There is no such thing as a transgender person. A person has two x chromosomes per cell or an x and a y chromosome per cell. This fact is true of all babies after exiting the womb. If you didn’t know this simple fact you would lose points on a high school level biology test.
Honestly I’m split here. Part of me wants to stand against this bullshit, but the other part of me wants to let it ride until the Feminists pull their heads out their asses and start having a purpose again.
You joined this forum to post that? And you might want to study biology because you are wrong.
Quit using that word Andrew.
They can’t because they started it and, it would mean siding with their perceived perpetual enemy. It’s why they’ll call a European descended white male a racist when he criticizes Muslims for how they treat women in nations where Islam is dominant.
Like it or not it has been adopted as a word in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary
cisgender
adjective
cis·gen·der (ˌ)sis-ˈjen-dər
variants or less commonly cisgendered
: of, relating to, or being a person whose gender identity corresponds with the sex the person had or was identified as having at birth
No. Read @lordgains post.
I’m not worried about offending the 0.08% of the population who chose to do this to themselves.
The leverage of the Left is like a moment arm. The further left the issue is the greater the torque (or leverage.)
I agree. Which is why i kind of want to let it play out and find us some new conservative voters (feminists)!
Racial slurs are in the dictionary, it doesn’t mean someone has to be ok with being called one.
The problem with this analysis is that when you think you are offending 0.08%, you fail to realize that the Left plays as a team.
I question if the majority of that number really chose it. Many kids have it pushed on them.
I only commented that it is an accepted word in the English language.
Why do you use that word?
I read @lordgains manifesto. But, let’s not forget that word connotations exist in the english language.
Regardless, It’s already defined as an offensive term so why use it when you could simply say transgender person?
Is it wrong to think about the feelings of others sometimes?
I’m genuinely shocked Andrew.
I agree that the dictionary has accepted it as a word. It obviously is a real word but I get to choose how am labeled.
More correctly stated: “I get to chose how would like to be labeled.”
Hey man, any thoughts regarding the question I’ve brought up a couple of times?
You need to do a little more research on this.
You’ve never heard me use a single ‘derogatory’ term until this one, i wonder why. ![]()
Because Trannies claim oppression whilst simultaneously oppressing everyone else. They are using their self-imposed victim status to bully and badger their way through life.
These people are not victims. They use it as a tool to bully their way into wealth and notoriety.
So yes, i use the term ‘trannies’ and do not care. The few people who are actually afflicted with Gender Dysphoria, are not making TikToks about how wonderful it is to mutilate your genitals. The few people who are actually gender dysphoric are not going about it like it’s something to be celebrated, and they need help.
Trans is an ideology, not an identity. No one gives a fuck if you feel like you should be a different gender. No one.
The more diplomatic method has better outcomes for an average citizen because violence has consequences.
Now if there weren’t consequences then I say “HELL YEAH!!!” if someone wants to blow a kkk white surpremacist head off with a shotgun point blank. It’s a quick solution and the problem disappears from the earth.
Talking and violence can both be effective in my opinion.
