I like bigger girls. So I don’t really mind.
[quote]Bill Roberts wrote:
Otep wrote:
Bill Roberts wrote:
I tend to think that the pictures, drawings, etc. have to be fraudulent.
Bodyfat and tissues in general can’t really compress to a smaller volume.
Some of can be squished somewhere else, true. As in the comparisons with other products where they point out how this happens. But the total body volume will be about the same.
The pictures shown don’t have an equal, if any, volume squished out elsewhere to account for the huge disappearing volume in the ass, belly, and thighs.
I strongly suspect there’s a time gap and major weight (fat) loss between the pics.
Some of them are just too extreme to be, to me, believable.
I imagine it’s like a light corset- the … thing… compresses the midsection down into the internal organs, which do have space to squish.
Did you watch the thing?
How do huge amounts of ass fat and thigh fat squish into the volume of squished internal organs?
[/quote]
Magic?
The argument doesn’t hold for the thighs, but does for the midsection. And breasts, somehow.
Unless of course, you don’t believe any part of the body is compressible… which… I’m not sure I’d believe you were being serious.
Take my post as saying exactly what it does.
If you want to believe huge volumes of ass fat and thigh fat are just going to be “slimmed away” by this or any compression product – perhaps someone imagines bone marrow is hollow and that provides room – you go right ahead.
And generally speaking no, except for air-filled areas the body is NOT much compressible. It can be pushed around to different places, but overall, with same amount of air and water in the body, total volume remains pretty constant. That’s a fact whether it fits with your beliefs or not.
On breasts: no there cannot be an actual body volume change either. A product can squish more into a given area, or squish flat and some volume moves sideways, up, and down, but volume is not reduced. Sorry, water and fat are non-compressible.
In this video, the women very clearly have drastically different total volume in the pictures with the product than without. Such loss of volume cannot be attributed to compression but is easily explained by dieting and fraudulent advertising.
What, you didn’t think there was such a thing as fraudulently done before and after pics?