The Mike Mentzer Evolution?

Nothing was as bad as mega mass 4000, that thick nasty goop lay in your insides like cement lol.

1 Like

No doubt at it. But when it first came out i recall it was being touted by some promoters to be as effective as steriods lol. Plus is was a ridiculous price in the 90s, like 4-5 times more expensive as it is now.

Mentzer pretty regularly used protein powder when he did his Olympia preps. In his Heavy Duty Journal that shows part of his 1979 prep he had a ā€œprotein drinkā€ most every day. So this whole perception he had been anti supplements of any kind until the 1990s is a bit wrong.

To Mike’s credit, protein powder and creatine are very useful. I’m sure he felt so as well, as I can’t imagine how awful protein Back then must’ve tasted.

Just to be clear Dave, I’m not trying to discredit Mike for advocating the use of supplements, my point is theres individuals who knew him fairly well (such as John Little) or met him over the years that say he didn’t push or promote supplements as Mike himself believed that lf the individual simply observes a well balanced diet then they didn’t NEED nor require the use of supplements.
With that said, by the mid 90s supplements had come a long way in terms of quality and better understanding/data etc. So perhaps he became more open to certain supplements.

1 Like

I didn’t figure you were, but you also raise a good point that Mike was pretty much a ā€œdo as I say, not as I doā€ type of guy and can therefore be kind of a contradictory person.

2 Likes

Funny you should say that, on one of those mid 90s audio tapes he also talked about using a weight gainer supplement in his younger days that in his words ā€œactually garenteed a pound of muscle gain per dayā€, he said he just got fat and by the time he’d dieted back down to his original starting weight he’d actually less muscle.

1 Like

Guys, I’d be Interested in hearing opinions with regards to pre exhaustion. Obviously Mike was a big advocate.

Persoanlly am starting to view the idea of pre exhaustion as advocated by Mike and AJ, whereby a single joint movement is taken to failure and immediately followed up with a compound movement as nothing more than a drop set of sorts.

So for example, if you pre exhaustion the pecs with a cable cross, pec deck flye or dumbbell flye, the brunt of the work of course is done by the pecs, but there’s still a fair degree of involvement from the front delts and even the triceps, then you move a quickly as possible to a watered down compound movement where the supposed weak links, in this case the front delts and triceps should be fresh and the pecs are exhausted.
Personally I got better results staying on the same machine, so in my case taking a set of pec deck flyes to failure and instead simply preform an immediate drop set using performance pins.

Not to mention, how many times have you been in a gym and you’ve taken your set of let’s say leg extensions to complete failure, but the leg press or squat machines are a 3 day camel ride on the other side of the damn building?? Or worse still, someone has nicked the machine your were going to supersetting your leg extensions with??. Of course that’s another issue altogether.

That’s the thing with pre and post exhaustion, with pre the compound movement suffers, with post the single joint movement suffers. Going forward I’ll probably keep the two separate, for example OHPs one day and laterals on another.

Not big on pre-exhaustion because the progression on that second lift is pretty much guaranteed to suffer. For instance, when I did the Heavy Duty I and Heavy Duty II routines, I would make great progress on the Dumbbell flye, but I could never seem to add any reps or weight to the incline bench afterwards. In retrospect, I believe I could’ve progressed both, had I just delineated the two and done them separately.

I am a fan of rest pause though. If I’m not rest pausing, I’m also a fan of super setting/ giant setting assistance work when it’s different Muscle groups (ie pull-ups, Tricep Extension, Lateral raises, Barbell curl) then repeat for x sets. Saves time and is good for conditioning. My hardest supersets are Romanian deadlift/pull ups and paused squats/pull ups. That gets my heart rate in the 150s-160s usually.

1 Like

Correct me if I am wrong

Jones and Darden use pre-exhaustion sparingly…once a week or once every couple weeks, kinda like the negative only exercises or the specialized routines…it is used to add variety to the loading methods

1 Like

Just skimmed thru 5 mentzer books, only thing I could find on supplements is to use supplements as a supplement and that most are scams…I am paraphrasing

I do recall from his tapes that he endorsed creatine and twinlabs…I could be mistaken as I have not heard the tape in probably 15 years

1 Like

An interesting discussion. I really like when someone question what we do in terms of outcome.

Personally, I fell in love with Dr Dardens Leg killer specialization routine, featured here on T-nation. Here I found that keeping the weights on the pre-exhaust (db squats 30-10-30), in favor of the leg press (where I gradually increased the weight) followed by the final 60 sec wall squat hold - really pushed my legs to the limit.

I have always believed that legs need lots of attention, meaning more of either volume, frequency or intensity. Nothing extraordinary with that, as legs feature several muscle groups.

1 Like

Not too sure about AJ, though he did build double compound machines.
As far as am aware, all of Mikes routines and workouts (bar for his consolidation routine) included pre exhaustion). Every workout in HD1 and HD2 included pre exhaustion.

1 Like

Yes that is what Mike did…pre-exhaust every workout…which may be why over training could happen quicker

As for AJ, if you look at the routines of the Colorado experiment…the only double machine used for the majority of the period was the double shoulder

1 Like

Or how he had the likes of Viator and Oliva double pre exhaust the legs with leg extensions and leg presses before immediately moving into barbell squats. Either way, they both advocated the use of pre exhaustion.
What am interested in hearing is people opinion with regards to the idea behind pre exhaustion, as i mentioned previously, my own view is that its nothing more than a drop set of sorts, a set extender.

1 Like

Mike sent me a bunch of that Twinlabs product with the creatine and protein mix for free. Chocolate flavor.

1 Like

Then would you think that supersets or giant sets be the same as pre-exhaustion or dropsets… as you say…set extenders?

1 Like

Personally ive never been a fan on moving from one exercise to the next with little rest. Whether it be two opposing muscle groups or the same bodypart. If i was for example i was supersetting curls and pushdown, id still take a few minutes between sets.
Mike said a long time ago that ā€œanything you can do to make an exercise harder is a step in the right directionā€.
For me, rest pause and omni contraction, negative only, static holds…heavy enough that you require a training partner to help you into the contracted position. Such as max contraction training.
Another one which i know youve been fortunate enough to use on a few occasions are the X Force machines.
These for me are as Mike said ā€œa step in the right directionā€.

1 Like

I fell in love with very little rest between exercises and the negatives too

I am HIT4ME from the original Darden forum…the one that likes golf…if you remember

1 Like

Ah yes Dan isnt it? Thought it was your good self. :+1:

1 Like