Shocking Facebook Bullying Video

if there is a bad person in the video it would be the person videoing it . I saw no signs of a racist act , I just saw kids bullying another kid . The bullies need to be disciplined .

This is probably the danger in all the race baiting . Now we are seeing children’s spats as “SHOCKING” eye roll :slight_smile:

[quote]Karado wrote:
Mr. Walkaway typed: "it was in one of the comment sections on a site that contained the article… I figured whoever posted that might know something I don’t…hence “apparently”.

OH I SEE, you saw it in the COMMENTS section somewhere on the internet!!
BUT you distanced yourself from it being legit Juuuust enough by adding the disclaiming
word ‘‘apparently’’ to it, yet you found it Juuuuust important enough to relay that HEARSAY
for everyone here to read.

Nice try.[/quote]

u seem to be vague on what “apparently” means…

Video is down, anyone know of one that’s still up?

I found the video and OM MY GAWD THAT WAS SHOCKING. Honestly I don’t see what the big deal was, that was nothing.

Having said that, I’ve got a 3 year old daughter and no kid would ever treat her like that. If they did they would find themselves far too terrified to ever even think of doing it again. Some monster assaulted my youngest son in a McDonalds play structure. When I found out about it I was furious with my wife for not protecting him better and I was on the phone with the police trying to get them to get security video from the McDonalds.

While this is heart-wrenching to watch I don’t necessarily think that it is anything new or racist in nature. The saying “kids are cruel” exists for a reason. If only I’d had a camera shoved in my face when I was being a prick, I would be burned at the stake.

[quote]on edge wrote:
Video is down, anyone know of one that’s still up?

[/quote]

[quote]Quasi-Tech wrote:
So being condenscending is an earned privlege, not a right?

Can we do that with other things, like big screen TV’s, smart phones, and health care? Naw…[/quote]

Can we make this the take away point of the thread, please?

[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:

I think the REAL problem is… you aren’t allowed to spank your children anymore…
[/quote]

So we can add children to the list of people you hate that already includes blacks, women and any man who has kissed a woman.

The kid who was filming and encouraging is the one who needs to get his ass kicked.

As it was said before, behavior like this is learned not genetic.

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Quasi-Tech wrote:
So being condenscending is an earned privlege, not a right?

Can we do that with other things, like big screen TV’s, smart phones, and health care? Naw…[/quote]

Can we make this the take away point of the thread, please?[/quote]

One could only hope.

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:

I think the REAL problem is… you aren’t allowed to spank your children anymore…
[/quote]

So we can add children to the list of people you hate that already includes blacks, women and any man who has kissed a woman. [/quote]

what?

[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:

I think the REAL problem is… you aren’t allowed to spank your children anymore…
[/quote]

So we can add children to the list of people you hate that already includes blacks, women and any man who has kissed a woman. [/quote]

what?[/quote]
Let me explain: we can add children to the list of people you hate that already includes blacks, women and any man who has kissed a woman.

Is that better?

I gotta go with orion. Having “mastered” the “quote function”, I must say that it’s misuse is far more misleading than the use of the word “apparently”. It’s almost worse that top-posting (or bottom-posting, whichever is the opposite of the customs of this forum…)

[quote]Karado defecated:
Orion, I don’t think you can speak English so let me spell this out for you; A ‘‘requirement’’ means it’s a MUST. Having defined things clearly I’m going to leap, intangibly, off the deep end; So unless you are the Supreme Master running the show from Austria,
that COMMAND that you have just rendered has shrunken down to a mere nanoparticle all the way from .

The hills are ALIVE, with the sound of grammar!![/quote]

Karado wrote:
A ‘‘requirement’’ means it’s a MUST…So unless you are the Supreme Master running the show from Austria,
that COMMAND that you have just rendered has shrunken down to a mere nanoparticle all the way from where
they filmed The “Sound Of Music”.

The hills are ALIVE, with the sound of Mustard!!

EDIT: I left out a comma.

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:

I think the REAL problem is… you aren’t allowed to spank your children anymore…
[/quote]

So we can add children to the list of people you hate that already includes blacks, women and any man who has kissed a woman. [/quote]

what?[/quote]
Let me explain: we can add children to the list of people you hate that already includes blacks, women and any man who has kissed a woman.

Is that better? [/quote]

are you 16 years old? or just a supreme idiot?

[quote]Karado wrote:
A ‘‘requirement’’ means it’s a MUST…So unless you are the Supreme Master running the show from Austria,
that COMMAND that you have just rendered has shrunken down to a mere nanoparticle all the way from where
they filmed The “Sound Of Music”.

The hills are ALIVE, with the sound of Mustard!![/quote]

It was more like:

Unless you show the ability to make the quote function your bitch, which is well within the range of an orphaned crack baby, any attempt of being condescending rings somewhat hollow, but, oh well…

We all do what we must…

Pleiades typed: "It was more like:

Unless you show the ability to make the quote function your bitch, which is well withing the range of an orphaned crack baby, any attempt of being condescending rings somewhat hollow, but, oh well…

We all do what we must…"

“Must” mean a REQUIREMENT with no option, what ‘‘must’’ you do?
Please, don’t give me the power to do what YOU ‘‘must’’ do, I don’t need that kind of power.

[quote]Karado wrote:
Pleiades typed: "It was more like:

Unless you show the ability to make the quote function your bitch, which is well withing the range of an orphaned crack baby, any attempt of being condescending rings somewhat hollow, but, oh well…

We all do what we must…"

“Must” mean a REQUIREMENT with no option, what ‘‘must’’ you do?
Please, don’t give me the power to do what YOU ‘‘must’’ do, I don’t need that kind of power.

[/quote]

Well, in this valley of tears, we are often judged by our demonstrated abilities, right or wrong, and, if you cannot master the most basic of forum functions…

It is all dreadfully superficial, but what is a girl gonna do?