State of the Union

[quote]Professor X wrote:
ZEB wrote:

When did we capture Hitler? Oh that’s right we never did. But nontheless we won. Hey how did that happen? Not because of people like you.

Not because of people like me? I’m in the military. Are you? I have to think like you to help this country? Do you honestly believe this? The logical conclusion is that you truly believe that anyone who disagrees with Bush on the handling of Iraq is taking away from America’s success? This is bullshit and why so many arguments are sparked. It is the self righteousness held by many claiming to be “conservatives” as if you know better than all and everyone else is a traitor somehow. All of that is implied when you tell someone in the military that Hitler was conquered because of men NOT like me. I am glad you wrote this, however…although I doubt you expected it to slip like that.[/quote]

LOL…you didn’t get it huh?

People like you are negative (regarding Iraq). And no one can tell me that those who don’t believe in the cause fight as well as those who do believe in the cause. Not that you actually fight. However, the point is the same.

And “people like you” act like a negative infection. It’s a shame that you are in the military because you are in a position to poison minds (not on purpose)…No young GI would ever walk away from a lengthy conversation with you feeling better about our cause in Iraq.

The war, any war is always first won in the hearts of the people fighting it.

Your venom spills out on these threads all the time. If it is any indication of how you actually feel about the war in yoru “military life” Heaven help those military personnel who are around you on a regular basis!

[quote]Kettle, meet Skillet. You think your opinions are a shock to anyone? I would hope most people know where I stand on many issues because I write it clearly. For me to point out to you that YOU are also read like an open book needs for you to inform me of this? It may be stating the obvious, but it appears as if you thought otherwise.

Either way, this thread isn’t about predictability in responses. [/quote]

I agree the thread is not about predicability. But, you were the first to bring it up and want to continue it. Therefore, let me point out that I have been very much against the Patriot Act and a few other things that President Bush and other conservatives stand for.

Was that predictable? Not hardly!

You on the other hand have never typed one single word on these political threads that was not predictable.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
LOL…you didn’t get it huh?

People like you are negative (regarding Iraq). And no one can tell me that those who don’t believe in the cause fight as well as those who do believe in the cause. Not that you actually fight. However, the point is the same.[/quote]

I don’t have to actually fight regardless of your intended degredation. It shows how little you are informed. There are men on the front lines right now that I treated in order to make them viable to fight. I directly help in this fight while all you do is talk from the sidelines with the nerve to pretend as if you are “better” than me when it comes to the interests of this country.

[quote]

And “people like you” act like a negative infection. It’s a shame that you are in the military because you are in a position to poison minds (not on purpose)…No young GI would ever walk away from a lengthy conversation with you feeling better about our cause in Iraq.[/quote]

This statement is pure ignorance. Why would I talk to a GI about my deep opinions of Iraq unless THEY brought it up? I treat these guys daily. Iraq never comes up in even one conversation aside from me wishing them luck when they say they are about to deploy. You can’t be this in the dark or ignorant, can you?

[quote]
The war, any war is always first won in the hearts of the people fighting it. [/quote]

This war hasn’t even been formed against a particular country. It is a “WAR on Terrorism”, that could go on for eternity. Our actions in the rebuilding of Iraq are in addition to the war thus why anyone opposed to our initial action could very well inspire others when it comes to the task at hand.

[quote]
Your venom spills out on these threads all the time. If it is any indication of how you actually feel about the war in yoru “military life” Heaven help those military personnel who are around you on a regular basis![/quote]

Why would anyone sit and talk about these opinions openly? Do you know how often any discussion like this comes up in casual conversation here? It NEVER HAPPENS. Just like you wouldn’t sit around at work and openly express your hatred for gay marriage (or would you?), no one would sit around and discuss politics here aside from the mission at hand and how it needs to be accomplished. The war in Iraq is not all the military is engaged in.

So?

[quote]
Was that predictable? Not hardly![/quote]

Uh, yes it was because you have stated it before. Who didn’t know this by now?

Again, you honestly think you have?

