San Bernardino Shooting

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

Serious question, what exactly do you report? “My Muslim neighbor is in his garage a lot and recently had a lot of packages arrive”. And what do the police do if they get that call? [/quote]
Good question really? But if they were selling drugs out of the house it would be no problem to report it. Could you report suspicious behavior? Perhaps the neighbor feels guilty he remained silent. Or perhaps he feels he COULD have been a hero & saved the day… Or he’s just a media whore.

[quote]pushharder wrote:
Our Attorney General’s Greatest Fear

“Lynch said that since the Paris attacks, her greatest concern has been the ‘incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric, that fear is my greatest fear.’”

Her greatest fear? Really? Greatest?[/quote]

That’s what the left does. They view the exact same situation as the rest of us and then walk away with the wrong message.

I think her greatest fear should be Islamic terrorism OBVIOUSLY. But…nope.

Just like Obama using this latest Islamic terrorist act to talk about gun control. When in fact he should be encouraging rational populace to arm themselves.

Always right on down the line the exact opposite message. Honestly in all my years I have never seen anything like that guy.

[quote]Gkhan wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

Serious question, what exactly do you report? “My Muslim neighbor is in his garage a lot and recently had a lot of packages arrive”. And what do the police do if they get that call? [/quote]
Good question really? But if they were selling drugs out of the house it would be no problem to report it. Could you report suspicious behavior? Perhaps the neighbor feels guilty he remained silent. Or perhaps he feels he COULD have been a hero & saved the day… Or he’s just a media whore.[/quote]

If it were drugs, what lead you to that conclusion? People stopping by at night exchanging small bags for money? One problem with this weak suspicions is the police might treat it as such. A couple extra drive-bys from patrol cars or a door visit will tip them off and they will just become more cautious.

[quote]Darnell Becker wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Not sure if you saw it or not but the California legislature is planning to add more gun laws
[/quote]

I hadn’t heard about it but let’s hope it’s true, I’m sick of so many gun related deaths in this country.
[/quote]

Yea, that’s going to help…

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
If it were drugs, what lead you to that conclusion? People stopping by at night exchanging small bags for money? One problem with this weak suspicions is the police might treat it as such. A couple extra drive-bys from patrol cars or a door visit will tip them off and they will just become more cautious. [/quote]

Yes, very true, but getting back to my main point: the neighbor said he didn’t want to report them because he didn’t want to racially profile them, not because he didn’t want to tip them off. Do you think this reason would make people think twice before reporting suspicious behavior in the future?

[quote]Darnell Becker wrote:

[quote]2busy wrote:

[quote]Darnell Becker wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Not sure if you saw it or not but the California legislature is planning to add more gun laws
[/quote]

I hadn’t heard about it but let’s hope it’s true, I’m sick of so many gun related deaths in this country.
[/quote]

Yea, that’s going to help…[/quote]

Well it wouldn’t have helped in this case, of course not, but many other deaths could have been avoided if it weren’t for the shameful gun culture in this country.[/quote]

Shameful? Man possesses an inherent right to self defense, even under a Hobbesian social contract. A determined unhinged individual will find a way to murder en masse, be it with firearms, improvised explosive devices, or a ford fusion. Strict gun laws and the French aversion to firearms did not prevent the November 13 Paris massacre. Terrorists and psychopaths, who are determined to murder the innocent, care little for laws that deem a platform illegal or not.

P.S., how much experience do you have with firearms?

[quote]Darnell Becker wrote:

Well it wouldn’t have helped in this case, of course not, but many other deaths could have been avoided if it weren’t for the shameful gun culture in this country.[/quote]

Don’t mix issues. It gives people like Pushharder and other gun-happy conservatives more ammo to make legitimate points.

As of now, this appears to be a terrorist event. Whether it was a premeditated one or a spur of the moment one, whether there’s a genuine terrorist cell in the U.S. or this is a “lone wolf” incident, are all unknown. But this appears to be a terrorist attack nonetheless.

