It seems to be that lots of his attacks are projection. Maybe most of them. I am starting to believe he was born in Kenya.
I heard this on either here or on reddit, but thought it was clever.
2 Likes
Fox reporter:
āI completed searching all of Tony Bobulinskiās emails. They establish:
ā¢the āChairmanā is China.
ā¢ NO ROLE for Joe Biden in emails/docs
ā¢ Tony Bobulinski states himself there are NO OTHER MEMBERS besides Hunter Biden, Jim Biden, Rob Walker, James Gillar, and Bobulinskiā
Tell me, all of you who were sure this was a real story - whatās it like to get duped, over and over and over again?
1 Like
Why yes, yes they still are blocked.
If itās no big deal, why all the lies? Why is the media terrified of this story?
I guess you donāt know, that scandal is ongoing. Durham is still collecting evidence and a report is forth coming.
But, what about Trump!
Sad.
Yeah, it said there was zero evidence of collusion. Tough shit.
So far the tactics I have seen are:
- deny, call it Russian disinformation
- slam the sources
- minimize the scandal
- A massive, unprecedented amount of āwhat-aboutismā
Losing credibility?
I just linked you to media debunking the story. The media arenāt afraid of it - theyāre running towards it, proving it to be false.
How awful it must be to be one of those people who are fooled all of the time.
1 Like
Hereās a great summary of whatās happening from The Atlantic:
Donald Trump is trying to run his favorite play one more time: spreading unverified but salacious accusations, demanding that they be investigated, and then using the fact of the investigation to convince the public that something must be wrong. The biggest unanswered question of this election, with just 11 days to go, is whether he can pull it off one more time.
Well, heās committed to it.
If he lies in the interview, what would be the legal repercussions?
Ok, maybe Iām a drooling dumb dumb, but in what way did it debunk the story? It seems to be simply saying there is no corporate record of Joe Bidenās involvement. Which youād expect having looked at the messages stressing the importance of keeping the Big Guyās involvement on the down low.
Youāre talking about the WSJ article, correct?
We have a man putting his name on the record, being interviewed by the FBI that Joeās involvement was kept OFF the record.
Yeah, I donāt think so. Itās gaining steam. Itās like the most googled subject right now.
There is an actual live witness. And heās talking to the FBIā¦
You moron. Someone already posted that two posts above yours. Try reading.
A witness amounts to hearsay / rumors. A media corporation could potentially get burned bad if they base their journalism on stuff like this. They need to be sure about things if they want to stay credible long term.
Just my opinion. I wouldnāt touch this yet if I were them.
They get called fake news but when they wait to make sure something is true, the pats of the world whine like babies.
I donāt know about legal repercussions but he could probably get hired by Trump.
They debunked it? Really. A tweet by one journalist is a debunking? As if the media hasnāt been complicit in the cover up themselves? They are part of the story. They made the story far worse. They tried to bury it and it exploded. The NY Post is still banned from twitter for reporting a legitimate story.
If there is nothing to this story why its it only getting bigger and worse for Joe? Why would Joe be listed if he is using his family as intermediaries? Thatās how you go about keeping your name off documents. And unlike Russia, we have an actual witness who is providing more evidence in the form of 3 cell phones to the FBI today.
And more evidence is coming out that this all started around 2015, while he was VP.
More and more is coming out and the mediaās efforts to hide the story has only made it bigger than ever, perhaps bigger than it should have ever been. So, no. Itās very far from debunked. Itās getting bigger all the time.
It may be legitimate. The problem is that they canāt prove that it is. Until they can prove it is legitimate it should not have been published.
Maybe heās just a jilted business partner who got screwed and got pissed and is out for revenge. It doesnāt change the story that Joe was taking money the crooked way and perhaps even as an acting VP.
The story could just stop here. Maybe there is nothing more than what we already know. But there is enough evidence of using political power to enrich himself and itās certainly a good starting point for an investigation.
The FBI sent 15 agents to investigate a garage pull-down rope. There is certainly enough here to peak the FBIās interest. They have the laptop, cell phones and a corroborating witness. They investigated much more with far less.