[quote]Professor X wrote:

I don’t have to actually fight regardless of your intended degredation. It shows how little you are informed. There are men on the front lines right now that I treated in order to make them viable to fight. I directly help in this fight while all you do is talk from the sidelines with the nerve to pretend as if you are “better” than me when it comes to the interests of this country.[/quote]

As a military man (as you say you are) you should know better than to question your commander and chief! All you do by this constant whine is harm morale.

[quote]And “people like you” act like a negative infection. It’s a shame that you are in the military because you are in a position to poison minds (not on purpose)…No young GI would ever walk away from a lengthy conversation with you feeling better about our cause in Iraq.

This statement is pure ignorance. Why would I talk to a GI about my deep opinions of Iraq unless THEY brought it up? [/quote]

So, when they bring it up it’s okay to spew your anti-Bush anti-war propaganda which in turns harms their morale?

Those who have read your many political posts understand only too well who the ignorant one is!

That is your political opinion, not fact. I wonder how you separate the two when serving?

[quote]Your venom spills out on these threads all the time. If it is any indication of how you actually feel about the war in yoru “military life” Heaven help those military personnel who are around you on a regular basis!

Why would anyone sit and talk about these opinions openly?[/quote]

But you stated that if asked you tell them how you feel. Hence one can assume it comes up. And I bet you make sure it comes up.

Oh so it’s a “hatred” you have of the war and President Bush. I see…

[quote]ZEB wrote:
As a military man (as you say you are) you should know better than to question your commander and chief! All you do by this constant whine is harm morale.[/quote]

This was truly ignorant. I have freedom of speech in this country, thank God, because of the Constitution that I pledged my loyalty to. I didn’t pledge my allegiance to any one man but to an ideal that is greater than an individual. I have every right in the world to disagree with the actions of anyone above me. It is still my duty, however, to carry out orders. I do that just fine daily. None of my current orders have anything to do with not being able to speak out on how I feel about how we went into Iraq. How is it you don’t know this?

[quote]
So, when they bring it up it’s okay to spew your anti-Bush anti-war propaganda which in turns harms their morale?[/quote]

What? I treat PATIENTS. It is not my job to discuss politics with these people as many of us have conflicting ideas and values. The same way RACE should not be an issue in patient treatment, political beliefs should play no role as well. Is this simply above you?

It has been explained to you several times. What is it you don’t get?

I have never been asked. I have never written that “if asked I will tell them how I feel”. If I have written anything close to that, it would depend on what situation I am in at the time. Are you honestly this basic? Why would I bring up such a controversial issue as nearly any political view point on the job?

Weak. I have never written anything about hatred of George Bush as I have never been able to say I HATE any man. I was raised to avoid that word at all costs because of what it entails. That means your little whine here is pointless BS clogging up my computer screen.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
ZEB wrote:
As a military man (as you say you are) you should know better than to question your commander and chief! All you do by this constant whine is harm morale.

This was truly ignorant.[/quote]

You like that word ignorant. I’ve seen you use it with many posters. In fact, everyone who disagrees with you is called ignorant in some way.

You da man…lol

You have freedom of speech? Well then why don’t you tell your commanding officer to go take a hike the next time he gives you an order?

You will soon find out exactly how much freedom of speech you have when it comes to the military.

So then you are thinking that it’s okay to tell your commanding officer to “take a hike” as long as you eventually carry out his orders.

Oh please do that…just once.

But not very many as you (and I) are on T-Nation all the time :slight_smile:

Patient: “It hurts over here doc.”

Prof: “Hold on I’m making a point to that rainjack he always gets the best of me along with that Thunder and Boston and…well all of them actually… and I’m sick of it…”

Yes, everything that pours out of yoru keyboard is Soooo above me…ha ha. You are a joke. Sorry, but you really are.

No one said it was your “job” to discuss politics. However, you stated a in a previous post when it comes up you let them know how you feel. Hence, you probably damage morale.

Got it?

Nor does it mean that anything that I have written is a lie!

