candidate, not to mention personal popularity. It’s immaterial that he is a long shot for the presidency–that kind of explosive growth to a party and a candidate is by definition effective. So–pretty fucking well.

You give Johnson credit for going from 1% to 10% yet Trump gets no credit for going from a New York City business man to a well known Television star, to actually capturing the republican nomination with more votes than any previous republican in history.

Right…I know you don’t like him but is the word “fair” in your limited vernacular?

You got caught, you even admitted you knew in your own words, and all you can do is hurl insults like a toddler. I didn’t insult you, I asked you a question over your direct admission. Your words, your admission, your problem. Obviously taking one from Alinsky and ignoring a direct threat to your non-existent and misleading argument, honesty and crediblity.

I knew more mature people than you when I was in middle school myself. These elementary school insults are exceedingly boring and predictable, and what’s more you can’t even hold your tantrums to the PWI forum where, if one can say they “belong” anywhere, they might find a place; you like to hurl insults unprovoked in other forums when nobody is even addressing you.

Your intellectual pablum is weak, your insults are boringly maundering and infantile, and your cajones are nonexistent. You aren’t even worthy to hold my dirty jockstrap, my intellectual refuse nor my physical, being the raving Philistine man-child that you are. Both are far superior to whatever you can possibly hope to comprehend and achieve either in the physical world or the mental. Deal with it, or get penis envy and come back at me with another predictable “I built a business…” “I’m a business owner…” “pants suit lover”, or my favorite “butt boy” insult.

Shit, find some new material cocksplatter. “Butt boy” was old hat when I was in middle school.

4 Likes

Probably not. I always found this interesting though, as the two main parties have nominated people who are every bit as socially liberal with possibly the exception of the war on drugs. It’s not really a choice socially, so why not at least consider the guy who is more experienced and seems more sane than Trump, and is more straightforward than HRC?

What are your thoughts on that? The way I see it there are 3 near synonymous options from the social angle–I don’t buy for one minute that Trump is actually pro-life given his myriad volte-faces and outright lies about what he has said, done, or believes. That is just me personally, I am sure others might. I don’t see any real differences between the 3 there.

LOL Aragorn your super sleuth skills have failed you AGAIN.

This is what I said genius:

"Yes, well aware of that. But, after his work was done as Governor Johnson became a drug dealer. Oh that’s right not PC to call it that. CEO of a marijuana company. Same thing in my book.’

That was in response to you saying that he had a construction business first. Do you see that part where I said “well aware of that”? DO YOU?

I was referring to his pot business and acknowledging that he had a construction business and was Governor prior to being a drug dealer.

You allegedly work in the field of scientific research at least that’s what I picked up from a few of your posts. To that I say heaven forbid when you can’t even discern the fact that I gave him credit for his construction business (and obviously we all know he was a Governor) and also slammed him for being a pot dealer.

Aragorn, there are a few people on this site that hate Trump so much that it blinds them to facts. Certain ones ramble on endlessly about how bad Trump is. It’s almost a border line disease Trumpmania, or something. I won’t mention any names as I don’t want to be here deep into the night trading posts. I urge you not to allow yourself to be dragged down that same rat hole. It’s too late for them but not for you. At this point in time you may have contracted “Trumpmania” I’m not sure.

And…you used to be such a good poster. Oh my…

What a shame.

With such low expectations stick to grassroot level politics

If that’s how you feel than you must be mega impressed by Trump