An older technique.
1 Like
RIP Louie!
Especially for money!
Okay, then prove him wrong. Debunk his papers.
Whatās that listening to something outside of the mainstream? I always knew it.
But isnāt that an animal? So why would that count? And of course you didnāt listen to the protocol otherwiseā¦
You prove him right.
No. Something recommended by you, a brainwashed automaton.
1 Like
Wouldnāt be surprised if he believes that Terrance Howard is the best scientist everā¦
Of course you donāt because you or anyone else canāt. Good to be on the wrong side of an issue. How is it, over there?
The papers from the Professor already do that task.
Man, the dudes on here love to project.
You donāt understand them? How do you know if itās not BS? You just believe everything you read? You sound brainwashed. A tool. A sucker.
1 Like
And you donāt even read. You just listen to what the mainstream says and nod your head like a faithful little soldier.
And you like to claim projectionā¦
Iām reading your posts, dummy.
No idea. Maybe none; maybe all. Government canāt āfund,ā though; it can only redistribute.
No. Itās all of economics. Capitalism lets you directly follow the money, while other systems give you(I.e., them) tons of distractions and obstacles.
Thatās a service.
We both know you meant books or something on a higher level than T-nation forum posts, dummy!
And what do you think pays for all those wars? Taxes! Bwahahahahaā¦And before you try and say they sold bonds to pay for it, prove it. Show me the Treasury statements.
And where does it lead to?
And what do they use? The weapons may be manufactured by a defense contractor but the money is provided by the federal government. Without the funds provided the weapons could not be sold or even manufactured. So no, in this example, the products are provided by defense contractors. However, it is the government that acts as a catalyst to start this transaction. Without their funds and the demand for these products the defense contractors would probably fold.
Are you saying your posts arenāt worth reading?