But you stated that if asked you tell them how you feel. Hence one can assume it comes up. And I bet you make sure it comes up.

You wouldn’t? Then you shouldn’t have written the following on a previous post:

You see, when you write stuff like the above that leads everyone to believe that you would tell them your twisted opinions if THEY brought it up.

Don’t say it if you don’t mean it-or at least try to remember what you type.

You are stating that you never called President Bush vicious and hateful names?

You wanna bet?

[quote]That means your little whine here is pointless BS clogging up my computer screen.
[/quote]

Yet, you respond!

Hold on you better go treat more GI’s peel yourself away from the computer LOL…Oh and don’t forget to give them your opinion of the war and President Bush if THEY bring it up that is.

[quote]Jeff_with_a_G wrote:
sasquatch wrote:
So what about the speech?

Now that you’ve gotten your obligatory negative Bush–horrible speaker–blahblahblahbullshit out of the way, anything real to say.

What about the fuel initiatives?
What about permanent tax relief?
What about The effort to scale back the hatred and work together?
What about entitlement spending?

It just seems noone on this board wants to actually talk politics. Talk about potential solutions. It boils down to what party are you, who did you vote for, oh–you must be a frickin’ moron.

No one person or party is going to change the quagmire we are in. We need tough decisions and we need to take a little hit too right this ship. I wish the two parties could find at least 1-2 items they agree on and begin to propose solutions.

Fuel initiative.

I would love to see hydrogen cars by 2010. Is that pie in the sky? Probably, but if we never set some goals, we are surely never going to move forward with any resolve. Hell with coal and that right now. If we cut our automobile (oil) use in 1/2 over the next 4-5 years how much better off would we be. Wouldn’t hurt our
?supposed? global warming either.

I need an economist to step in on the taxes. We are so over taxed I believe we could live with some permanent relief, but what do we then give up. There is enmough pork around to easily lower taxes and not suffer servicewise.

Political partisanship.

Maybe the biggest problem right now. There is no effort to even try and work together. Will the next president be able to bring together the parties or is this the new way. It is so disappointing to hear good solid ideas presented knowing that in no way is anyone really looking to fulfill them.

Let’s go crazy and throw some ideas around. we may not solve anything, but you never know who’s lurking here.

What about the fuel initiatives?

Well, he’s paid lip service to this issue in all of his SOTU speeches. What makes this time any different? If the party in power were serious about this issue, they would’ve passed it 4 years ago. They do have the votes you know.
How far are we going to push this into the future anyway…2010…2020? We needed it 10 years AGO!

Permanent tax relief?

How much more relief can millionaires get any way? Lower taxes, increase spending and cut the deficit in half all at the same time? HAHAHAHA. Is he going to alter the gravitational constant of the universe while he’s at it? Gimme a fucking break.

The effort to scale back hatred?

“I’m going to be a uniter, not a divider.” If I even need to comment on this one for you, you’re a lost cause my friend. Just look around you.

What about entitlement spending?

He already made cuts to the Pell Grant program and veterans’ benefits and wants to cut veterans’ benefits AGAIN. Talk about supporting our troops in any way he can! Although I suppose all those no-bid contracts to Halliburton and all of its subsidiaries have to be paid for somehow.

