Quite a few, and there were plenty post 9/11, just not on the same scale.
The rate certainly seems to be accelerating.
They forgot several right here in Detroit.
My best friend’s friend died in this one. I always thought it was a terrorist attack. Sort of like a test run for 9-11:
An Egyptian airline pilot runs a planeload of 217 passengers into the water after uttering a Qur’anic prayer
How about this one:
7/4/2002 USA Los Angeles, CA 2 0 Muslim man pulls out a gun at the counter of an Israeli airline and kills two people.
This one reminds me of the current case:
A Muslim psychiatrist guns down thirteen unarmed soldiers while yelling praises to Allah.
Both men were described to have “snapped.”
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Quite a few, and there were plenty post 9/11, just not on the same scale.
The rate certainly seems to be accelerating. [/quote]
Most people don’t understand what an ‘extremist’ is. An extremist is someone who takes some idea TO ITS EXTREMES. In other words, to its LOGICAL CONCLUSIONS.
The killers are simply taking Islam seriously and logically.
Time for these folks to go home.
all radical muslims should be booted out of this country, puth them on a tire and just push them out to sea.
^ You guys should email the author about the missing ones. I know there’s more.
fixed
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Quite a few, and there were plenty post 9/11, just not on the same scale.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/AmericanAttacks.htm
The rate certainly seems to be accelerating.
Most people don’t understand what an ‘extremist’ is. An extremist is someone who takes some idea TO ITS EXTREMES. In other words, to its LOGICAL CONCLUSIONS.
The killers are simply taking Islam seriously and logically.
Time for these folks to go home.
[/quote]
Yes.
I’ve devised a legal framework under which this might be accomplished.
Since Islam divides the world into “Dar Al-Islam” (The abode of submission) and “Dar Al-Harb” (the abode of war), it stands to reason that anyone who subscribes to the religion of Islam is at war with non-Muslims. This is further sanctioned in Surahs 9:5, 9:29, Bukhari book 4:52, and countless other places.
Unbelievers are to be fought because of their unbelief if they refuse to pay jizya and submit to servitude (dhimma) (see also the Pact of Umar and The Book of Revenue):
http://www.isbs.com/partnumber.asp?cid=27382&pnid=290729
Further, Islam and shari’ah are inseparable. This means that Muslims, by definition, must subscribe to an alternative constitution for the global Islamic community (Ummah) and not the US Constitution. Actually, by definition, they must be at war with the US Constitution and must seek to deprive unbelievers of their Constitutional rights under shari’ah and dhimma.
In my view, this constitutes treason, defined in Article III Section 2 of the Constitution thusly:
Clearly Muslims, by subscribing to Islam, fit this definition. Congress has the power to declare the punishment, which should obviously be exile.
How many of these are, genuine Muslims, and how many are some Negro Americans on a ‘Praise Be To Allah!,’ kick.
I mean for real, half of these are NoI, which is about as Muslim, as Mormon is Protestant.
[quote]3IdSpetsnaz wrote:
How many of these are, genuine Muslims, and how many are some Negro Americans on a ‘Praise Be To Allah!,’ kick.
I mean for real, half of these are NoI, which is about as Muslim, as Mormon is Protestant.[/quote]
NoI took a real dive a long time ago, IMO. I doubt there are many who actually subscribe to that silly sect anymore. One of the guys at my church has a Muslim first name b/c his parents were/are black Muslims in the NoI. You also don’t see many black football players with Arab names anymore, which hints to me that blacks in this country realized Islam was a raw deal awhile ago.
These should simply be discouraged from further participation in NoI by pointing out to them how many blacks are property of Arabs, how the Arab slave trade in blacks continues to this day, how Muhammad owned blacks, and how Islam is the religion of Arab supremacism.
NoI is some religion loosely based off Islam, it is an American phenonmenon that teaches black supremacy.
As I said, you are relating something like Mormon crimes, to Christian aggression, and that wouldn’t be entirely accurate. The motives behind NoI violence are more similar to Black Panther party or Symbionese Liberation Front, than they are to global jihad.
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Quite a few, and there were plenty post 9/11, just not on the same scale.
The rate certainly seems to be accelerating. [/quote]
The amount of killed americans on that list is considerably bigger before 9/11 than after it.
And jihad is holy war, right, and therefore acts of terrorism from a western point of view. How can killing your wife or daughter, for whatever reasons, be considered an act of terrorism?
[quote]3IdSpetsnaz wrote:
NoI is some religion loosely based off Islam, it is an American phenonmenon that teaches black supremacy.
As I said, you are relating something like Mormon crimes, to Christian aggression, and that wouldn’t be entirely accurate. The motives behind NoI violence are more similar to Black Panther party or Symbionese Liberation Front, than they are to global jihad.[/quote]
NoI is somewhat like Liberation Theology in that both rationalize the use of voilence against the ‘oppressors’.
Liberation Theology is really just rewording the communist manifesto using the bible. I don’t know enough about NoI to say weather it is the same. But, both started around the same time. (MoL)
My two cents.
[quote]cremaster wrote:
<<< Liberation Theology is really just rewording the communist manifesto using the bible. >>>
[/quote]
I’ve been trying to tell certain people this for the last year and a half here. Exactly right.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
cremaster wrote:
<<< Liberation Theology is really just rewording the communist manifesto using the bible. >>>
I’ve been trying to tell certain people this for the last year and a half here. Exactly right.[/quote]
Same with Islam. PRCal’s been saying, with documentation, how whacked out those folks are.
I think of Muslims as one would think of a mother-in-law who hates me. Sure she’s human and yeah she has rights but she should NOT be in the same room as me.
Warm up the cargo ships.
Ok, check this CNN report out: A new “Jihad Code”:
well?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091112/ap_on_re_us/us_mosque_forfeiture
Prosecutors take steps to control assets owned by a group suspected of links to Iran
[quote]pushharder wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
…These should simply be discouraged from further participation in NoI by pointing out to them how many blacks are property of Arabs, how the Arab slave trade in blacks continues to this day, how Muhammad owned blacks, and how Islam is the religion of Arab supremacism.
Excellent point. What irony that blacks would join a religion that has enslaved more people than the next 10 religions put together over the past 1500 years.
[/quote]
Good point. I think the black muslim thing started in the 60’s as a way to rebel against images of a white Jesus. Many of the Klansmen were also “Christians” so they didnt want to assoiate with anything Christian during the black liberation movement. I really wish the current state of affairs in Muslim countries were more exposed so EVERYONE can see whats going on over there.
[quote]Gkhan wrote:
Ok, check this CNN report out: A new “Jihad Code”:
well?[/quote]
Mountain of a molehill:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2009/11/cnn-makes-mountain-out-of-molehill-trumpets-same-old-jihad-theology-as-new.html