[quote]sufiandy wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Lord Carey said Christians are being treated like bigots and face the same sort of persecution homosexuals were once subjected to.
[/quote]
That’s like a KKK member complaining about being persecuted by a group of black people.[/quote]
Intolerance of intolerance is still intolerance. If Christians are wrong to discriminate against homosexuals on moral grounds, it’s just as wrong to discriminate against Christians on moral grounds.
GLSEN tactics:
‘On Sunday, April 15, the Patriots Day Tea Party event on the Boston Common was viciously attacked and disrupted. An afternoon planned for families bringing kids with speeches and prayers was completely overwhelmed by a very large, well-organized group of over 100 homosexual activists and thugs from Occupy Boston and local “queer” groups. They went right into the crowd, carrying signs with four-letter words, and screaming obscene and vulgar chants throughout the event, attempting to harass and terrify everyone. They even used a bullhorn.’
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen2/12b/tea_party_0415/attack/upcoming.html
On Saturday, March 31, GLSEN (Gay Lesbian Straight Education Network) held its annual regional conference at MIT in Cambridge. GLSEN is the major force pushing graphic homosexual programs and “gay clubs” in the public schools K-12, as well as other activities targeting children.
GLSEN gets over $400,000 from the federal government and enormous yearly funding through various state budget sources from the Massachusetts taxpayers. At this year’s conference were pro-homosexual teachers and administrators as well as children from high school age to as young as nine. They had workshops and presentations about their latest and planned activities in the schools, and LOTS of handouts.
This device(at link) for homosexual oral sex was given to kids at the GLSEN conference.
Check out the link. Masked queers intimidating people and holding signs like “Jesus had 2 Dads” and “Class War” whilst the police stand by.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
GLSEN tactics:
‘On Sunday, April 15, the Patriots Day Tea Party event on the Boston Common was viciously attacked and disrupted. An afternoon planned for families bringing kids with speeches and prayers was completely overwhelmed by a very large, well-organized group of over 100 homosexual activists and thugs from Occupy Boston and local “queer” groups. They went right into the crowd, carrying signs with four-letter words, and screaming obscene and vulgar chants throughout the event, attempting to harass and terrify everyone. They even used a bullhorn.’
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen2/12b/tea_party_0415/attack/upcoming.html
On Saturday, March 31, GLSEN (Gay Lesbian Straight Education Network) held its annual regional conference at MIT in Cambridge. GLSEN is the major force pushing graphic homosexual programs and “gay clubs” in the public schools K-12, as well as other activities targeting children.
GLSEN gets over $400,000 from the federal government and enormous yearly funding through various state budget sources from the Massachusetts taxpayers. At this year’s conference were pro-homosexual teachers and administrators as well as children from high school age to as young as nine. They had workshops and presentations about their latest and planned activities in the schools, and LOTS of handouts.
This device(at link) for homosexual oral sex was given to kids at the GLSEN conference.
Check out the link. Masked queers intimidating people and holding signs like “Jesus had 2 Dads” and “Class War” whilst the police stand by.[/quote]
What does ‘pro-homosexual’ mean
Does that mean the teacher merely mentions that two men can be physically and sexually attracted to each other, something kids are aware of (and insult each other about) from a very early age). Or is this an implication that they are from the ‘Monty Python and the meaning of life’ type of sex education. Because I read that as the former but it implies the latter.
[quote]Bambi wrote:
What does ‘pro-homosexual’ mean
Does that mean the teacher merely mentions that two men can be physically and sexually attracted to each other, something kids are aware of (and insult each other about) from a very early age). Or is this an implication that they are from the ‘Monty Python and the meaning of life’ type of sex education. Because I read that as the former but it implies the latter.[/quote]
Why don’t you go here:
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/info/kbase/horror_stories.html
And see what it means. You might want to get something to throw up into.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]Bambi wrote:
What does ‘pro-homosexual’ mean
Does that mean the teacher merely mentions that two men can be physically and sexually attracted to each other, something kids are aware of (and insult each other about) from a very early age). Or is this an implication that they are from the ‘Monty Python and the meaning of life’ type of sex education. Because I read that as the former but it implies the latter.[/quote]
Why don’t you go here:
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/info/kbase/horror_stories.html
And see what it means. You might want to get something to throw up into.[/quote]
Can I have links from a reputable newspaper/journal article, not one titled ‘mass resistance’ please
[quote]Bambi wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]Bambi wrote:
What does ‘pro-homosexual’ mean
Does that mean the teacher merely mentions that two men can be physically and sexually attracted to each other, something kids are aware of (and insult each other about) from a very early age). Or is this an implication that they are from the ‘Monty Python and the meaning of life’ type of sex education. Because I read that as the former but it implies the latter.[/quote]
Why don’t you go here:
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/info/kbase/horror_stories.html
And see what it means. You might want to get something to throw up into.[/quote]
Can I have links from a reputable newspaper/journal article, not one titled ‘mass resistance’ please
[/quote]
You as well? Don’t you know how to “evaluate sources?” Or are you just trying to obfuscate? If the author uses quotation marks - “”(those things) - and claims that they are quoting a source, you can check that quote to see if they’re lying can’t you? And if you find the quote is genuine, you can check the context and ensure they aren’t misrepresenting what was said if need be. And you can then judge whether the author has drawn correct conclusions from the quotations.