I try very hard not to reply to posts on this forum anymore because I know that all of Bush’s supporters (or is it cheerleaders?) will never change their beliefs even after this country has been completely destroyed. However, when I see people trying to pat this motherfucker on the back for giving the same speech over and over again (for years), it makes me want to puke. You people think that the sun rises and sets with this guy and that he can do no wrong. Do you not see (yeah, I know its a stretch) that the party of small government and fiscal conservatism has increased the size of government (hello DHS) and given us budget deficits that are out of control? (I know, insert the appropriate 9-11 comment here as an excuse) Or are you really just blind sheep that think and see what the master wants you to? (Never mind, I know the answer to that one) He gets credit for anything (and I mean anything) good that happens and is never held accountable for anything that he’s fucked up. (Just name ONE, since you people wanna lay Katrina solely on the backs of Mayor Nagin and the governor) When exactly will “we’re at war” no longer be an acceptable excuse for everything the president does? I bet I know…when a democrat is in office. When that time comes (even though he or she will be just as big of a fuck-up as Bush) they’ll get blamed for everything under the sun but won’t be allowed any excuses whatsoever. If you’re going to be blind, deaf and ignorant the least you can do is be an equal opportunity blind, deaf and ignorant person.
So, go ahead and tell all of us how smart, free thinking, cultured, worldly, objective and informed you are. You can go on believing that shit all you want. As long as you believe what the master says to believe and you think what he says to think, you’re just deluding yourself. The truth is all over the place if you’re not afraid (that’s the real kicker isn’t it?) to look for it. If you’re truly afraid then just say so. But don’t be a fucking cheerleader who hides behind your supposedly God-fearing master and claim that you love his pretty blue suit. Because this asshole is stark naked.
George Orwell is lying in his grave today saying “Told ya so” while you people do your best impression of a two-legged sheep. Nice. The founding fathers would be proud. Excuse me while I go puke up my breakfast… [/quote]

If you had read my post–I asked for opinions on the topics covered. Not a critique of the president. So, instead of answering anything with something resembling intelligence, you chose to respond in the very way you denegrate the president for. How grown up of you jeff with a g.

I expressed the desire to remove partisanship and explore ideas and you just couldn’t quite handle the responsiblity. It’s telling to see the responses and see who has offered their own insight and who has chosen to simply hate.

Thank you for your contribution.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
bigflamer wrote:
You’re gonna jump all over my shit just because I didn’t answer your Question verbatim in my response to Zeb?

Fuck off

Guess what hot shot, this is an open forum and if my opinions piss you off, or you think they are predictible, that’s too fucking bad. Put down your purse, grab a tissue out of it, and dry your damn eyes.

Maybe you were too stupid to look it up yourself, or maybe you were implying that the costs outweigh the benefits of this war. I’m pretty sure it was the latter, but whatever. As a curtesy to your inflated ego, you can find the running total here:

http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182

Grow up.

What a fucking hypocrite. You wrote this to reprimand me somehow? I wasn’t supposed to post a certain way? But your post is written to tell me that you CAN post a certain way? WTF? Who really needs the tissues? The only one whining is you.

What is more important than your bitch fest, is the fact that as of tonight, we have spent 238,000,000,000 bucks in Iraq. Holy Crap.[/quote]

I told you this number 2 pages ago. You really do just like to bicker to bicker.

And your CONSTANT reference to anyone who differes in opinion to you as a hypocrit has run it’s course.

[quote]sasquatch wrote:

I told you this number 2 pages ago. You really do just like to bicker to bicker.

And your CONSTANT reference to anyone who differes in opinion to you as a hypocrit has run it’s course.[/quote]

Professor…doesn’t just like to bicker? Naaaaa…He lives for it :slight_smile:

Oh, and hypocrit is his second favorite word. I think ignorant is his favorite.

Zeb,

Your tactics are getting suspect and you are starting to sound a bit hateful.

Just letting you know.

[quote]ZEB wrote:

You have freedom of speech? Well then why don’t you tell your commanding officer to go take a hike the next time he gives you an order?[/quote]

How many times have I written about orders in this thread? And you still go here? there is no better word than “ignorant” for your replies. Why change it up?

[quote]
You will soon find out exactly how much freedom of speech you have when it comes to the military.[/quote]

I will soon find out how much freedom of speech I have? What are you referring to here?

[quote]
So then you are thinking that it’s okay to tell your commanding officer to “take a hike” as long as you eventually carry out his orders.[/quote]

Why would I disrepect someone above me by telling them that?

[quote]
Yes, everything that pours out of yoru keyboard is Soooo above me…ha ha. You are a joke. Sorry, but you really are.

No one said it was your “job” to discuss politics. However, you stated a in a previous post when it comes up you let them know how you feel. Hence, you probably damage morale.

