The Media and Palin's Gender Card

[quote]Rockscar wrote:
Why can a married woman, who is impregnated by her husband, go have an abortion without the fathers knowledge?

Yes, this happens all the time. Unless you already HAVE children of your own, most young people have a slant to support abortion.

Once you realize that this child you love and have is here because life was chosen. I can’t imagine abortion anymore.

I once supported it, while I was in college getting communized…but as we grow older and have to pay bills and take care of a family, you realize the liberal way is anti family and anti the way I want to bring up my family. [/quote]

That is one of the reasons if not the main one for some, why roe v wade is bad law. It takes the father out of the decision.

[quote]GCF wrote:
zephead4747 wrote:
Why abort the baby when you can give it up for adoption anyways? You can deal with the temporary pain, if the other option is ending a life.

I am keeping my own opinions of abotion out of this I just like to see on both sides some form of honest critical thought.

Temporaray pain? Is that the reason you think people have abortions? How about considering other factors:

shame
ostricism by family
ostricism by friends
career damage
the physical damage of childbirth
the risks involved in pregnancy
financial considerations
religious considerations
attempt to hide pregnancy
the difficulties of being pregnant
giving up a baby you have carried around for 9 months
pschological health

There are many more than can be added to the list and woman considering abortion have to weigh up a combination of them. I’m not trying to change your view on abortion just attempting to point out that it is a far more complex decision than you make it out. [/quote]

“the difficulties of being pregnant” and “shame” justifies taking a life?

No sir, it does not.

This is you suffering for a decision you made. You are now saddled with a child, who has the same right to life as you do.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
The term “feminist” has been co-opted by the left. You can’t be a feminist and be conservative. It goes against the rules of Gloria Steinem, HG Brown.

They are treating Palin in much the same way that Clarence Thomas was treated, and to a large extent still is.

You can’t be conservative and out perform the liberal standard whether you are a white, female conservative, or a black, male conservative.

The militant feminists (feminazis, to steal from Rush) absolutely hate everything Palin stands for.

Just look for some of Buckeye girls posts in the political forum. I’m not saying she is a militant feminist, but she echos the opinion of most liberal feminists.

So yeah, hedo is way more right than wrong on this. [/quote]

Wait a second here. Who the fuck do you think you are to judge me by five posts in one PWI thread, especially when most of those posts said nothing about politics, feminism, abortion or any other related subject? I don’t think I’ve ever even posted in this forum before yesterday, but now I somehow represent the “average” liberal feminist? Aside from my pro-choice stance, you know nothing about my political views.

If simply believing that women have a right to effective forms of birth control and should have the ability to choose to have an abortion makes me a militant feminist, a liberal feminist, a feminazi, or whatever other “insult” you feel is appropriate, so be it. Give me my combat boots and a big pink flag with a vagina on it.

I never said I was pro-abortion. I said I was pro-choice. I don’t give a shit what the right choice is for you. Just that you have the ability to make that choice.

These assumptions that you guys make are absolutely ridiculous. I minored in women’s studies and have never once heard a classmate, professor, or text mock or vilify mothers. If anything, we discussed the issues that women face as mothers, and how to fix them. You need to stop getting all of your info about what feminism is from Henry Makow.

I can’t speak for other women (or should I say womyn?) or feminists, but I dislike Palin because she is interested in taking away women’s rights. Harming rather than helping. She is simply a right wing nut job with tits.

[quote]zephead4747 wrote:
GCF wrote:
zephead4747 wrote:
Why abort the baby when you can give it up for adoption anyways? You can deal with the temporary pain, if the other option is ending a life.

I am keeping my own opinions of abotion out of this I just like to see on both sides some form of honest critical thought.

Temporaray pain? Is that the reason you think people have abortions? How about considering other factors:

shame
ostricism by family
ostricism by friends
career damage
the physical damage of childbirth
the risks involved in pregnancy
financial considerations
religious considerations
attempt to hide pregnancy
the difficulties of being pregnant
giving up a baby you have carried around for 9 months
pschological health

There are many more than can be added to the list and woman considering abortion have to weigh up a combination of them. I’m not trying to change your view on abortion just attempting to point out that it is a far more complex decision than you make it out.

“the difficulties of being pregnant” and “shame” justifies taking a life?

No sir, it does not.

This is you suffering for a decision you made. You are now saddled with a child, who has the same right to life as you do.
[/quote]

Zep, what exactly makes you so special that you can judge what is an acceptable reason to “take a life”? What makes you so morally superior? Who gave you the right to say that one must “suffer for a decision that they made”?

