The Ad They Don't Want You to See

[quote]Mick28 wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
Headhunter wrote:

Obama’s Rules:

(1) Get government money for friends.
(2) Friends give chunk to me to run for office.
(3) Friends build horrible cheap slums. More money for me!

Oh yes. Because no other president, especially our current glorious leader, has ever done things like that.

Oh I didn’t know Bush was running again…Ha…you learn something everyday on this site.[/quote]

HA!

I had forgotten about you…and now I know why.

If none of you spoke up when Bush was doing it, why start now?

Unless Obama hires an old friend to run FEMA poorly as people are dying in the streets, I fail to see the problem.

[quote]Beowolf wrote:
And John Stewart is a COMEDIAN. Why does everyone think he’s the left’s version of Bill O’Reilly? People KNOW he’s joking. Duh. Use logic people…
[/quote]

Except when he show’s up on a cable news show, gets pissed and goes off on the host because he’s not being taken seriously.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
And John Stewart is a COMEDIAN. Why does everyone think he’s the left’s version of Bill O’Reilly? People KNOW he’s joking. Duh. Use logic people…

Except when he show’s up on a cable news show, gets pissed and goes off on the host because he’s not being taken seriously.

[/quote]

Probaby because people take retards like O’Reilly seriously but dismiss people like Stewart because he’s a comedian (as if he couldn’t be smart and make valid points because of his profession). Just a shot in the dark, I really have no idea, but I could see arrogant scumfucks like O’Reilly dismissing him because he’s not a “real journalist”, as oppposed to whatever it is that Fauxnews hires.

It’s ok though, because I think most people are beginning to realize the O’Reilly’s of the world for exactly what they are, thanks in part to Colbert and his calling him “papa bear” and all that.

Bill O’Reilly is a way better comedian than Stewart. Everything he says makes me laugh and roll my eyes and realize all the irony in the world, and that’s what great comedians do.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Mick28 wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
Headhunter wrote:

Obama’s Rules:

(1) Get government money for friends.
(2) Friends give chunk to me to run for office.
(3) Friends build horrible cheap slums. More money for me!

Oh yes. Because no other president, especially our current glorious leader, has ever done things like that.

Oh I didn’t know Bush was running again…Ha…you learn something everyday on this site.

HA!

I had forgotten about you…and now I know why.

If none of you spoke up when Bush was doing it, why start now?

Unless Obama hires an old friend to run FEMA poorly as people are dying in the streets, I fail to see the problem.[/quote]

Maybe because Bush was smart enough to fly under the radar? Obama’s dirty laundry is in the Boston Globe.

So, the question is, would you vote for Obama, knowing how he milked the system for $$$$ for his friends? Isn’t he running on character and such?

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

Maybe because Bush was smart enough to fly under the radar? Obama’s dirty laundry is in the Boston Globe.

So, the question is, would you vote for Obama, knowing how he milked the system for $$$$ for his friends? Isn’t he running on character and such?

[/quote]

Wait, so your problem with the man is that he isn’t shady enough?

LOL!!!

So, Republican = sister fuckin’ inbred piece of white trash hillbilly shit.

Democrat = Not a redneck inbred sister fuckin’ piece of white trash hillbilly shit.

Great, got it.

You know, I get so confused sometimes about how to label people, especially people who like to talk about polotiks! It’s websites like these that get me back on track! Thanks guys!

Can someone explain to a dumb Englishman what the fuck is with the Obama = Muslim stuff?

I have very little access to US culture (other than the TV shows) and have only visited 4 states, but is the problem that he is of mixed race?

I mean, no-one really thinks OMG - terrorist.

Do they?

Again, I dont know a great deal about the mans policies (what I do know sounds a little, well - different, with all the service talk) but everything I see so far just seems to focus on his name (which after someone called Bush seems a little weird).

Not being snarky, just interested…

[quote]GimpFace wrote:
Can someone explain to a dumb Englishman what the fuck is with the Obama = Muslim stuff?

I have very little access to US culture (other than the TV shows) and have only visited 4 states, but is the problem that he is of mixed race?

