[quote]Game_over wrote:
mmm mmm good. myself loves details and plenty of them. a log without details is like gettin fucked with no reach around…wait…that sounds wrong… um well lets just say its not good and leave it at that. Please proceed keeper of the holy grail camaro :)[/quote]
Well,
My take on the blow up is that, and I will give credit where credit is due, Kroby is right about the logs I note having extra material,(fluff if you want), that isn’t always what some people are after.
He’s right about that.
But, the poster has control of HIMSELF, not the thread. Therefore, it’s pointless to say to the op, hey do this or that, unless it’s having to do with something the op said that is untrue, or dangerously misrepresenting use of AAS, you follow me? None of that is/was the case here. It is simply that Kroby wants more details of a test/tren cycle, and he doesn’t want to sift through the thread if it doesn’t pertain to that. Well, I’m sorry, but I found that offensive and insulting when he said to list stats from dd/mm/yy etc, and carried on with his mini rant.
There is no real time log of yet here.
It just boils down to him not paying attention to the fact that the log isn’t rolling yet, and mistakenly griping about it. I asked him about his log, he says, oh you want me to photocopy it etc,…Yeah it’s fucking irritating isn’t it Kroby? Well, that’s what you said to me, and it didn’t make sense in the context of what’s been in this thread.
I said I see his point, I agknowledged it. But he’s yet to say he sees my point, can we all see that now?
So enough with it, this is my final, final answer about it.
Kroby, I’ve aplogized to you, I’m not admitting I was wrong, only that I didn’t take the time to communicate it in a nicer way. So, the balls in your court.
ToneBone