Why is it the woman that has to suffer the shame, the physical pain, the moral judgements, the risk or ostracism? Cause, the way I see things, there are two, not three people that are likely to suffer from an unwanted pregnancy. Mother and child. Of course it is easy for you (men) to say that one must suffer from the decision made. You have the ability to fuck 'em and leave 'em. You aren’t the ones that suffer much. Men made the same “bad” decision to have sex, but what consequences do they really suffer?

[quote]zephead4747 wrote:
GCF wrote:
zephead4747 wrote:

“the difficulties of being pregnant” and “shame” justifies taking a life?

No sir, it does not.

This is you suffering for a decision you made. You are now saddled with a child, who has the same right to life as you do.
[/quote]

I didn’t say it did and you know it. But to some people it would be a big factor in their decision whether you agree with them or not.

I was responding to your post which to me intimated that the ‘temporary pain’ was the other side of the coin to abortion. There are a host of factors in decisions of abortions and ignoring them and simplifying it down to the extreme really does no good in explaining the pro life argument.

Just for the record this is exactly the same thing as when pro choicers say… they just don’t want women to have control over their bodies. It is a gross simplification and doesn’t take into consideration the host of factors in pro lifers argument.

[quote]buckeye girl wrote:
pushharder wrote:
I’m stumped. In my post there was:

No ranting.

No raving.

No name calling.

No childishness.

Yes, sarcasm. Mild sarcasm to illustrate a point. Please don’t descend to the “Fuck you, I’m out” deal. C’mon. You’re better than that. Besides, I like ya.

I like ya too. I’m still out though :wink:

I don’t think this is one of those things that can be discussed without things getting ugly and I don’t want that. Plus, I’m pretty sure that hanging around the politics forum will result in me hating 90% of you crazy conservative bastards (and I mean that in the nicest way possible)[/quote]

and I mean THIS in the nicest possible way … maybe you shouldn’t make your avatar a banner ad for I’ll cut off your balls if you mess with my abortion. That is … if you’d like to have an intelligent, reasoned discussion of abortion like you say?

Just a mild suggestion … nicely put and carefully delivered … did I say nicely?

[quote]Nominal Prospect wrote:
Even though Dick Morris is a Jew, I liked his comment about women (Hillary) “retreating behind the apron strings”. He’s right! Stewrat is annoying as always and also a Jew. Nothing to see here.

McCain picking Palin was 100% political.

So what? I thought everyone knew. Let’s be realists.

This whole thing is a circus. I don’t support John McCain. Never have.

I just want to see the Dems lose again.[/quote]

Where the hell did this come from?

Even though Dick Morris is a Jew?

[quote]flyboy51v wrote:
and I mean THIS in the nicest possible way … maybe you shouldn’t make your avatar a banner ad for I’ll cut off your balls if you mess with my abortion. That is … if you’d like to have an intelligent, reasoned discussion of abortion like you say?

Just a mild suggestion … nicely put and carefully delivered … did I say nicely?[/quote]

Oh I’m sorry, does my new avatar offend you? Cause all those avatars with bouncing tits offend me. So sad. I know.

With you guys, there is nothing to discuss. I believe one should have a choice you all do not. We disagree. I’m not changing my mind. You won’t change yours.

I didn’t come in here to rant and rave about reproductive rights. But after making one statement, to clarify a previous post, all hell broke loose because it suggested that I am pro choice.

[quote]pushharder wrote:
buckeye girl wrote:
…She is simply a right wing nut job with tits.

And you whacked on me for name calling? And I had not done even so.

Wow.

[/quote]

You can call me hurricane molly. I’m not trying to be nice anymore.

[quote]buckeye girl wrote:
flyboy51v wrote:
and I mean THIS in the nicest possible way … maybe you shouldn’t make your avatar a banner ad for I’ll cut off your balls if you mess with my abortion. That is … if you’d like to have an intelligent, reasoned discussion of abortion like you say?

Just a mild suggestion … nicely put and carefully delivered … did I say nicely?

Oh I’m sorry, does my new avatar offend you? Cause all those avatars with bouncing tits offend me. So sad. I know.

With you guys, there is nothing to discuss. I believe one should have a choice you all do not. We disagree. I’m not changing my mind. You won’t change yours.

