True, true.
The same people who swore the last scandal - Obamagate! - was a thing.
Also, Iām not following the logic - assuming this is all true (and I donāt), are now saying lying and drifting and corruption are disqualifying? Yeah? Then who are you able to vote for, Trumpkins?
I remember when just claiming 4 anon sources got people going around here. This Bobulinski guy is putting his name out there and turning over material to the FBI. Wonder if twitter still has the NYPost blockedā¦
Heh.
Or Russia-gate!! Oh wait, that was a thing.
Was that the one where some of Trumpās bros went to jail and the investigator found four acts that met the qualifications for obstruction of justice but said I canāt be doing that because I donāt have the authority? And his handpicked person said nothing to see here letās move on.
I feel like Trump fans completely forget what happened and think it said absolutely nothing and nothing came out of it. It said a lot of bad shit and put some people in jail. Just found that because he was the President it wasnāt Muellerās job to decide.
No itās the one where Hillary Clintonās campaign conceived and put forth the idea of Trump colluding with Russia to take the attention off her illegal email server.
Glad I could clear that up for you.
For things unrelated to Russia collusion. I feel like anti-Trumpers always forget that.
Think you might need to do some rereading of what the report said.
Mueller spent almost 200 pages describing ānumerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign.ā He found that āa Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.ā He also found that āa Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operationsā against the Clinton campaign and then released stolen documents.
While Mueller was unable to establish a conspiracy between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians involved in this activity, he made it clear that ā[a] statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.ā In fact, Mueller also wrote that the āinvestigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.ā
Mueller found that Trump campaign members Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner met with Russian nationals in Trump Tower in New York June 2016 for the purpose of receiving disparaging information about Clinton as part of āRussia and its governmentās support for Mr. Trump,ā according to an email message arranging the meeting. This meeting did not amount to a criminal offense, in part, because Mueller was unable to establish āwillfulness,ā that is, that the participants knew that their conduct was illegal. Mueller was also unable to conclude that the information was a āthing of valueā that exceeded $25,000, the requirement for campaign finance to be a felony, as opposed to a civil violation of law. But the fact that the conduct did not technically amount to conspiracy does not mean that it was acceptable. Trump campaign members welcomed foreign influence into our election and then compromised themselves with the Russian government by covering it up.ā
Did you read the Mueller report?
You sure?
And letās not forget Manafort, who shared polling data with and briefed Kilimnik according to the (Republican led) Senate Intelligence Committee report.
They do that all the time. Iāll let someone smarter than me respond to that:
Umā¦thatās kind of exactly what that means. To quote Gertrude Stein, āthereās no there thereā.
Donāt have time to find the link right now, but Iām pretty sure it was proven the meeting was not collusion. Itās not illegal to get dirt on your opponent, just ask Hillary.
This guy says it best:
Hillary, friend. Hillary did that.
Hilary was in the meeting with Trump Jr and Kushner and Russian nationals?
Hilary was found to obstruct justice in the Mueller report?
Iām not trying to do the whole Russia all over thing I promise. That has been beaten up countless times on this forum. Merely that idea that āthey investigated the Russia stuff and found nothingā isnāt even close to accurate.
The only reason sheās not in prison is that Trump is not the incumbent.
Had Trump been President for the last four years, he wouldnāt have allowed a murderer and a criminal mastermind that is HRC to walk around freely, nor would he allow the tentacles of Hunterās criminal empire to spread aroud the world unchecked.
Maybe heāll listen to the ālock her upā chants (in 2020) and arrest her once and the GOP takes control of the executive and judicial branches.
Drain the swamp?
Itās the new Obamagate.
Former vice president says he had no involvement; corporate records reviewed by The Wall Street Journal show no role for Joe Biden
And that was under the extremely generous assumption that the e-mails are true.
Edit: Season Two repeated the exact same plot formula from Season One with the actors being noticeably older and less coherent. While the longtime fans of the show will religiously binge watch all installments, the glaring problem of the show runner remains - keeping the casual viewers interested. A less believable villain in Season Two may be one of the reasons for the lacklustre performance.
Rudy Giuliana is one creepy, despicable dude. Understandably, his own daughter is urging voters to āvote this toxic administration out of officeā.
But maybe his role in the just-released film will make him more likeable:
Donāt understand the extreme Trump hatred, but defending a set of pigs like the Clintons?
Haha please.
Iām not reading (unless I missed a post) defending of Clintonās. More that itās tiring watching Trump do the same playbook of 2016. Ironically the most likely person to be locked up at some point is the guy calling for others to be.
