If the CIA is able to freely manipulate the intel they have how are we to know it hasn’t been manipulated prior to being leaked?
Definitively saying WikiLeaks is uncensored when they clearly pick sides says a lot imo
1 Like
Let me make sure I have this right.
Are some of you suggesting that WikiLeaks is “uncensored” …when the vast majority of the information released is overwhelmingly 1) Western/U.S. and 2) in the case of the last election, overwhelmingly information on the Democrats?
Please explain.
I know it’s thin, but try to stay with me. You may need your tinfoil hat for this one.
I’m all ears, pfury.
The “theory” that the left wing socialist crackpots are pushing as FakeNews via their laptop CNN is that WikiLeaks seems to be favoring one political side, AND that it coincides with Russias interests. It’s about as crazy as thinking Trump’s advisors would one day register as foreign agents because they accepted money from a Russian backed govt.
Stupid dems…
Got it…(I think…)
The Manafort stuff
That was all public information right? Nothing was leaked and everyone knew his past before he joined the Trump presidential campaign?
Nope, it was either “accidentally” lied about or intentionally. Not that it really matters at this point. Worst case Trump will just pardon him for the perjury or whatever else he needs and blame the Dems for a witch hunt.
Officials familiar with the process say even if the application to monitor Page included information from the dossier, it would only be after the FBI had corroborated the information through its own investigation. The officials would not say what or how much was corroborated.
1 Like
This dovetails with the Steele Dossier quite nicely.
1 Like
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-russia-election-exclusive-idUSKBN17L2N3
A second institute document, drafted in October and distributed in the same way, warned that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was likely to win the election. For that reason, it argued, it was better for Russia to end its pro-Trump propaganda and instead intensify its messaging about voter fraud to undermine the U.S. electoral system’s legitimacy and damage Clinton’s reputation in an effort to undermine her presidency, the seven officials said.
That’s right when Trump started talking about voter fraud.
2 Likes
Actually, it’s pretty easy to follow Russian propaganda - just listen to Kiselyov. In Soviet times you had to read the Pravda editorial and catch subtle allusions, now it’s much simpler.
The flamboyant yet anti-gay Kiselyov often parrots back Trump tweets disguised as opinions, naturally in a more verbose form. From the “Democrat sore losers” and “dishonest media” to “Obama intelligence failures”
But amazingly, Kiselyov isn’t the worst - you have to go to other government channels for Alex Jones-style ramblings about the “deep state”, “false flag attacks” and how “Jews are trying to fire Bannon because he’s thwarting their plans”
1 Like
Some odd goings on today with this and Chaffetz. Will wait to see if more mainstream media pick this up.
“All of a sudden, we see a lot of people, especially Trump supporters, who consider that, ‘OK, now Brexit is done, now Trump is done, we are moving on to France.’ You can see how central the French election is to their view of the world,” he said.
It seems a number of online accounts that supported Trump have suddenly taken an interest in overseas elections. Hmm…
1 Like
The motives behind the Brexit vote, Trump’s election and now Marine’s race for election are similar.
I feel if she wins the EU will die and Brexit is just the start of it.
Exactly.
Just keeping the thread alive…
oh by all means Tyler, I think this thread definitely deserves to stay alive
1 Like