[quote]PGJ wrote:
vroom wrote:
Hmm, I see the vindictive folks come out for all issues.
Isn’t it sufficient the person is convicted of the crimes committed and serves the punishment?
What does it help to suggest they should have their pension and benefits appropriated? All that means is that we’d end up footing the bills for this person for their rest of their life… because who’s going to hire an ex-con who does coke in class to teach?
Keep in mind, while a bad influence, this person didn’t take any hostages, give or sell drugs to children, threaten anyone, or in all likelihood cause any emotional trauma.
Sure, it’s absolutely freaking ludicrous, ridiculous and stupendous, but try to keep things in perspective.
Dude, this was a TEACHER, responsible for the wellfare of her students, snorting COCAINE IN THE CLASSROOM. What don’t you get? She didn’t get busted doing drugs in her house. She did it in the classroom! Yes, she should lose her pension. She destroyed the trust and confidence we place in teachers. She committed a felony in the classroom in front of 4th graders. Why is this hard to understand? This is a bad thing.
“All that means is that we’d end up footing the bills for this person for their rest of their life… because who’s going to hire an ex-con who does coke in class to teach?”
She should have thought of that herself. Not my fault, she should be punished. No free ride because I’m worried about her future employment opportunities.
Taking her pension sends a message. Think about the whole, not the individual. I doubt this was a “first time” for this teacher. What else has she done that she got away with?
Come on, guys. This is about the safety of our children, and you want to go soft. Why do we always worry about the criminals in this country?
[/quote]
Her drug problem is really just a cry for help. She just needs love. I think a court-mandated group hug would be sufficient.
DB