And BTW, the first link on the page is to a promotional video made by GLSEN. There’s no commentary. You can see for yourself. Here’s an example:
A boy about 6-years-old is prompted by the teacher:
Teacher(prompting): Can you describe a little more what you meant by “open minded?”
Kid: Well if you’re not very open minded…you know like…let’s say there’s a new kind of vegetable or something. And if you’re not very open minded then you won’t try it. Because you…you know like, you don’t like to try new things. And if you are open minded then you would like to try it.
The next link on the page is to a facsimile copy of a GLSEN school pamphlet. Here’s a sample:
“Hey Queer Boys! Welcome to queer life in the 21st Century! Is this a great time to be gay or what?..F—in’, suckin’, spit or swallow? Rimming?(lickin’ butt) Watersports(piss play,) Fisting”
That’s a direct quote. The “ellipse” - …(that thing) - indicates that I have omitted some of the quote. That’s where someone who knows how to evaluate sources can check to see if I have misrepresented the GLSEN school pamphlet here:
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/black_book/black_book_inside.html
The third link on the page is also a direct facsimile copy of a GLSEN school pamphlet.
The fourth link has direct quotes from the founder of GLSEN, Obama-appointed czar Kevin Jennings, in a GLSEN speech to children as young as 12. Here’s a sample:
“Fisting [forcing one’s entire hand into another person’s rectum or vagina] often gets a bad rap…[It’s] an experience of letting somebody into your body that you want to be that close and intimate with…[and] to put you into an exploratory mode.”
You can also check yourself to learn if the claim that fisting kits and anal dams were given to primary school kids is true. But you already know it’s all true don’t you? You are just obfuscating because you support this stuff. Raj made the exact same post that you did - requesting “a different source” - and I had to explain to him what I’ve just had to explain to you. It really is a foolish tactic to use. Why don’t you just be honest and defend your real position? - that you support this. You do right? Why else would you try to fob it off with some fatuous request for a different source like raj?
In a May 19, 2005, article, The Boston Globe reported that “Fenway Community Health officials yesterday said they left about 10 copies of the ‘Little Black Book’ on an informational table they rented at a conference sponsored by the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network of Boston.” The article reported that according to a Fenway spokesman, one of their employees “brought the pamphlets along with other materials and put them on the table by mistake,” and quoted the Fenway’s president saying, ''Fenway Community Health regrets accidentally making available a small number of copies of the Little Black Book, an HIV-prevention publication for gay and bisexual men over the age of 18, at an event where young people were present."
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]Bambi wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]Bambi wrote:
What does ‘pro-homosexual’ mean
Does that mean the teacher merely mentions that two men can be physically and sexually attracted to each other, something kids are aware of (and insult each other about) from a very early age). Or is this an implication that they are from the ‘Monty Python and the meaning of life’ type of sex education. Because I read that as the former but it implies the latter.[/quote]
Why don’t you go here:
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/info/kbase/horror_stories.html
And see what it means. You might want to get something to throw up into.[/quote]
Can I have links from a reputable newspaper/journal article, not one titled ‘mass resistance’ please
[/quote]
You as well? Don’t you know how to “evaluate sources?” Or are you just trying to obfuscate? If the author uses quotation marks - “”(those things) - and claims that they are quoting a source, you can check that quote to see if they’re lying can’t you? And if you find the quote is genuine, you can check the context and ensure they aren’t misrepresenting what was said if need be. And you can then judge whether the author has drawn correct conclusions from the quotations.
