Cancer has been found in fossilized bone tumors, so it existed before humans.
In Egypt in 3000 BC part of an ancient Egyptian textbook on trauma surgery mentions it. It describes eight cases of breast cancer that were removed by cauterization. The writing says about the disease, “There is no treatment.”
Biology is just rolling the dice. When I was studying pre-med one doctor said something like “Everyone develops a cancerous cell a hundred times a day.” Which freaked me out for a bit.
It pretty much is that. The only difference is instead of burning coal to heat water, nuclear fission heats the water.
And again, you guys are thinking short term with the toxicity. Toxicity remains for hundreds of thousands of years. We have no idea what the climate will be in an area 10k years from now, let alone 100k years… And who/what will live there or need to live/work there, or where seismic faults will show up, etc, etc.
Fundamentally, the problem with nuclear waste is the timescales it needs to be protected… So, the best answer is to reduce/eliminate waste and toxicity, which is where the new highly efficient reactor tech comes in.
agreed.
yes, but people think this will inevitably lead to a mushroom cloud explosion.
Quite the opposite. I watched my dad die from cancer, and know how it feels to wish, beyond hope or reason, that somebody lives.
You’re a whiney innefectual wimp.
Do you mean “get government out?”
Who cares? You especially ought to know more about mathematics, aren’t you an engineer?
Does he say cure? He talks about managing and it’'s far less barbaric in it’s side effects if there are any. He and Warburg’s learned view is that cancer starts as a mitochondrial/metabolic disease not a genetic one. Genetic defects may be there but they occur downstream.
He said he’s written or been involved with 150 peer reviewed studies. I’m sure you would love that factoid.
The man who started it all https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1931/warburg/biographical/
No I mean get pharma out.
Every time a politician does something you don’t like, peel back the layers and find out who is behind it. Usually some big corporation or some billionaire’s. The marriage of business and government. Fascism.
Hhhmmmmm…you mean all those treatments didn’t work? Saw my Aunt die of cancer at a very young age. Only 39 or 40. And what those barbarians did to her. But hey, I’m sure it helped some upper level manager or CEO buy a sports car or a bigger yacht. so at least their death wasn’t in vain.
.
You’re a silly, stupid piece of shit.
Every so often, I divulge a bit [f personal information to see what somebody does with it, how they respond.
You just told me as much as I need to know about yourself.
Yeah back in that day, I’m sure there was no treatment. And today we have barbaric treatments designed for profits first. How much is a healthy person worth to our “healthcare” system?
So, just end medical advancement? Hope we retain what’s already achieved?
I know politicians aren’t powerful figures. They’re just faces that function as distractions.
Yes. It’s called economics. That one can follow the money should surprise no one.
Yes. But you don’t want government out of it. And business can’t end(well, I guess it can, but that would be disastrous for most). Business is more than happy to accept government’s cover/assistance, but business also provides goods. Government provides no goods but can function as cover for business. You want what will never be: a government that can force useful production.
quote=“SkyzykS, post:351, topic:286955”]
You’re a silly, stupid piece of shit.
[/quote]
But yet you know because… Go back and watch some more Morning Joe so you can think you know what you are talking about. Or maybe you get your views from The View. Either way, you are a sad little soldier with an undeserved large ego. Go fuck yourself! You are an absolute waste.
What advancement has recently been made w/o government funding?
It;s called Capitalism.
The most obvious is the military. It isn’t politicians or business per se. It’s the system which promotes the grotesque effects.
How much is a dead person?
You said projection like I couldn’t understand what these scientists are saying. If it’s projection that I don’t understand, how the hell would you understand?
Managing a death sentence is still a death sentence. Chemo and radiation can actually cure.
Contrary to the research of many other scientists who have, IMO, better evidence it is genetic.
Fine he is published, so are the MMT proponents you worship. Doesn’t make them right, just that I read their stuff with a little more authority than some bullshit debate on YouTube.
You’re a dumbass hypocrite.
I think there is a lot of potential for diet to mitigate cancer risk, and to even possibly suppress or eliminate cancerous cells from spreading once cells have first turned cancerous. But, once you do have cancer, you’re gonna want western medicine step in, which is admittedly treatment (instead of prevention) focused.
So the real answer is, do both. Diet and lifestyle upfront, but once you have the disease you should aggressively treat it with western methods.
I agree with you. But he is arguing something else.
Ask Merck.
Is he arguing turmeric cures cancer, and chemo is just done for profit.
My BIL’s Florida family is big into that. Sad for their kids who have medical problems and are constantly in and out of hospitals because they won’t accept medicine beyond that which is used to stabilize the kids in the ER.