I mean, no-one really thinks OMG - terrorist.

Do they?

Again, I dont know a great deal about the mans policies (what I do know sounds a little, well - different, with all the service talk) but everything I see so far just seems to focus on his name (which after someone called Bush seems a little weird).

Not being snarky, just interested…

[/quote]

Because Americans are dumb?

Yes. There’s people out there that insisted Obama was Muslim because of his name. There were people that believed said idiots because they will believe whatever they have to in order to keep a black man from being president.

Gimp face, if you stick around, you’ll soon realize that some guys here speak “foxspeak” only; they laught at the same idiotic “french” jokes in unison, they hate libs (which is also a synonym for marxist, socialist, commie, gay and muslim) with a vengeance, and they have a masochistic longing for a strong state that takes away their liberties for nonsical reasons and sends their sons to die in various developing countries.

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Gimp face, if you stick around, you’ll soon realize that some guys here speak “foxspeak” only; they laught at the same idiotic “french” jokes in unison, they hate libs (which is also a synonym for marxist, socialist, commie, gay and muslim) with a vengeance, and they have a masochistic longing for a strong state that takes away their liberties for nonsical reasons and sends their sons to die in various developing countries.[/quote]

But I’m scared of terrorists. They’re not taking away my freedom- I don’t do anything wrong so there’s nothing to worry about. And we’re fighting them over there so we don’t have to fight them in the subways and back alleys of New York like an Arab version of West Side Story.

Those are homo commie words Scwarz, and I bet it stems from the fact that Nazi is in your blood because you’re from Austria.

Did I cover all the bases there?

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Gimp face, if you stick around, you’ll soon realize that some guys here speak “foxspeak” only; they laught at the same idiotic “french” jokes in unison, they hate libs (which is also a synonym for marxist, socialist, commie, gay and muslim) with a vengeance, and they have a masochistic longing for a strong state that takes away their liberties for nonsical reasons and sends their sons to die in various developing countries.[/quote]

Don’t you have a burning weiner-schnitzel to worry about or something. You haven’t the slightest flickering clue what the hell you’re talkin about.

[quote]skaz05 wrote:
So, Republican = sister fuckin’ inbred piece of white trash hillbilly shit.

Democrat = Not a redneck inbred sister fuckin’ piece of white trash hillbilly shit.

Great, got it.

You know, I get so confused sometimes about how to label people, especially people who like to talk about polotiks! It’s websites like these that get me back on track! Thanks guys![/quote]

I think you’re mistaken. If there’s anything I’ve learned on this forum, it’s that:

Obama= Stalin/Khrushchev
Bush= Hitler

(PS our country = fuct)

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
GimpFace

Yes. There’s people out there that insisted Obama was Muslim because of his name. There were people that believed said idiots because they will believe whatever they have to in order to keep a black man from being president.[/quote]

I dont believe Americans are dumb, thats like saying English people all wear bowler hats.

I wear one, but thats beside the point.

I do find it easier to swallow that there is a deep level of mistrust against non white people though.

[quote]GimpFace wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
GimpFace

Yes. There’s people out there that insisted Obama was Muslim because of his name. There were people that believed said idiots because they will believe whatever they have to in order to keep a black man from being president.

I dont believe Americans are dumb, thats like saying English people all wear bowler hats.

I wear one, but thats beside the point.

I do find it easier to swallow that there is a deep level of mistrust against non white people though.

[/quote]

No, the problem isn’t with is mixed-race. If anything, that’s an asset to his electability.

An no, most Americans do NOT believe that Obama = muslim because of his name. There are some, to be sure, but they mostly live in trailers in the deep South I believe :).

People don’t like him because of his policies, which are very left leaning, his inexperience at anything remotely related to being in charge of ANYTHING seriously related to governance or legislation, or his perceived hypocrisy with the whole “hope and change” thing vs. his past associations with rather… interesting characters such as Ayers and Wright, etc. To this last group of people people, his associations with these people cast aspersions on his integrity, if there is such a thing with a politician. At the least, they belie his written speeches.