Everyone jumped the fucking gun when they started decrying the gun violence issue in the U.S. My Facebook page was inundated by ton of news articles talking about the gun issue, etc.

The thing is, short of banning guns/confiscating/and literally making it impossible for anyone to obtain guns, you can’t prevent things like this. By all accounts, these people seemed to be perfectly normal people. You cannot prevent normal people from obtaining guns unless you put a blanket ban on guns. That’s why all these “place more restrictions on gun sales!” seems like a false argument to me, at least when it comes to preventing premeditated/terrorist attacks.

In short- you cannot prevent people like Adam Lanza and Tashfeen Malik from getting guns by placing more restrictions on guns. You need to ban them, period.

And this leads me to my broader point- How exactly is gun restriction supposed to work? I read an interesting article on Vox.com that stated that the gun violence issue that everyone seems to ignore is suicide by gun. Indeed, apparently at least 60% of death by gun are suicides. It raises an interesting point in that suicide attempts are mostly spur of the moment things and that suicide attempts with a gun are far more likely to succeed when compared to attempts by overdosing/slitting wrists/ what have you.

So, yes, preventing these people from getting guns seems to be a good option at reducing suicide rates.

The problem is, I very much doubt that these people showcased suicidal tendencies when they bought their gun. So, how do you prevent suicide by gun? Stop them from getting guns in the first place.

What I really want to get at is- I think the whole brouhaha on gun violence is incredibly muddled. I mentioned earlier that my Facebook page got inundated by posts about gun violence. Notably though, people seemed to be talking about people being killed by guns. Just death by gun. That seemed to be the common point.

One Christian lady posted a video of SF policemen gunning down some man (who reportedly had a knife and stabbed someone earlier) in plain daylight in front of people filming the thing. She wasn’t upset about the fact that people had guns, since I don’t think any reasonable individual would argue that the police shouldn’t have guns in the U.S. She was just upset that someone got killed by a gun.

People seem to be mixing a ton of different issues (gun violence by police/mass murders via either insane individuals or terrorists/gun violence by criminals/gun-related suicides/etc) and zero in on the only real commonality- that the violence occurred by gun.

And in doing so, they either ignore finer points about all those issues that might actually help in reducing said issues, or they chase after phantom issues that may not even exist to begin with.

I don’t think this helps at all in getting to, and working to solve, any of those issues. And it gives Pushharder and his ilk more reason to say Obama is dumb.

Please, Obama, stop giving people like Pushharder more reason to say you’re dumb.

more gun experts on cnn

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
more gun experts on cnn[/quote]

LOL

[quote]Darnell Becker wrote:

[quote]2busy wrote:

[quote]Darnell Becker wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Not sure if you saw it or not but the California legislature is planning to add more gun laws
[/quote]

I hadn’t heard about it but let’s hope it’s true, I’m sick of so many gun related deaths in this country.
[/quote]

Yea, that’s going to help…[/quote]

Well it wouldn’t have helped in this case, of course not, but many other deaths could have been avoided if it weren’t for the shameful gun culture in this country.[/quote]

The wife passed a background check for a K-1 fiance Visa, and the guns were purchased legally, and California requires extended background checks. Maybe the vetting process for the wife should have been more thorough.

What do you mean by shameful gun culture ? Triggers do not pull by themselves.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]HeyWaj10 wrote:
WashPo just reported that the attacker had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State leader on Facebook, so there ya have it.[/quote]

It will still be labeled workplace violence because it happened at work. [/quote]

At least it will according to obama and his ilk, Isis is play this fool of a President and the Americans that follow him like a fiddle.

[quote]Darnell Becker wrote:

[quote]2busy wrote:

[quote]Darnell Becker wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Not sure if you saw it or not but the California legislature is planning to add more gun laws
[/quote]

I hadn’t heard about it but let’s hope it’s true, I’m sick of so many gun related deaths in this country.
[/quote]

Yea, that’s going to help…[/quote]

Well it wouldn’t have helped in this case, of course not, but many other deaths could have been avoided if it weren’t for the shameful gun culture in this country.[/quote]
Name one.

