A trite stereotype. I know plenty of women that are hard-headed practitioners that have forgotten more about policy than you’ll ever know, and that’s no exaggeration. PhDs with decades of experience in public service.
^ has exactly nothing to do with women vis-a-vis policy. One could come up with some trite stereotypes for men.
Sex
Sports
Action movies
There are numerous examples of hard headed policy analysts that happen to have been born with a vagina. I’ve had the good fortune to meet some of them. You having male genatalia certainly hasn’t endowed you with a rudimentary understanding of policy.
This is certainly not a surprise. I forgot what Hillary called it prior to this…something like an “investigative analysis”. I laughed my ass off. The FBI always conducts criminal investigations. Anyone who think that Hillary is going to capture the White House better think again. The Bureau has dispatched about 300 agents in two separate criminal investigations. One regarding Hillary’s emails and the other on the Clinton Foundation.
I’m going to make a safe bet and believe that 300 agents over a period of almost one year will certainly turn up something in those two separate investigations. Whether our failed President will allow the head of the Justice Department to indict is almost irrelevant. Once Director Comey recommends an indictment she is toast. There will be no independent voters who will even look at her. And as I have said before her male union support will evaporate. And one more voting block that will either stay home or vote for Trump will be the 20 something’s who are already disillusioned over corruption in government and the fact that their socialist hero was denied the nomination.
I can almost hear Bismark’s tears hitting the ground–LOL
If you understood the law and classification as it relates to the case and the nature of the emails on Clinton’s server, you’d understand that an indictment is highly unlikely. The FBI is responsible for counter-intelligence, so it is indeed a security probe. State’s unclassified server had been a target for Russian security services at the time.
You are as full of shit on this as you are on so many other things you yammer on about. The FBI is conducting criminal investigation on the Clinton’s. As I have already schooled you on they have dedicated about 300 agents to this particular investigation. That’s more people than Al Capone had after him when the IRS took him down.
Your hero is a corrupt money grubbing lying sack of shit Bismark.
^ has exactly nothing to do with women vis-a-vis policy. One could come up with some trite stereotypes for men.
Sex
Sports
Action movies[/quote]
You say this while on a forum where exactly 0 females post regularly. For the people who have been on PWI for a decade plus, how many prolific deep thinking female posters have you come across that posted at least semi-regularly on this board? If so what’s the split of good regular male to female posters over the years? 98-2?
If you want to see the things women are largely concerned about go onto pinterest.
Oh yeah I bet. Harsher rape laws, abortion access and free contraceptives. Anything else?
Maybe the women you know, in which case I suggest you find better quality company. All the women I hang out with either drink beer or whiskey–straight up, I am drinking with a friend now–and talk about archeology, anthropology, foreign policy, biology, physics, history, or growing business operations.
Sounds like you just hang around boring, unintelligent people and that you like to generalize.
Lol. Nice try. How unintelligent do you have to be to think all or even most intelligent women have to be unattractive?
Sounds like somebody bought far too much into the bro-tastic bro-osophy of high school jocks and never came out. I suggest a wholesale relocation in mental attitude.
[quote=“Aragorn, post:3067, topic:212571, full:true”]
Lol. Nice try. How unintelligent do you have to be to think all or even most intelligent women have to be unattractive?[/quote]
Starting a post with lol = I have you in the defensive crouch
Agreed. On a completely unrelated topic why is there such a shortage of women in STEM careers?!?!
If ever I was on the fence about the need to restrict suffrage on the basis that we have too many ignorant wretches in the voting pool, your posts have firmly convinced me we need it.