Got it?[/quote]

Why am I now repeating info? It doesn’t come up so what problem do you seem to have?

[quote]

You wouldn’t? Then you shouldn’t have written the following on a previous post:

Professor stated, “Why would I talk to a GI about my dep opinions of Iraq unless THEY brought it up?”

You see, when you write stuff like the above that leads everyone to believe that you would tell them your twisted opinions if THEY brought it up.

Don’t say it if you don’t mean it-or at least try to remember what you type.[/quote]

Are you having some kind of mental breakdown? If I was ever confrtonted outside of work about my stance on an issue, I would definitely tell someone my opinion. It is not my job to bring this up at work just like religion rarely comes up at work unless brought up by someone else. Again, that would depend on the situation…but you can’t understand this?

[quote]
I have never written anything about hatred of George Bush as I have never been able to say I HATE any man. I was raised to avoid that word at all costs because of what it entails.

You are stating that you never called President Bush vicious and hateful names?[/quote]

Did you just jump from making a statement of “hating” someone to calling soemone a name? They mean the same to you? What game are you playing?

What exactly is your problem?

[quote]vroom wrote:
Zeb,

Your tactics are getting suspect and you are starting to sound a bit hateful.

Just letting you know.[/quote]

I honestly don’t think he can see it. Just like that thread he jumped in because he thought another poster was flaming me. I think the world Zeb sees is different than everyone else’s. He apparently doesn’t see his posts here as “vile” or “hateful”. I am amazed at this. He can point out the flaws of the world but can’t see his own at all.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
vroom wrote:
Zeb,

Your tactics are getting suspect and you are starting to sound a bit hateful.

Just letting you know.

I honestly don’t think he can see it. Just like that thread he jumped in because he thought another poster was flaming me. I think the world Zeb sees is different than everyone else’s. He apparently doesn’t see his posts here as “vile” or “hateful”. I am amazed at this. He can point out the flaws of the world but can’t see his own at all.
[/quote]

Kettle meet Skillet

[quote]sasquatch wrote:
Professor X wrote:
vroom wrote:
Zeb,

Your tactics are getting suspect and you are starting to sound a bit hateful.

Just letting you know.

I honestly don’t think he can see it. Just like that thread he jumped in because he thought another poster was flaming me. I think the world Zeb sees is different than everyone else’s. He apparently doesn’t see his posts here as “vile” or “hateful”. I am amazed at this. He can point out the flaws of the world but can’t see his own at all.

Kettle meet Skillet[/quote]

I am not unaware of my posting style. I also know that I wouldn’t use the tactics that Zeb has in this thread. He isn’t even approaching comments made directly. He makes up associations like “hatred” meaning “name calling” and other ridiculous actions that just add up to …what? Tell my supervisor to take a hike? I feel like I am debating with a really fiesty public school student. I do believe the difference is, I can readily state that I am often arrogant in how I write. I guarantee Zeb sees himself as “righteous”.

[quote]sasquatch wrote:
So what about the speech?

Now that you’ve gotten your obligatory negative Bush–horrible speaker–blahblahblahbullshit out of the way, anything real to say.

What about the fuel initiatives?
What about permanent tax relief?
What about The effort to scale back the hatred and work together?
What about entitlement spending?

It just seems noone on this board wants to actually talk politics. Talk about potential solutions. It boils down to what party are you, who did you vote for, oh–you must be a frickin’ moron.

No one person or party is going to change the quagmire we are in. We need tough decisions and we need to take a little hit too right this ship. I wish the two parties could find at least 1-2 items they agree on and begin to propose solutions.

Fuel initiative.

I would love to see hydrogen cars by 2010. Is that pie in the sky? Probably, but if we never set some goals, we are surely never going to move forward with any resolve. Hell with coal and that right now. If we cut our automobile (oil) use in 1/2 over the next 4-5 years how much better off would we be. Wouldn’t hurt our
?supposed? global warming either.

I need an economist to step in on the taxes. We are so over taxed I believe we could live with some permanent relief, but what do we then give up. There is enmough pork around to easily lower taxes and not suffer servicewise.