I didn’t come in here to rant and rave about reproductive rights. But after making one statement, to clarify a previous post, all hell broke loose because it suggested that I am pro choice.[/quote]

I didn’t say it offended me … it just suggests that you are not going to be able to look at this topic dispassionately when it’s important enough to make your identity … that’s all …

think Wells will play this weekend? (trying to change subject)

[quote]flyboy51v wrote:
I didn’t say it offended me … it just suggests that you are not going to be able to look at this topic dispassionately when it’s important enough to make your identity … that’s all …

think Wells will play this weekend? (trying to change subject)[/quote]

A week ago my avatar was Chuck Vogelpohl. I came across that picture and changed it on a whim. I thought it was kinda funny.

Perhaps I should change it back. Chuck is a total badass…

But yes, changing the subject…I don’t know.

[quote]buckeye girl wrote:
flyboy51v wrote:
I didn’t say it offended me … it just suggests that you are not going to be able to look at this topic dispassionately when it’s important enough to make your identity … that’s all …

think Wells will play this weekend? (trying to change subject)

A week ago my avatar was Chuck Vogelpohl. I came across that picture and changed it on a whim. I thought it was kinda funny.

Perhaps I should change it back. Chuck is a total badass…

But yes, changing the subject…I don’t know.
[/quote]

I haven’t read anything about wells either?? But the bengals suck and the pats lost brady so they’re all I’ve got.

I’m going to see that right wing nut job with tits at a rally tomorrow … so i’ve got to go to bed …

If i knew how to make that smiley face thing with my keyboard … I’d do that now …

[quote]GCF wrote:
pushharder wrote:
GCF wrote:
rainjack wrote:
The term “feminist” has been co-opted by the left. You can’t be a feminist and be conservative. It goes against the rules of Gloria Steinem, HG Brown.

They are treating Palin in much the same way that Clarence Thomas was treated, and to a large extent still is.

You can’t be conservative and out perform the liberal standard whether you are a white, female conservative, or a black, male conservative.

The militant feminists (feminazis, to steal from Rush) absolutely hate everything Palin stands for.

Just look for some of Buckeye girls posts in the political forum. I’m not saying she is a militant feminist, but she echos the opinion of most liberal feminists.

So yeah, hedo is way more right than wrong on this.

So hedo is right: feminists villify women and their families for choosing to have babies. Wow. Talking about making up facts to support your view. I really find it hard to believe you ACTUALLY belive that. Maybe I give you too much credit.

I guess I have never met a feminist then. Although I took a political science paper in University (called Gender in Politics) taken by two well known feminist writers. I had a great time in that paper and got on well with both lecturers and had some great debates with them. I wrote an essay that got a very high mark despite me completely disagreeing with them.

The class had about 60 students in it. I was one of 4 males. I was hated by many of the students. There were a lot of angry lesbians in there. The male bashing was intense sometimes but not once did I hear negative comments against women having children and husbands.

Both of the lecturers had husbands and children.

So I take it you are saying these two individuals are the norm, not an exception?

Yes, certainly in my experience. These two plus were just an exaample but the rest of that specific class (in fact feminists in all classes I have taken), plus the writings I read in that class and a couple of others I can honestly say I have never ever heard/read a feminist mock/villify a woman for having children or husbands.

Have the majority of feminists you have dealt with/read ever villified women and their families for having children?[/quote]

The so called exception to the rule can be staring them in the face and they’d never know it. They are very quick fingered with the lefty liberal femi-nazi stamp. If they ever paid attention instead of plugging their ears and crying femi-nazi and worrying over the world contracting vagina dentata and eating them whole, they’d know that some of us do not lean to the left nearly as far as would make it convenient for them.

I have posted on this board, whole threads picking apart leftist positions, my belief system falls in line with Libertarians more than anything else. Liberal? Not a chance. Just ask my two brothers, staunch supporters of Obama…how liberal I am when they call and rail at me for having the sheer audacity, as a woman of an under-privelaged background, to be unwilling to cast a vote in his direction. It makes for a wearisome fight to be told that I achieved what I have in life, not because of the choices I’ve made in the face of adversity, or my intelligence, but because I am ‘white and pretty’. Makes the meat at the family barbecue taste like a combination of shit and guilt.

The abortion issue is discussed on this board every other week. Same opinions, same hamster wheel…same stalemate. I am still pro-choice. I have never villified Sarah Palin, or women with families and children. Being pro-choice does not make me anti-family or children. It doesn’t make me a frothy mouthed combat boot wearing liberal either. I don’t want Roe V Wade overturned, but I don’t want to slide headlong down the baseline of impending socialism either.

