[quote]Professor X wrote:
rsg wrote:
Ruggerlife wrote:
Of course, the flip side of that argument is,
If your in love, planning on staying together, remaining monogomous, living together, and raising a family together…why not get married?
Costs, time, planning, sex life goes down (from what I hear)…
Then again, I wonder how much things actually change from how they are before a couple gets married? I bet the controlling behaviour of one party, or the shitty sex life is there even before a couple gets married - marriage just gives them an excuse for it. But hell, it’s just a guess since I’m only 23.
Not sure about UK common law, but in Canada, if you live together for (something like a year) in a relationship you are legally married under common law.
Not sure about UK law myself either since I’m one of those hated Soth African immigrants, but if you are “married under common law”, than again I see no need for marriage other than a title of saying “I’m married”.
I think it is still seen as a status symbol here in America. Women seem to see it as some right of passage where they will experience the happiest day of their fairy tale lives. This is why it is doubtful that any man could win the Presidency without being married. For some reason, our culture seems to relate marriage with stability in one’s life. The truth is, I often see quite the opposite outside of those who have kids and really have their shit together.
With a 52% (or greater) divorce, it doesn’t look like there is too much stability out there.[/quote]
Not to mention that the financial arrangement is great for the woman. If she divorces him, she gets paid for years and takes half the assets that she probably didn’t earn with a paycheck! It cost my father-in-law about 1.5 million with my mother-in-law. She’s already spent all of it and then some inside of 6 years.