It was Russia no need to pander to denyers at this point. Even the Walmart crowd gets it now.
Which is reason number one to move from a two party system
Do you really want this to escalate?
Don’t worry we elected a guy that said we needed congressional approval to do anything in Syria and that military action would only lead to more debt and a long term conflict. So we don’t have to worry about him bombing an airstrip or getting involved.
@EyeDentist and anyone else singing the praises of Mueller
Trump may not have done anything. But how do you feel confident in a guy who is clearly one of the most untrustworthy people in office? Judging him strictly off the nonsense he had been for, then against, then for, then whatever?
He’s completely full of shit even by the average politician standards
Haha 
his orange face may soon match his suit… Hey looks like Flynn is snitching to FBI to save ass the Kush lawering up too. Russia signaling Trump today to release sanctions or pee tape comes out. That’s what the fly overs mean. BTW nobody dropped coin on a high dollar criminal attorney unless they have a reason to protect the brown eye. I never met a guy in court that gives lawyers money for fun… Just saying:roll_eyes: btw how cool was it he talked today.
On the day Russia drops the pee tape, I fully expect you to come into PWI and drop the mic in EVERY. SINGLE. THREAD.
1 Like
This, if true, is the stuff that keeps happening over and over in this administration. Couple things like this with the fact that the administration, and more importantly Trump himself, have shown no interest in, or even curiosity about, how Russia interfered in the election and what we’re doing to stop it from happening again…
1 Like
Why in god’s name would Trump ever want it to stop?
1 Like
starting of another war over more fake Intel escalated by the lying media? Sounds familiar
I’ll never understand how people think the media is somehow more powerful than owning all 3 branches of govt
1 Like
It’s pretty easy when…
1 Like
The Republicans profited tremendously from being the “opposition party” the last few years. Clearly they didn’t have any good ideas for what to do about healthcare, but all they had to do was bang the drum about repealing Obamacare and they had a winning line for the base. Now, faced with actually being responsible for government, they have two choices: either actually have a policy plan and implement it, or blame the media for giving an unfair slant on XYZ to distract the populace so they don’t realize that you have no better idea.
2 Likes
You mean the purported all-powerful media that went in the tank 120% for Hillary Clinton and then…didn’t get Hillary Clinton elected? But now lords over the nation, leaving the three branches of the federal government impotent and cowing before its awesome might at driving everything, including the “narrative”?
2 Likes
Don’t worry we elected a guy that said we needed congressional approval to do anything in Syria and that military action would only lead to more debt and a long term conflict. So we don’t have to worry about him bombing an airstrip or getting involved.
This post works so often. You have nothing to fear Raj Trump wouldn’t lie. He’s not a typical politician. He will drain the swamp.
Are you tired of winning yet?!?
1 Like
SO MUCH WINNING
It’s weird how no politicians have any interest in this.
Gee I wonder why
Surely they are not concerned we have a President who is going to put America first. How many times do I have to post that for you?
1 Like
Actually, I have to agree with this, because there is a veritable clusterfuck brewing in Syia right now.
After the ISIS attack in Tehran, the Iranians are even more pissed and they’ve started lobbing medium-range ballistic missiles onto ISIS live streamed on national TV. Even the ayatollah is doing his best “kill 'em all” routine in the media.
So bizarrely, their behavior is exactly in line with what the alt-righters fantasized about Trump doing once he takes office.
Now, it’s a zero sum game with the shia/sunni war. If the Sunnites are losing (in this case ISIS), it means that the Shiites (Iran) are winning. So as any geopolitical advantage to Iran is anathema to the current Saudi-oriented US policy, the US is trying to limit Iranian gains on the ground, which includes shooting down Iranian drones approaching US trained (allegedly) anti-ISIS Sunnite forces.
So in order that the political/military vacuum after ISIS is not filled by Iran, the US is trying (once again) to haphazardly cobble together an anti-ISIS Sunnite faction called the SDF.
The colossal failure with “moderate rebels” in Syria should have thought the policy makers that you simply cannot fund or will into existence an artificial faction into a 1300 year old religious war.
And it seems that the POTUS has casually outsourced all this to the Pentagon.
1 Like