Political partisanship.

Maybe the biggest problem right now. There is no effort to even try and work together. Will the next president be able to bring together the parties or is this the new way. It is so disappointing to hear good solid ideas presented knowing that in no way is anyone really looking to fulfill them.

Let’s go crazy and throw some ideas around. we may not solve anything, but you never know who’s lurking here.

[/quote]

Fuckin A man Fuckin A maby u should run for office

[quote]vroom wrote:
Zeb,

Your tactics are getting suspect and you are starting to sound a bit hateful.

Just letting you know.[/quote]

Give your friend Professor that advice. The only way to react to that guy is with these tactics. Sort of like someone jumping you in a bar. The response has to be equal to the attack.

But thanks anyway vroom.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
ZEB wrote:

You will soon find out exactly how much freedom of speech you have when it comes to the military.

I will soon find out how much freedom of speech I have? What are you referring to here?[/quote]

Duh…you call others ignorant? Reread the last post genius!

[quote]So then you are thinking that it’s okay to tell your commanding officer to “take a hike” as long as you eventually carry out his orders.

Why would I disrepect someone above me by telling them that?[/quote]

Becuase (according to you) you enjoy free speech and feel that you can inject your opinion…Do you now want to retract those comments?

[quote]Professor stated, “Why would I talk to a GI about my deep opinions of Iraq unless THEY brought it up?”

You see, when you write stuff like the above that leads everyone to believe that you would tell them your twisted opinions if THEY brought it up.

Don’t say it if you don’t mean it-or at least try to remember what you type.[/quote]

Are you having some kind of mental breakdown? If I was ever confrtonted outside of work about my stance on an issue, I would definitely tell someone my opinion. [/quote]

Are you having some sort of memory problem (you usually do when someone confronts you with your own bullcrap)?

You never stated “outside of work.” Are you now ammending your original statement? I love how you twist and turn when cornered. I think others have enjoyed it as well along the way. Hey…it’s free entertainment for most of us. :slight_smile:

Well Prof how do you express hatred for an individual on a message board? I think the only way would be to call them vicious hateful names.

And YOU have done that to President Bush. Do you want to deny it again? What’s the big deal you have freedom of speech just own up to it…

[quote]Hold on you better go treat more GI’s peel yourself away from the computer LOL…Oh and don’t forget to give them your opinion of the war and President Bush if THEY bring it up that is.

What exactly is your problem?
[/quote]

Don’t have one-you?

[quote]Professor X wrote:
vroom wrote:
Zeb,

Your tactics are getting suspect and you are starting to sound a bit hateful.

Just letting you know.

I honestly don’t think he can see it. Just like that thread he jumped in because he thought another poster was flaming me. I think the world Zeb sees is different than everyone else’s. He apparently doesn’t see his posts here as “vile” or “hateful”. I am amazed at this. He can point out the flaws of the world but can’t see his own at all.
[/quote]

I jumped in the other post because your response was outrageous! That you missed that is not surprising, most things that are not superficial go right over your head.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I guarantee Zeb sees himself as “righteous”.[/quote]

Please point out even one post where you have admitted being wrong.

End of story.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Professor X wrote:
vroom wrote:
Zeb,

Your tactics are getting suspect and you are starting to sound a bit hateful.

Just letting you know.

I honestly don’t think he can see it. Just like that thread he jumped in because he thought another poster was flaming me. I think the world Zeb sees is different than everyone else’s. He apparently doesn’t see his posts here as “vile” or “hateful”. I am amazed at this. He can point out the flaws of the world but can’t see his own at all.

I jumped in the other post because your response was outrageous! That you missed that is not surprising, most things that are not superficial go right over your head.
[/quote]

That’s funny. Three other people agreed with what I wrote in that thread so apparently you are the only one who considered it “outrageous”. It was a post about measuring your arm flexed or unflexed. In what way was the response “outrageous”?

Looks like time for a tag team match.

Prof X and Vroom vs Zeb and Rainjack