[quote]Darnell Becker wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]Darnell Becker wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Not sure if you saw it or not but the California legislature is planning to add more gun laws
[/quote]

I hadn’t heard about it but let’s hope it’s true, I’m sick of so many gun related deaths in this country.
[/quote]

LOL, another low information voter. The woods are thick with 'em. Maybe we should do an intervention with you by stuffing you into the Breitbart shower until you come out all scrubbed and clean and smelling good.[/quote]

Haha that’s hilarious, a foxnews link dropper accusing people of being low information voters.

It’s like some mythological cornucopia of ignorance with this fellow.
[/quote]

Serious question. What do you, or anyone who wants stricter gun control laws, think would be an ideal gun control policy?

What about the ten or so California gun laws that this couple were breaking or broke prior to the terrorist attack? Paris France attacks? The perpetrators were breaking the gun control laws of that land?

I honestly don’t understand how a person comes to the conclusion that more laws will prevent a person that is planning on breaking the most severe law, from doing it?

We have terrorist cells in this country right now. They are obviously planning attacks. They are illegally amassing stockpiles of illegal bombs and weapons. I would like to see all of the good, honest people that are in favor of tougher gun control laws to shut up and go by some guns. We just might need you on our side at some point down the line.

[quote]Darnell Becker wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Not sure if you saw it or not but the California legislature is planning to add more gun laws
[/quote]

I hadn’t heard about it but let’s hope it’s true, I’m sick of so many gun related deaths in this country.
[/quote]

Is it comforting to you when people are murdered in ways not related to guns?

[quote]mbdix wrote:

[quote]Darnell Becker wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]Darnell Becker wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Not sure if you saw it or not but the California legislature is planning to add more gun laws
[/quote]

I hadn’t heard about it but let’s hope it’s true, I’m sick of so many gun related deaths in this country.
[/quote]

LOL, another low information voter. The woods are thick with 'em. Maybe we should do an intervention with you by stuffing you into the Breitbart shower until you come out all scrubbed and clean and smelling good.[/quote]

Haha that’s hilarious, a foxnews link dropper accusing people of being low information voters.

It’s like some mythological cornucopia of ignorance with this fellow.
[/quote]

Serious question. What do you, or anyone who wants stricter gun control laws, think would be an ideal gun control policy?

What about the ten or so California gun laws that this couple were breaking or broke prior to the terrorist attack? Paris France attacks? The perpetrators were breaking the gun control laws of that land?

I honestly don’t understand how a person comes to the conclusion that more laws will prevent a person that is planning on breaking the most severe law, from doing it?

We have terrorist cells in this country right now. They are obviously planning attacks. They are illegally amassing stockpiles of illegal bombs and weapons. I would like to see all of the good, honest people that are in favor of tougher gun control laws to shut up and go by some guns. We just might need you on our side at some point down the line.[/quote]

He wants laws based on emotion, not based on rationale, logic, or fact. He also doesn’t understand that when those wanting to do some stupid shit with guns know there are plenty of armed people around him, he is at least forced to think it through knowing bullets will be flying back at him.

[quote]Darnell Becker wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]Darnell Becker wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Not sure if you saw it or not but the California legislature is planning to add more gun laws
[/quote]

I hadn’t heard about it but let’s hope it’s true, I’m sick of so many gun related deaths in this country.
[/quote]

LOL, another low information voter. The woods are thick with 'em. Maybe we should do an intervention with you by stuffing you into the Breitbart shower until you come out all scrubbed and clean and smelling good.[/quote]

Haha that’s hilarious, a foxnews link dropper accusing people of being low information voters.

It’s like some mythological cornucopia of ignorance with this fellow.
[/quote]

Baristas who wear skinny jeans are not welcome here.

Please check out the “Powerful Women” sub forum.

That will be all.