I can’t bat for either team without wanting to tear the number off my back and kick dirt at the umpires. To the left, I don’t want phony promises of reform based on entitlement or undue leniency regarding foreign policy and immigration disguised as diplomacy. To the right, I don’t want your religious sanctimony vomited all over my life or war mongering based on profit. I won’t vote for greed. I won’t vote for entitlement. Both sides are well and truly pissing in the face of this country. Both claiming rights to the true meaning of patriotism while deviating so far from the well worn but forgotten path it makes me sick.

I want a real candidate. Not a batch of blowhards, and not a bunch of panderers. Too much to ask, but then again…like I said, I like having choices. Right, now I have to go make dinner for my family and prepare for work tomorrow, then send my donation to planned parenthood and make sure my date to go shooting at Montana Hawk tomorrow is still on. Happy pigeonholing!

[quote]rainjack wrote:
The term “feminist” has been co-opted by the left. You can’t be a feminist and be conservative. It goes against the rules of Gloria Steinem, HG Brown.

They are treating Palin in much the same way that Clarence Thomas was treated, and to a large extent still is.

You can’t be conservative and out perform the liberal standard whether you are a white, female conservative, or a black, male conservative.

The militant feminists (feminazis, to steal from Rush) absolutely hate everything Palin stands for.

Just look for some of Buckeye girls posts in the political forum. I’m not saying she is a militant feminist, but she echos the opinion of most liberal feminists.

So yeah, hedo is way more right than wrong on this. [/quote]

To be fair, Clarence Thomas wasn’t exactly qualified.

But yes, they’ve taken over the moniker politically. Just don’t assume all women who consider themselves feminists are just like them. At all.

[quote]buckeye girl wrote:
zephead4747 wrote:
GCF wrote:
zephead4747 wrote:
Why abort the baby when you can give it up for adoption anyways? You can deal with the temporary pain, if the other option is ending a life.

I am keeping my own opinions of abotion out of this I just like to see on both sides some form of honest critical thought.

Temporaray pain? Is that the reason you think people have abortions? How about considering other factors:

shame
ostricism by family
ostricism by friends
career damage
the physical damage of childbirth
the risks involved in pregnancy
financial considerations
religious considerations
attempt to hide pregnancy
the difficulties of being pregnant
giving up a baby you have carried around for 9 months
pschological health

There are many more than can be added to the list and woman considering abortion have to weigh up a combination of them. I’m not trying to change your view on abortion just attempting to point out that it is a far more complex decision than you make it out.

“the difficulties of being pregnant” and “shame” justifies taking a life?

No sir, it does not.

This is you suffering for a decision you made. You are now saddled with a child, who has the same right to life as you do.

Zep, what exactly makes you so special that you can judge what is an acceptable reason to “take a life”? What makes you so morally superior? Who gave you the right to say that one must “suffer for a decision that they made”?

Why is it the woman that has to suffer the shame, the physical pain, the moral judgements, the risk or ostracism? Cause, the way I see things, there are two, not three people that are likely to suffer from an unwanted pregnancy. Mother and child. Of course it is easy for you (men) to say that one must suffer from the decision made. You have the ability to fuck 'em and leave 'em. You aren’t the ones that suffer much. Men made the same “bad” decision to have sex, but what consequences do they really suffer?[/quote]

Why bring men into this? They know very well if you where to keep a baby, they would be paying out their ass for the next 18 years.

If I have to, on a moral level tell you taking lie away from the most innocent thing out there, a child is evil. Then there isn’t much left to discuss.

[quote]Beowolf wrote:
rainjack wrote:
The term “feminist” has been co-opted by the left. You can’t be a feminist and be conservative. It goes against the rules of Gloria Steinem, HG Brown.

They are treating Palin in much the same way that Clarence Thomas was treated, and to a large extent still is.

You can’t be conservative and out perform the liberal standard whether you are a white, female conservative, or a black, male conservative.

The militant feminists (feminazis, to steal from Rush) absolutely hate everything Palin stands for.

Just look for some of Buckeye girls posts in the political forum. I’m not saying she is a militant feminist, but she echos the opinion of most liberal feminists.

So yeah, hedo is way more right than wrong on this.

To be fair, Clarence Thomas wasn’t exactly qualified.

But yes, they’ve taken over the moniker politically. Just don’t assume all women who consider themselves feminists are just like them. At all.[/quote]

LIBERAL feminists. You, buckeye girl, and GCF seem to leave the qualifier off. Palin should be the poster girl for women who aspire to achieving success in a male dominated career field.

The argument during Thomas confirmation was never about being unqualified. It was only that he was not black enough and too conservative.