So let me get this straight–first it was “no side effects”. Now it’s “death shouldn’t be counted as a side effect because they said it was rare”.
What in the ever loving FUCK.
1 Like
but mu stem cell therrrrapy
1 Like
Terrible retort. They control the political system via lobbyists and their campaign contributions. You must be the only one who isn’t aware of it.
Who should have gone to jail? How about those who helped destroy the economy through their white-collar crime. But I’m sure you deny anything was done wrong and getting rid of the Glass-Stegal Act had no bearing at all for the financial crisis of 08’.
What are the chances of people dying from stem-cell therapy vs. approved FDA drugs?
What in the ever loving FUCK.
That would be who, exactly? Try using evidence instead of your feelings to answer this, for once.
1 Like
Right, that’s why Hillary is heaed to the White House… 
They buy influence. They don’t “control” the political system.
Nope. I just require this thing called evidence because I’m not a statist like you.
What in the ever loving FUCK, indeed…
1 Like
No Hillary isn’t going because the public has had enough. Trump is seen as an outsider and that is attractive to them. Not to mention the low voter turnout for Hill as the public could not get excited enough for a corporate politician.
Read all about it here. https://www.amazon.com/How-They-Got-Away-Criminals/dp/023115691X So in your estimation what were the major causes of the financial collapse in 08’?
What kind of stem cells were used, adult or embryonic? Big difference.
Let me connect the dots for you since you can’t seem to do it.
You claimed:
And used this example:
So I said:
To which you wrote:
To which I wrote:
In other words, Wall Street does not control Washington. Their candidate LOST. That isn’t control.
L o fucking l… Translation: You haven’t got the slightest clue what the fuck you’re talking about so I’m supposed to buy a $32 book written by some random professors from some non-named college.
That’s a big ol negative.
We’ve only had this conversation 17 other times…
The study’s in the link. You can read, I assume.
Man! Its almost disturbing to see this level of intelligence collide with such intense stupidity.
2 Likes
Like matter and anti-matter. I’m just not sure where the ensuing annihilation is happening lol
Well, it tells you in the quotations if you read it. The difference is what exactly? Citations?
Do you even know what kind of stem cells the study you cited for AG was using?
The power is ultimately with the people and they won out for once. This is good news. How often does a candidate who receives the most in contributions win vs. loose? Why is it that corporations contribute so much to candidates? Is it just for fun? Or do they do so in order to create conditions that are favorable to them often at the expense of the public?
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/august01/2001-08-10-bush-stem-qa.htm#more
There are ethical issues using embryonic stem cells. And they have the ability to turn into tumors and there is possible rejection Graft vs. Host.
While the NIH says that adult stem cells are difficult to multiply. This is an issue worked out by other countries. And in the U.S. you cannot multiply them as it would be considered a drug.
Adult or umbilical-cord stem cells were used were the kind of stem cells I put forth.
Yes, those were the cells in question in the in vitro culture experiment you quoted. However the culture experiment was directly testing multiplication in a new media–which shows that there is no restriction on multiplication of ‘adult’ stem cells as such, because it would have been in direct contravention of the law.
This multiplication was done outside of the U.S.