Looks like you have to become a member…no way in Hell…
So…if anybody wants to give some intelligent discussion on what Rush “really” wanted to say, I will be the FIRST to apologize…
Mufasa
Looks like you have to become a member…no way in Hell…
So…if anybody wants to give some intelligent discussion on what Rush “really” wanted to say, I will be the FIRST to apologize…
Mufasa
One last thing…
I wouldn’t subscribe to an “Al Sharpton” site either…
I don’t like Racism and/or Race Baiting from ANYONE…
Mufasa
I wanted to highlight something that brings me endless amusement: dems who voted for bill clinton having the audacity to criticize ANYONE’S personal life.
Remember all their blather about: It’s his personal life. It’s all about the blowjob. blah blah blah.
Take a peek at the known dems on this thread that use drug/body habitus as their go to move.
You clowns are HYPOCRITES!!!
JeffR
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Brainiac and beautiful…what more could you want?
I DO have a thing for highly intelligent women, though, so I may be biased (Mrs HH is a university prof).
[/quote]
Yummmmm Adam’s Apples…

[quote]JeffR wrote:
I wanted to highlight something that brings me endless amusement: dems who voted for bill clinton having the audacity to criticize ANYONE’S personal life.[/quote]
Voting for him and defending him are two completely different things. Just because I support someone politically doesn’t mean I have to support terrible decisions he makes in his personal life.
Further, the people being blasted for poor personal choices are those who railed on Clinton for his own personal choices. They are people who preach, from a pulpit or a radio show, about moral quality and how Democrats lack it, then turn around and engage in the very behavior they have been lambasting others for.
Hypocracy can always be mocked, regardless of who is doing it, and who is doing the mocking.
Hypocrisy, demogogery,deciet and lies are not confined to only one side of the Isle…
Mufasa
[quote]Marmadogg wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Brainiac and beautiful…what more could you want?
I DO have a thing for highly intelligent women, though, so I may be biased (Mrs HH is a university prof).
Yummmmm Adam’s Apples…[/quote]
Hmmm…since you spoke in plurals, you are either very stupid or you’re insulting my wife, in some asinine way. In either case, that was a smooth move, Mr. Exlax.
There was a photo recently of an NFL player, I think a Baltimore Raven, flashing a gang hand signal. Cornerback Darrent Williams of the Denver Broncos was shot and killed early New Year’s morning outside a Denver nightclub. Ravens linebacker Ray Lewis was involved – directly or indirectly, depending on how you look at it – in a murder prior to the Super Bowl in 2000.
In that incident he was in the company of several known gang members. They were interviewed and said it themselves. Chicago Bears defensive tackle Tank Johnson was arrested earlier this year for drug and weapons charges. In the past year, 9 Cincinnati Bengals players have been arrested for various offenses.
Earlier this year Chargers linebacker Steve Foley was shot after an early morning confrontation with an off-duty police officer. Snoop Doggy Dogg, known L.A. area gang member, often roams the sidelines of Raiders home games. Michael Vick was just caught with marijuana residue in his water bottle or squirt bottle pocket at Miami Int’l Airport.
Several Minnesota Vikings players rented two party boats on a night in 2005 and committed various “acts” on the boats prompting an investigation causing four of the players to be charged with crimes. And several years ago a player named Rae Carruth hired a thug to shoot and attempt to kill his pregnant wife or girlfriend.
This is coming from a huge NFL fan, which I am. If one openly and honestly looks at the NFL, it is definitely not a squeaky clean league. In fact, it’s a damn disgrace. But I still love pro football.
[quote]BabyBuster wrote:
JeffR wrote:
I wanted to highlight something that brings me endless amusement: dems who voted for bill clinton having the audacity to criticize ANYONE’S personal life.
Voting for him and defending him are two completely different things. Just because I support someone politically doesn’t mean I have to support terrible decisions he makes in his personal life.
Further, the people being blasted for poor personal choices are those who railed on Clinton for his own personal choices. They are people who preach, from a pulpit or a radio show, about moral quality and how Democrats lack it, then turn around and engage in the very behavior they have been lambasting others for.
Hypocracy can always be mocked, regardless of who is doing it, and who is doing the mocking.
[/quote]
Hey, welcome to the forum!!!
Interesting post.
First of all, change your name. I’m not sure what “babybuster” means, but, it sounds pathological.
