But seriously, writing things like “forliar” and “obuma” make you look pretty sad, even for a troll. Take a leaf from HH’s book and at least try to have SOME dignity.
Mak, I think you are a reasonable guy, even as we don’t agree on a number of subjects.
Is the Mick28’s name-calling - which you clearly dislike - worse than slandering everyone you disagree with a “bigot”? Yes or no?
I disagree with him and he has never called me anything.
[quote]Mick28 wrote:
orion wrote:
Makavali wrote:
Mick28 wrote:
Hey Forliar do you feel better yet? No? Okay…keep posting.
Excellent post, would definitely recommend.
But seriously, writing things like “forliar” and “obuma” make you look pretty sad, even for a troll. Take a leaf from HH’s book and at least try to have SOME dignity.
Dude, not having any dignity is his USP.
You disrespecting anyone is like Joe Biden making fun of someone for verbal gaffs.
You always come up short on these threads, but you’re too stupid to notice so…you keep on posting.
[/quote]
I am sure that from your point of view it must seem that way.
But seriously, writing things like “forliar” and “obuma” make you look pretty sad, even for a troll. Take a leaf from HH’s book and at least try to have SOME dignity.
Dude, not having any dignity is his USP.
You disrespecting anyone is like Joe Biden making fun of someone for verbal gaffs.
You always come up short on these threads, but you’re too stupid to notice so…you keep on posting.
I am sure that from your point of view it must seem that way.
Yes…very good…as I said: you always come up short on these threads, but you’re too stupid to notice so…you keep on posting.
[/quote]
In case you missed it, every major medical and mental health organization has concluded, based on 40 years of research, that people don’t choose their sexual orientation and they can’t change it. Would you like the quotes again?
I hate to say it but this is the reason that some have calle you “forliar”.
I have posted study after study which clearly demonstrates that many so called gay men have become heterosexual through various forms of therapy. They have checked with these men up to 5 and 10 years after their therapy and many are happily married not having any thoughts of sex with another man.
Honest question for you Zeb: Were these “studies” from the same source you posted that claimed that homosexual marriage is part of a plot by central bankers to create a world government? My guess is that they are.
Human beings, as they are now, cannot be ruled under one government. The only way to make people ready for the leash is when their only loyalty is to the State. When marriage is destroyed, when there are no families anymore, when there are no friendships (see TC’s article about friendship), when all competing loyalties have been destroyed, then people will be ready.
I wonder if you realise how insane you sound. It doesn’t concern you that most educated people in the world would think you’re a nut?
Never read any Orwell have you?
[/quote]
Orwell is /fiction/. You need to start living in the real world.
In case you missed it, every major medical and mental health organization has concluded, based on 40 years of research, that people don’t choose their sexual orientation and they can’t change it. Would you like the quotes again?
I hate to say it but this is the reason that some have calle you “forliar”.
I have posted study after study which clearly demonstrates that many so called gay men have become heterosexual through various forms of therapy. They have checked with these men up to 5 and 10 years after their therapy and many are happily married not having any thoughts of sex with another man.
Honest question for you Zeb: Were these “studies” from the same source you posted that claimed that homosexual marriage is part of a plot by central bankers to create a world government? My guess is that they are.
Human beings, as they are now, cannot be ruled under one government. The only way to make people ready for the leash is when their only loyalty is to the State. When marriage is destroyed, when there are no families anymore, when there are no friendships (see TC’s article about friendship), when all competing loyalties have been destroyed, then people will be ready.
I wonder if you realise how insane you sound. It doesn’t concern you that most educated people in the world would think you’re a nut?
Never read any Orwell have you?
Orwell is /fiction/. You need to start living in the real world.[/quote]
You mean the one where several states are now considering laws to forbid putting chips inside of people (its being done), to track them? Where your every move can be tracked if you use a credit card? Where your cell phone can be used to listen in, unless you remove the battery?
Uh…okay…
In case you missed it, every major medical and mental health organization has concluded, based on 40 years of research, that people don’t choose their sexual orientation and they can’t change it. Would you like the quotes again?
I hate to say it but this is the reason that some have calle you “forliar”.
I have posted study after study which clearly demonstrates that many so called gay men have become heterosexual through various forms of therapy. They have checked with these men up to 5 and 10 years after their therapy and many are happily married not having any thoughts of sex with another man.
Honest question for you Zeb: Were these “studies” from the same source you posted that claimed that homosexual marriage is part of a plot by central bankers to create a world government? My guess is that they are.
Human beings, as they are now, cannot be ruled under one government. The only way to make people ready for the leash is when their only loyalty is to the State. When marriage is destroyed, when there are no families anymore, when there are no friendships (see TC’s article about friendship), when all competing loyalties have been destroyed, then people will be ready.
I wonder if you realise how insane you sound. It doesn’t concern you that most educated people in the world would think you’re a nut?
Never read any Orwell have you?
Orwell is /fiction/. You need to start living in the real world.[/quote]
But seriously, writing things like “forliar” and “obuma” make you look pretty sad, even for a troll. Take a leaf from HH’s book and at least try to have SOME dignity.
