not really 19
I just say that on the internet to try to pick up younger chicks.
[quote]Menthol wrote:
I just shook my head at Obama’s latest idea to help the housing market.
“Obama Administration Admits Housing Policy Misstep; Failed to Correctly Predict How Disastrous Their Own Policies Would Be for the Economy”
From Doug Power’s article:
"It sounds like the lesson here is that if you?re working your butt off and you still having trouble making those mortgage payments, you should lose your job ? that way you?ll be able to keep your house (because everything?s ass-backwards in Obamaland):
The Obama administration said Thursday it would require lenders to allow unemployed homeowners to delay their monthly payments for up to a year without threat of foreclosure.
The announcement came a day after the president made a rare admission of a policy misstep, acknowledging that his policies have failed to provide enough support to struggling homeowners and recognize the scope of the nation?s housing crisis.
So true to form, their ?solution? to this problem will do nothing but create more of the problem, and maybe that?s the whole point.
Notice that Obama?s only admission of a mistake isn?t for the Democrats? policies that have crippled the economy, but only for forgetting to bring enough shammies to clean up the ?unexpected? bloody aftermath from the victims of those policies. Truly amazing."
[/quote]
Looking at today’s employment report from the BLS and your link, I predict that Obama might not even run in 2012. Imagine having 4 more years of everyone asking: ‘What do we do NOW, Mr. President?’, and he’s completely clueless. That HAS to be torturous.
I’m not going to pretend to know much about US politics or politics in any country for that matter - i find it tedious and corrupt at best. However given that Mr. G W Bush was given a second term, and i’m hoping no one here would now support the fact that he was. Should Obama not get a second as well?? Who’s the possible opposition? Could they possibly do any better?
[quote]dre1986 wrote:
I’m not going to pretend to know much about US politics or politics in any country for that matter - i find it tedious and corrupt at best. However given that Mr. G W Bush was given a second term, and i’m hoping no one here would now support the fact that he was. Should Obama not get a second as well?? Who’s the possible opposition? Could they possibly do any better? [/quote]
You’re right you don’t know much about US politics.
[quote]dre1986 wrote:
I’m not going to pretend to know much about US politics or politics in any country for that matter - i find it tedious and corrupt at best. However given that Mr. G W Bush was given a second term, and i’m hoping no one here would now support the fact that he was. Should Obama not get a second as well?? Who’s the possible opposition? Could they possibly do any better? [/quote]
Suppose you were given a job teaching quantum physics, and you knew nothing of the subject or how to teach it. Would it be torturous for you to attempt to do your job?
You’d probably make every excuse to go play basketball, golf, take the family on a vacation. You like the $$$ and prestige but it is just plain Hell when you’re working because you are clueless about this subject. That’s Obama.
doesnt anyone remember bush raising the debt ceiling 8 times and lower taxes on the rich then we promptly went into a recession? or are we just going to blame everything on the black guy?
[quote]dre1986 wrote:
I’m not going to pretend to know much about US politics or politics in any country for that matter - i find it tedious and corrupt at best. However given that Mr. G W Bush was given a second term, and i’m hoping no one here would now support the fact that he was. Should Obama not get a second as well?? Who’s the possible opposition? Could they possibly do any better? [/quote]
I agree with you, even though I believe McSame would have doubled down on the wars , he would havwe been screwed also had he been elected.
The only difference would be if McSame were Prez.the Dems would be carping rather than the Reps.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
The only difference would be if McSame were Prez.the Dems would be carping rather than the Reps.
[/quote]
This is the reason politicians disgust me.
[quote]xspoonman wrote:
doesnt anyone remember bush raising the debt ceiling 8 times and lower taxes on the rich then we promptly went into a recession? or are we just going to blame everything on the black guy?[/quote]
No one is truly blaming him. Its just that no Prez can win in an economy like this.
Will Obama quit? No, he’s too damn arrogant for that.
Oh, and fuck the Republicans too. Both the Democrats and the Republicans are out to screw us. They just have different ways of going about it. It’s all about power.
[quote]Lordcliff wrote:
Will Obama quit? No, he’s too damn arrogant for that.
Oh, and fuck the Republicans too. Both the Democrats and the Republicans are out to screw us. [/quote]
Do tell and how exactly are they going about this? Please be specific I do relish in the details when I read such things.
All of my friends who like Obama say that George Bush fucked up the economy. Would somebody like to explain to me how he did that?
Serious question.
Luke
[quote]CSEagles1694 wrote:
All of my friends who like Obama say that George Bush fucked up the economy. Would somebody like to explain to me how he did that?
Serious question.