Second, the democrats have lost the ability to criticize anyone’s personal behavior. By consistently and vociferously supporting an obvious crook and liar, billy boy, they are morally bankrupt. If you are interested in seeing an example of PURE, UNALLOYED HYPOCRISY, read bradley’s condemnation of Giuliani’s personal life. You won’t EVER find bradley saying the same things about clinton.
Third, remember that delving into clinton’s affair with lewinski was a direct offshoot of Paula Jones’ sexual harrasment suit. It’s a fairly common prosecutorial practice to establish a pattern when establishing a case against a sexual predator.
I don’t know you. Only you know if you uttered the infamous phrase, “it’s only his personal life.” However, if you did. If you made comments like, “Starr is only doing this because clinton’s a democrat” then, you were in favor of denying Paula Jones (and others) their say in court.
You cannot walk that fine line with clinton. Either you are ok with using the power of the Presidency to blunt a woman’s (imagine if it was your mother/sister/daughter) right to be free from sexual harrassment or you aren’t.
If you are, then this could be taken to it’s logical conclusion. For example, imagine if jeffrey dahmer was running for Senate. Imagine he was a smooth and persuasive speaker that spoke to your interests. Now imagine you learned about his horrific crimes. Are you going to seriously sit here and tell me that “Voting for him and defending him are two completely different things. Just because I support someone politically doesn’t mean I have to support terrible decisions he makes in his personal life.”
Now imagine that Paula Jones was your mother.
JeffR
[quote]Mufasa wrote:
Hypocrisy, demogogery,deciet and lies are not confined to only one side of the Isle…
Mufasa[/quote]
Agreed. However, the democrats who would DARE rip on Giuliani dressing in drag or his marital troubles, are expressing PURE hypocrisy.
JeffR
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
How many of you you gents have ever even listened to his show? Then, he says you have to listen for at least 6 weeks to ‘get’ what the hell he’s saying.
I’ve listened to him since 1989. He is arrogant but good at ripping the shit out of the Libs.
One of my colleagues was ripping me for listening to him. I then asked him specifics about why he hated Limbaugh. “I never listen to him!” He said others had told him all about Rush. Laughable but sad.
[/quote]
Listened for a few years. Agreed with him about 90% of the time. Now that relationship is inverse.
The “I never listen to him” comment applies to those who berate Chompsky.
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
The “I never listen to him” comment applies to those who berate Chompsky.
[/quote]
If you are such a fan of Noam, why must you insist on spelling his name wrong every time you post something about him?
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Brainiac and beautiful…what more could you want?
I DO have a thing for highly intelligent women, though, so I may be biased (Mrs HH is a university prof).
[/quote]
Wow, John Kerry in a blonde wig and leather dress.
Trannyliscious!
[quote]Mufasa wrote:
“…Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it…”
WHAT THE FUC*IN’ HELL IS THIS???
I don’t see a lot of NFL games where guys beat the Holy Hell out of each other while the refs stand around. And their punishment? They get put on their little itty bitty glass enclosed potty!
Don’t see too many Brothers on the Ice, my friend. And the 1 or 2 that were got sucker punched, not only probably ending their careers, but almost killing them.
You are on a SLIPPERY slope when you, Rush or ANYBODY confines bad behavior to a race.
Grow the fuc*k up…you and Rush…
Mufasa
[/quote]
Best.Post.
[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Zeppelin795 wrote:
The “I never listen to him” comment applies to those who berate Chompsky.
If you are such a fan of Noam, why must you insist on spelling his name wrong every time you post something about him?
[/quote]
Thanks for the spelling bee.
I like Rush, I don’t always aggree with him, but I like him. One thing I have learn about him his you cannot take his shit out of context because he often says things that on their own look crass but in context, make sense.
To answer the questions, no I don’t suck his dick, no I do not consider myself a “conservative”, and I do not listen to him all the time.I also don’t give a fuck if he does drugs and takes viagra.
I do consider him a tremendously talented orater. I believe he has been deamonized and stereotyped by the media at large because that is who he targets and exposes most of the time.
I do not know what he was talking about when he said that, but I feel the NFL needs to clean out the criminal element in it. It is just to much, from Ray Lewis to, what was it, 9 Bengals arrested this year? That’s just fucking ridiculous.
That may not have been his reference. I don’t know.
I know this, even if Rush was a racist. I pretty damn sure he is smart enough not to say it publicly.
[quote]pat36 wrote:
I like Rush, I don’t always aggree with him, but I like him. One thing I have learn about him his you cannot take his shit out of context because he often says things that on their own look crass but in context, make sense.
[/quote]
This is absolutely true