Mak, I think you are a reasonable guy, even as we don’t agree on a number of subjects.
Is the Mick28’s name-calling - which you clearly dislike - worse than slandering everyone you disagree with a “bigot”? Yes or no?[/quote]
I don’t necessarily agree with Forlife’s assumption that you are a bigot. I think you are misguided, but not a bigot.
Also, I have disagreed with Forlife on occasion and I’ve never been called a bigot by him. Mick, however, consistently gos out of his way to type out things like “obuma”. OK Mick, you don’t like him, we get it.
But seriously, writing things like “forliar” and “obuma” make you look pretty sad, even for a troll. Take a leaf from HH’s book and at least try to have SOME dignity.
Mak, I think you are a reasonable guy, even as we don’t agree on a number of subjects.
Is the Mick28’s name-calling - which you clearly dislike - worse than slandering everyone you disagree with a “bigot”? Yes or no?[/quote]
I don’t necessarily agree with Forlife’s assumption that you are a bigot. I think you are misguided, but not a bigot.
Also, I have disagreed with Forlife on occasion and I’ve never been called a bigot by him. Mick, however, consistently gos out of his way to type out things like “obuma”. OK Mick, you don’t like him, we get it.
You claimed that he called anyone disagreeing with him a “bigot”.
That is factually false and since I quoted you it is there for all to see.
I do not need to be sober to deal with you.[/quote]
No, dipshit - Mak was complaining about Mick28’s name-calling, and I asked if he considered slandering someone a “bigot” was in fact just as bad or worse…
…which is what Forlife, not Mick28, is guilty of.
Mick28 hasn’t called anyone a bigot, and I never said he did.
I wanted to know why Mak - for example - expressed disapproval at Mick28’s name-calling, but has little to say about Forlife’s.
Now I get it - you just aren’t that strong a reader.
I don’t necessarily agree with Forlife’s assumption that you are a bigot. I think you are misguided, but not a bigot.
Also, I have disagreed with Forlife on occasion and I’ve never been called a bigot by him. Mick, however, consistently gos out of his way to type out things like “obuma”. OK Mick, you don’t like him, we get it.[/quote]
HOw about that - Makavali took one read and got it instantly. Thanks for the thoughtufl reply, Mak. I knew you were one of the bright ones.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
Brother Chris wrote:
Makavali wrote:
Brother Chris wrote:
If you really want to visit someone, here is a trick, in the hospital if you say you’re their pastor, most of the time they will allow you through as long as there is not a police escort with them.
I thought lying was a sin. And why should he even have to?
Lying is a sin, but saying you’re a pastor or a preacher does not mean he is a religious leader.
Your retarded argument still fails to show why he should have to say that he is something his is not to gain access to his partner in hospital.[/quote]
Who cares, would you rather have an ideological debate with the head nurse or would rather just go see the guy? I am not disagreeing with him, he should be able to go see the person in the hospital. Just like I should be able to see my girlfriend, but I can’t, so instead of having a stick up my ass I just do what I have to do. And I like how you call my argument retarded, when I am not presenting him an argument at all, in this situation. I am offering him a solution!
Yet instead of taking care of business like he wants people to think he is or other people want to seem, everyone wants to have a debate about it. Plus, this “gay rights” thing still should be a state to state decision. I do not want California’s funky ass knowledge screwing with my states laws, even though that seems the way of America. Just follow California, they are doing it right.
[quote]forlife wrote:
Brother Chris wrote:
I have to disagree with you, I know quit a few people who have gone straight.
Talk with one of those people and let me know if they don’t still find someone of the same sex attractive at some level, if they’re really being honest with themselves. I “went straight” for 20 years, but that didn’t mean I stopped finding guys attractive.
In case you missed it, every major medical and mental health organization has concluded, based on 40 years of research, that people don’t choose their sexual orientation and they can’t change it. Would you like the quotes again?[/quote]
Actually, I am in touch with two of them at the moment, one is a man, and one is a woman. The man admitted to me early on that he was just doing it for the attention, the woman admits that she finds woman attractive, because well most woman find other woman attractive. She however admits she does not find woman sexually attractive any more. She confused her search for attention with her search of a lesbian partner.
You claimed that he called anyone disagreeing with him a “bigot”.
That is factually false and since I quoted you it is there for all to see.
I do not need to be sober to deal with you.
No, dipshit - Mak was complaining about Mick28’s name-calling, and I asked if he considered slandering someone a “bigot” was in fact just as bad or worse…
…which is what Forlife, not Mick28, is guilty of.
Mick28 hasn’t called anyone a bigot, and I never said he did.
I wanted to know why Mak - for example - expressed disapproval at Mick28’s name-calling, but has little to say about Forlife’s.
Now I get it - you just aren’t that strong a reader.[/quote]
Dude, what you wrote can be seen one page back.
For realz.
You also left out the part of my post which where I quoted you which would have immediately shown what you claimed.