And BTW, the first link on the page is to a promotional video made by GLSEN. There’s no commentary. You can see for yourself. Here’s an example:
A boy about 6-years-old is prompted by the teacher:
Teacher(prompting): Can you describe a little more what you meant by “open minded?”
Kid: Well if you’re not very open minded…you know like…let’s say there’s a new kind of vegetable or something. And if you’re not very open minded then you won’t try it. Because you…you know like, you don’t like to try new things. And if you are open minded then you would like to try it.
The next link on the page is to a facsimile copy of a GLSEN school pamphlet. Here’s a sample:
“Hey Queer Boys! Welcome to queer life in the 21st Century! Is this a great time to be gay or what?..F—in’, suckin’, spit or swallow? Rimming?(lickin’ butt) Watersports(piss play,) Fisting”
That’s a direct quote. The “ellipse” - …(that thing) - indicates that I have omitted some of the quote. That’s where someone who knows how to evaluate sources can check to see if I have misrepresented the GLSEN school pamphlet here:
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/black_book/black_book_inside.html
The third link on the page is also a direct facsimile copy of a GLSEN school pamphlet.
The fourth link has direct quotes from the founder of GLSEN, Obama-appointed czar Kevin Jennings, in a GLSEN speech to children as young as 12. Here’s a sample:
“Fisting [forcing one’s entire hand into another person’s rectum or vagina] often gets a bad rap…[It’s] an experience of letting somebody into your body that you want to be that close and intimate with…[and] to put you into an exploratory mode.”
You can also check yourself to learn if the claim that fisting kits and anal dams were given to primary school kids is true. But you already know it’s all true don’t you? You are just obfuscating because you support this stuff. Raj made the exact same post that you did - requesting “a different source” - and I had to explain to him what I’ve just had to explain to you. It really is a foolish tactic to use. Why don’t you just be honest and defend your real position? - that you support this. You do right? Why else would you try to fob it off with some fatuous request for a different source like raj?[/quote]
Wait so I ask for some alternate sources and now I want to fist children? Jesus Christ. I have no words.
Anyway I looked at it and there are like 6 links for 20 years worth of stuff. Pretty negligible if you ask me. And one of them - ‘Framing the Issue’- is a person saying that he wants homophobic language in schools to be stopped and frowned upon. If you really really take from that a ‘homosexual agenda’ with ‘fisting kits and anal dams’ you are the one with the problem not me
[quote]therajraj wrote:
In a May 19, 2005, article, The Boston Globe reported that “Fenway Community Health officials yesterday said they left about 10 copies of the ‘Little Black Book’ on an informational table they rented at a conference sponsored by the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network of Boston.” The article reported that according to a Fenway spokesman, one of their employees “brought the pamphlets along with other materials and put them on the table by mistake,” and quoted the Fenway’s president saying, ''Fenway Community Health regrets accidentally making available a small number of copies of the Little Black Book, an HIV-prevention publication for gay and bisexual men over the age of 18, at an event where young people were present."[/quote]
They(GLSEN) are notorious for lying. They lied after fistgate 1. They lied after fistgate 2. Their record and stated intentions speak for themselves. And I already linked to a direct quote from GLSEN founder and Obama czar Kevin Jennings describing how they use “anti-bullying” as a smokescreen to worm their way into schools. And I have shown what they have consistently promoted and distributed in schools.
[quote]Bambi wrote:
Wait so I ask for some alternate sources and now I want to fist children?
[/quote]
Wow, that’s some way to twist someone’s words. Firstly, on sources - I went through this with raj already as well. The “source” is the GLSEN video. You think the video is fake? The “source” is a facsimile copy of a GLSEN pamphlet. You think it’s fake? The “source” is a speech by GLSEN founder and Obama czar Kevin Jennings. You think they’re fake quotes? Exactly what “source” are you asking for?
And, as you well know I mean you support the radical GLBTQ agenda because you act as an apologist for them.
Well that’s where this conversation has to end then.
[quote]
And one of them - ‘Framing the Issue’- is a person saying that he wants homophobic language in schools to be stopped and frowned upon. If you really really take from that a ‘homosexual agenda’ with ‘fisting kits and anal dams’ you are the one with the problem not me[/quote]
What on earth are you talking about? Are you denying that they distributed fisting kits and anal dams or are you obfuscating? Why would you pick out a quote on bullying, accuse me of “tak(ing) from that” my information about fisting kits and anal dams? That’s a really dirty tactic. And really stupid as well.
