Stallone at 63

If my estimates are correct then… my penis is 104yrs old when erect!!! :open_mouth: Crap!

Draaaaaaaaaago!

[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
downwardog wrote:
Steve Maxwell
56 years old

no drugs
no photo prep

170 on 5’8"

natties don’t impress me. He does have a 6 pack though and at 56 I can give him props for that.[/quote]

A damn closed minded way of thinking. Not everyone decides to take the step over to the darkside, doesnt mean they aren’t working just as hard.

It bugs the shit out of me when somebody wants to discredit a good physique just because of AAS use, but this pisses me off even more.

I was more annoyed at the fact that they can’t spelling “aging”.

[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
AssClown wrote:

Whoever wrote that article is a douchebag. His veiny (and massive) forearms are a sign of his aging? Gotta love clueless people.

I noticed that too, I had no idea what the author was talking about. Veins = aging? Ok?[/quote]

I dont think he was talking about the amount of veins but they way they look. You just dont see veins like that on a person 25 years old.

He looks amazing and I dont like his tattoos, guess its because Im just not a fan of tattoos.

[quote]1porsche wrote:
Pluto wrote:
Randy couture to

Hoohah def my favorite UFC fighter. Complete badass.[/quote]

he is a badass, gotta credit where its due. i dont think youll see anyone else fighting at his age. granted i think he should give it up now but dude is still a helluva fighter.

He looks good for any age, and him being 63 makes it even more admirable that he does look like that. People can debate the HGH question, but even if he does take it, do you really think he sits on his ass and does nothing? For those who want to frown on HGH or AAS, can you not appreciate the fact that these people have such diligence to training, nutrition, and all around approach to their success? Whether or not they use needles or pills, they bust ass.

[quote]chimera182 wrote:
I was more annoyed at the fact that they can’t spelling “aging”.[/quote]

That’s the way I spelled it in my reply. I actually felt stupid for a second and second guessed myself. Guess I was right.

[quote]AssClown wrote:
chimera182 wrote:
I was more annoyed at the fact that they can’t spelling “aging”.

That’s the way I spelled it in my reply. I actually felt stupid for a second and second guessed myself. Guess I was right.[/quote]

Spelling is an important part of life, especially on the internet where the standards for intelligence are so high.

[quote]He looks great, but at the same time kind of weird.

his skin just looks funky. Like if you touched it he would be soft and spongy. IDK if I’m making any sense? lol [/quote]

Seems to happen to a lot of master’s bodybuilders too. Muscle’s there but the miles are showing. See pic.

I would hit it.

Damn pics never attach right

[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
natties don’t impress me. He does have a 6 pack though and at 56 I can give him props for that.[/quote]

Huh!? Haven’t heard that one before.