The name calling is a way to associate his name with his positions in the talk radio (because his full name does have a very different sound), or just a cheap way to sling mud around. Usually both.

Someone will correct me if I’m wrong, I’m sure. But that’s how I see it. There aren’t as many completely retarded people willing to believe he’s muslim b/c of his name as others here would have you believe.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

Don’t you have a burning weiner-schnitzel to worry about or something. You haven’t the slightest flickering clue what the hell you’re talkin about.[/quote]

We are still accepting applications for the position of “reasonably smart left-of-center representative” for the PWI threads.

Schwarzfahrer submitted his application, filled out in crayon, and forgot to wear pants to the interview.

As is, the position has yet to be filled. It’s been vacant for some time.

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Tiribulus wrote:

Don’t you have a burning weiner-schnitzel to worry about or something. You haven’t the slightest flickering clue what the hell you’re talkin about.

We are still accepting applications for the position of “reasonably smart left-of-center representative” for the PWI threads.

Schwarzfahrer submitted his application, filled out in crayon, and forgot to wear pants to the interview.

As is, the position has yet to be filled. It’s been vacant for some time.

[/quote]

Speaking of -

I haven’t seen 100M around here is quite some time. I guess Hilary missing out on the nomination took it out of him.

He was one that was actually fun to fight with.

[quote]rainjack wrote:

Speaking of -

I haven’t seen 100M around here is quite some time. I guess Hilary missing out on the nomination took it out of him.

He was one that was actually fun to fight with. [/quote]

Weirdly, he was - he was one of the only left-of-center folks around here that could actually take a position on given policies: taxes, judges, the environment, etc.

Entheogens is good, too. He should post more often.

The rest of the time we get refried Bush Derangement Syndrome:

“I think [Democratic nominee/favored position/policy approach] doesn’t make good sense.”

“Oh yeah, oh yeah, oh yeah…like Chimpy McHitler ever made sense in, like, his whole life??? Like Bush did it right??? Oh yeah, because Bush really, like, ever…”

In fact, I think there is a Bush Derangement Reply Generator somewhere, and it serves as shorthand here in PWI.

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
they have a masochistic longing for a strong state that… sends their sons to die in various developing countries.[/quote]

You mean in places like Somalia, Vietnam and Korea? Please correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe Democratic administrations were in control of the White House during these periods.

[quote]Beowolf wrote:

Whens the last time you heard Bill Clinton’s, Ronald Reagan’s, Jimmy Carter’s, etc ad infinitum’s middle name? (John Quincy Adams and the Bushs don’t count as their middle names are used to show who they are).[/quote]

When is it wrong to use their middle name? Why is it wrong to use a persons middle name? If there was some statement made about it, that would be different, but there wasn’t.

Just like it is not wrong to say William Jefferson Blythe III, (Or William Jefferson Clinton,) Or George Herbert Walker Bush, or Hillary Road-Ham Clinton. (Ok, maybe that last one is different.)[quote]

So, if you’re saying it, it probably IS to try and connect him to Saddam, subconsciously of course.[/quote]

Are you sure about that? I can’t say I really knew the guy, but he does contend that it is a sign of respect to use a persons full name. And after listening to him speak after the event, if he actually meant something because of it, I actually believe he would have proudly said that he meant it.[quote]

And John Stewart is a COMEDIAN. Why does everyone think he’s the left’s version of Bill O’Reilly? People KNOW he’s joking. Duh. Use logic people…
[/quote]

Yes he is a comedian. And he did do a joke about Obama’s name, but there was no outcry. (And no there should not have been.) But there is when a person simply uses the persons middle name, when there should not have been there either.

The point still stands, regardless of whether it was a comedian or not. The comedian is the one who made the statements, not the speaker. The speaker only used the person’s full name, and nobody can give a single good reason as to why it is wrong to use a person’s full name. The whole argument is a joke.

And I do know what comedy is, I have done stand up comedy. (I just flew into town and boy do my balls itch.) But people actually get their news from his show. They think they are getting real news, and that is just sad.

Isn’t the Democrat custom to use middle initials? FDR, JFK, LBJ…BHO? Right?