Luke[/quote]
Watch this video. It’s two years old. To be fair to the Kenyan Commie, keep in mind that as a percentage of GDP national debt is roughly the same as it was at the end of WWII. The difference is your capacity to pay it off. US Industry is not going to surge the way it did after WWII particularly as you are moving much of your industry offshore.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]CSEagles1694 wrote:
All of my friends who like Obama say that George Bush fucked up the economy. Would somebody like to explain to me how he did that?
Serious question.
Luke[/quote]
Watch this video. It’s two years old. To be fair to the Kenyan Commie, keep in mind that as a percentage of GDP national debt is roughly the same as it was at the end of WWII. The difference is your capacity to pay it off. US Industry is not going to surge the way it did after WWII particularly as you are moving much of your industry offshore.
By moving industry offshore you mean sending jobs overseas so that hard-working Americans are left unemployed while somebody in India is taking my tech support call?
Luke
[quote]CSEagles1694 wrote:
By moving industry offshore you mean sending jobs overseas so that hard-working Americans are left unemployed while somebody in India is taking my tech support call?
Luke[/quote]
Exactly.
[quote]xspoonman wrote:
doesnt anyone remember bush raising the debt ceiling 8 times and lower taxes on the rich then we promptly went into a recession? or are we just going to blame everything on the black guy?[/quote]
The black guy ? Oh, you mean Chocolate Jesus. Well let’s see what Chocolate Jesus has done…
Cash for Clunkers, thought it would stimulate the economy by providing a $3500-$4500 credit towards new cars. What REALLY happened ? Dealers raised the sricker prices on cars, but by how much ? You guessed it, $3500-$4500 bucks, nice win brah.
Whored himself out to pass a health care law that is what I would give a 60% efficiency. If I have to pay for something for 10 years, but only get access to it for 6 years, you do not need to be an Einstein to see that is not what I could call a good deal. What else happened though ? How many UNIONS have petitioned for exemptions imposed by the law ? More than you can say “yes we can.”
While the thought of a black president could had signified a change of the times, where issues of color and race were no longer an issue, I am going to argue that he dug the line even deeper in the sand between races. His statements regarding “white cops acting stupidly” and “wise latinas” were completely baseless, since he knew very few (if any) facts in those specific matters. Rather than let people be people, wise or not, stupid or not, he had to get that jab in just to appease his whoremasters.
The Nobel Peace Prize winning president, who won the award with no more than 1 year served in office, yet ordered the shooting of an unarmed man in the face. Nice one brah.
A man who, during his campaign to pass his health care law, encouraged "getting in people’s faces when they used rhetoric to criticize his health care law. Well, yet again, Chocolate Jesus then had to talk about toning down the very same rhetoric when Gabrielle Giffords was shot, along with the Federal judge, and other innocent people.
Sued Arizona for doing what the White House was too chicken shit to do. He would rather pander to the mythical Latino movement, than to protect the citizens and legal residents of Arizona.
I am also going to argue that he and his party condescended the Tea Party, people who have every right to their opinions, tried to paint them as racists, yet gave him a “shellacking” in November of 2010. So much for the movement being astro-turf.
Suggested that known terrorists be given civilian trials, rather than military ones. The guy who murdered thousands of people should not be granted the same rights as me, sorry, but not really.
To all the Obama lovers, there is nothing he can do about this economy. Government creates DEBT, that’s it. The only thing he can do, is get out of the way, and let private enterprise save the country.
Stop looking at whether a guy has an R or a D next to his name, look at the policies.
You can’t pin the recession on a particular president. Overreaching low-to-middle income Americans deserve blame. Wall Street deserves a generous helping of blame. Bush deserves blame. Clinton deserves blame. Reagan, particularly his ideological legacy, deserves blame (I know, I know, I shouldn’t slander the Almighty so openly). Obama deserves blame. Capitalism itself–its very nature–deserves blame. If you argue that any one man or ideology or economic policy can be said to have caused this disaster, you don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about.
[quote]CSEagles1694 wrote:
All of my friends who like Obama say that George Bush fucked up the economy. Would somebody like to explain to me how he did that?
Serious question.
Luke[/quote]
He increased spending, cut taxes ,the equivalent of deciding to work a 3 day work week and buy a new car and a new house
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]CSEagles1694 wrote:
All of my friends who like Obama say that George Bush fucked up the economy. Would somebody like to explain to me how he did that?
Serious question.
Luke[/quote]
Watch this video. It’s two years old. To be fair to the Kenyan Commie, keep in mind that as a percentage of GDP national debt is roughly the same as it was at the end of WWII. The difference is your capacity to pay it off. US Industry is not going to surge the way it did after WWII particularly as you are moving much of your industry offshore.
I do not believe this to be true , Clinton had a surplus as did LBJ both Dems
And Bush set the spending on a war at a time of BOOM