[quote]bushidobadboy wrote:
The reason a test only cycle gives you an undesirable look/feel is because you are not controlling your E tightly enough.
EQ should IMO be run longer than 10 weeks, given the ester length.
Bushy[/quote]
I dont get a undesireable look bushy, i look fucking stacked man! Its more that i am a very harsh critic, and the gains i get from test - while impressive, are a little softer than some other compounds - such as deca.
Maybe i didnt expalin properly.
I obviously run an AI alongside - from the beginning, and have no troubles… not that others would notice, but I DO. Softness-wise at least. The muscles are hard and strong, by softness i just mean around the edges compared to gains on other compounds - i know this is the nature of Test, but that is why i am looking at adding some eq… so…?!
Would it tighten up the gains a little? Or should i go all out, run a long and high dose of Test (not 1g saps!) and keep calories moderate to curtail any excess fat storage that will occur.
The point is, when i have done some very nice moderate (200mg) cycles of deca, i have eaten plenty - but it has given me a beautifully chiselled, and with proviron, DRY look.
With Test this is harder to achieve - proviron (which i failed to mention i run with ALL stacks) or not… So should i suck it up - eat clean, minimize excess fat, maximise clean bulk, and go for a decent test only cycle…
Or do the same, but with less test and more equipose to harden and chisel the look a bit more.
Thats what i am asking.
i am NOT one to bulk forsaking all aesthetic. I am not talking no higher than 10% BF here, but no more than 15% tops.
Joe