so literally the worst place on the internet.[/quote]
I still don’t really get the double slash part but it’s ok.
I suck at the interwebz[/quote]
It’s 4chan’s “fitness community”, and yes, it is the worst place on the internet. Celtics has a profile there. I made the mistake of trying to look for it. Place makes the Hell dimension in Event Horizon look like a five star holiday resort.
[quote]It’s 4chan’s “fitness community”, and yes, it is the worst place on the internet. Celtics has a profile there. I made the mistake of trying to look for it. Place makes the Hell dimension in Event Horizon look like a five star holiday resort.
No wonder Celtic’s eyes were empty and soulless.[/quote]
[quote]It’s 4chan’s “fitness community”, and yes, it is the worst place on the internet. Celtics has a profile there. I made the mistake of trying to look for it. Place makes the Hell dimension in Event Horizon look like a five star holiday resort.
No wonder Celtic’s eyes were empty and soulless.[/quote]
OP was once considered a god on the nightclub dance circuit. He had it all: money, cars, women all thanks to the moves. Then almost overnight it seems, came the rise of the manlet. His mortal ballroom skills were no match for their almost supernatural booty shaking ability. He had no chance.
You see, manlets took away everything that was good in his life. Now, the manlet is a symbol of his failure. He sees them everywhere he goes. Sometimes, out of the corner of his eye, he might see the vaguest outline of one. He’d pretend not to see, only to whirl around in the hope that he’d catch one in his butterfly net to prove to the world that he isn’t just a crazy drunk spitting bile on street corners…but nobody else ever sees them. At least that’s what they say…
[quote]ByronKelleher wrote:
What exactly is the criteria for a manlet?[/quote]
If you are in fact the real Byron Kelleher, then standing at 1.75m or 5, 7" you probably qualify.
[/quote]
1.75m is 5.9’’ bro[/quote]
Then I’ve failed at entering calculations for a long time…
Good to discover that I’m not 5.75, but probably closer to 5.10.
Some conversion systems seem to be give a different calculation. I wonder if it’s again UK feet/inches vs American ones…
[quote]Edevus wrote:
Good to discover that I’m not 5.75, but probably closer to 5.10.
Some conversion systems seem to be give a different calculation. I wonder if it’s again UK feet/inches vs American ones…
[/quote]
I’m pretty sure feet and inches are the same the world over. I think it might be the way your doing the calculation
1.75m is indeed about 5.75’. But 5.75’ isn’t the same as 5’7.5" because there are 12 inches in a foot, so 0.75 feet is 9 inches. Hope that makes sense.
[quote]Edevus wrote:
Good to discover that I’m not 5.75, but probably closer to 5.10.
Some conversion systems seem to be give a different calculation. I wonder if it’s again UK feet/inches vs American ones…
[/quote]
I’m pretty sure feet and inches are the same the world over. I think it might be the way your doing the calculation
1.75m is indeed about 5.75’. But 5.75’ isn’t the same as 5’7.5" because there are 12 inches in a foot, so 0.75 feet is 9 inches. Hope that makes sense.[/quote]
Yeah, it does, thanks. I didn’t start using feet, inches and pounds until I started with bodybuilding. I think that some conversion programs, including the one in my phone, are using decimal systems with the inches, so they count only until 10, not until 12, making it give wrong reading.
In example, according to my phone, 1,82 is 5.9 and 1,83 is 6 feet.
