Obviously theres no way in the world anyone can know if that’s true or not.
Might as well just say that Yates was running 20g of test per day just to see who can say the craziest thing. I just dont see the point of posting something that has no way of being corroborated.
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
Obviously theres no way in the world anyone can know if that’s true or not.
Might as well just say that Yates was running 20g of test per day just to see who can say the craziest thing. I just dont see the point of posting something that has no way of being corroborated. [/quote]
^ This post has the signed, irrelevant, who-cares-for, Xilinx seal of approval.
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
Obviously theres no way in the world anyone can know if that’s true or not.
Might as well just say that Yates was running 20g of test per day just to see who can say the craziest thing. I just dont see the point of posting something that has no way of being corroborated. [/quote]
^ This post has the signed, irrelevant, who-cares-for, Xilinx seal of approval.[/quote]
I think you two are looking at the post with blinders on, focusing on whether or not it is actually Yates’s cycle…agreed that really doesn’t have a lot of merit…but I think there is something to be gained by discussing the pros and cons of the cycle, and whether or not it is actually even feasible…
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
Obviously theres no way in the world anyone can know if that’s true or not.
Might as well just say that Yates was running 20g of test per day just to see who can say the craziest thing. I just dont see the point of posting something that has no way of being corroborated. [/quote]
^ This post has the signed, irrelevant, who-cares-for, Xilinx seal of approval.[/quote]
I think you two are looking at the post with blinders on, focusing on whether or not it is actually Yates’s cycle…agreed that really doesn’t have a lot of merit…but I think there is something to be gained by discussing the pros and cons of the cycle, and whether or not it is actually even feasible…
That’s my 2 pence[/quote]
A discussion of whether it’s feasible is best had by people with knowledge of the cycles that pro’s use. A post was made about this by Dante. No one here (that posts with any sort of regularity) has a clue about what pro’s are doing or had done 15+ years ago.
BBB is the closest thing we have, working with Zack Khan for rehab, but there’s no reason at all for him to even consider giving out that sort of info, if he even knows to begin with.
But for diplomacy’s sake. The merits of that cycle? 300 pounds of LBM. The cons? 300lbs of LBM with blood as thick as chocolate syrup and blood pressure high enough to move it.
Dorian himself posted this on the forums on his website a while back (that is what i have read from anabolicminds or w/e the fuck the other forum was called)
There’s a point of diminishing returns with any drug, beyond which increasing dose will intensify sides but not so much gains…this is pretty insane to me. I’m pretty sure a fraction of these doses would put most mortals in the hospital, maybe the psych ward. Then again, I’m nowhere a pro. 2g test/week is insane to me, let alone 5…but who’s to say this isn’t feasible. I can’t afford to eat enough to justify these doses, let alone buy the drugs.
Unless I’m way off, you also only have so many hormone receptors in your body. I know they can upregulate and that there are other channels by which anabolism occurs, but still…there has to be some point at which your body just can’t do anything with the extra hormones.
[quote]bushidobadboy wrote:
Lets just say that I know a guy who isn’t far from 300lbs, who uses only 1.3g total gear per week. No orals and minimal GH.
On the other hand, I know a guy (we’ll call him ‘Dick’) who is in hi early 20s, fancies himself as a contender (won a Jnr Mr Wales) and has been recently using 60ml (yes you read that right) per week. You’ll have to forgive my ‘ml’ and not ‘mg’ total, since I don’t have any more info than the total volume.
He recently competed and didn’t even place. Too much gear, not enough brains.
[quote]bushidobadboy wrote:
Lets just say that I know a guy who isn’t far from 300lbs, who uses only 1.3g total gear per week. No orals and minimal GH.
On the other hand, I know a guy (we’ll call him ‘Dick’) who is in hi early 20s, fancies himself as a contender (won a Jnr Mr Wales) and has been recently using 60ml (yes you read that right) per week. You’ll have to forgive my ‘ml’ and not ‘mg’ total, since I don’t have any more info than the total volume.
He recently competed and didn’t even place. Too much gear, not enough brains.
BBB[/quote]
So…Zack Khan uses only 1.3g? lol
What about insulin with this mystery 300 lber?[/quote]
[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
3 grams of clomid a day? they would be blind! lmao…
30,000iu of hcg a day? why bother? that dosage alone would desensitize the leydig cells to lh…
cycle was written by a troll[/quote]
You make some haste judgements in alot of your posts, Mr I-know-everything.
Like BONEZ said, there is no way we could ever know if this cycle was/is real or not unless you speak to the user himself. I have heard of pro’s using massive amounts of drugs, I personally know a guy in my gym using up to 40ml of sustanon a week equating to 10g of test.