[quote]pushharder wrote:
I also believe in the power of love.[/quote]
It’s a curious thing. It makes one man weep, and another man sing.
[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
[quote]JEATON wrote:
Sooo…
You don’t deny the quadrilateral nature of your mom’s vajayjay?[/quote]
If I was more crass, I’d reply:
“I can’t really give you an opinion on my mom’s - however, I am much far better equipped to have a lengthy discussion about your mom’s “vajayjay”, since I have so much more experience with it.”
But I’m generally not that crass. Run along, the adults are talking.
[/quote]
ThunderLips,
I believe I had a bit of an epiphany today. Had to do quite a bit of traveling by car and found myself listening to the Glen Beck show. I think I now know your muse. It was almost as though you had stole, word for word, Beck’s schtick on RP. Even down to the cute little “Paulbots”.
Got me to thinking…
Maybe we can start calling you a “Beckbot”. Your obvious idolatrous fascination would seem to qualify you.
But seriously, now I can’t even think of you as original in your sanctimonious idiocy. I have to wonder, do you subscribe to Beck’s newsletter? Charter member at Glen Beck TV?
Anywho…
Not too worried 'bout you having intimate knowledge of any female’s anatomy, much less a close family member of mine. Your “anal” nature would suggest you being much more inclined toward male orifices.
Do have to admit though, I now find you more entertaining, if not interesting.
[quote]JEATON wrote:
ThunderLips,
I believe I had a bit of an epiphany today. Had to do quite a bit of traveling by car and found myself listening to the Glen Beck show. I think I now know your muse. It was almost as though you had stole, word for word, Beck’s schtick on RP. Even down to the cute little “Paulbots”.
Got me to thinking…
Maybe we can start calling you a “Beckbot”. Your obvious idolatrous fascination would seem to qualify you.
But seriously, now I can’t even think of you as original in your sanctimonious idiocy. I have to wonder, do you subscribe to Beck’s newsletter? Charter member at Glen Beck TV?
Anywho…
Not too worried 'bout you having intimate knowledge of any female’s anatomy, much less a close family member of mine. Your “anal” nature would suggest you being much more inclined toward male orifices.
Do have to admit though, I now find you more entertaining, if not interesting. [/quote]
Never watched a Glenn Beck show, never read an article written by him, and have no intention of doing so. Besides, I think he’s a Randian - and Randians are bozos.
Give it a rest. Your trash talking is worse than your debating. Move along.
[quote]Mufasa wrote:
It’s worth repeating:
Paul’s follower’s are very loyal to him (and visa-versa).
If his supporter’s want him to run as a Third Party Candidate, I think he will.
First things first…tonight (the Iowa Caucuses) should be very interesting!
Mufasa[/quote]
If he does run as an independent he may steal just as many democrat votes as he would republican. Keep in mind who makes up the Ron Paul base, mostly (yes mostly not everyone) young males. And who traditionally votes democrat? Young people…
Ron Paul’s foreign policy is dangerous, unrealistic, and is probably based upon unspoken conspiracy theories (it wasn’t Al Qaeda). Then again, standard Republican foreign policy is dangerous, unrealistic, liberal, and increasingly off-putting to the general population.
[quote]Sloth wrote:
Ron Paul’s foreign policy is dangerous, unrealistic, and is probably based upon unspoken conspiracy theories (it wasn’t Al Qaeda). Then again, standard Republican foreign policy is dangerous, unrealistic, liberal, and increasingly off-putting to the general population. [/quote]
How is bringing the military home to defend the homeland dangerous?
It’s really people like you who are dangerous because you actually believe the US government to be capable of keeping the world “stable”.
The more you believe that the worse you hurt people here at home. I hope you sleep well at night.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I would almost positivly vote for him as an independent. I would have huge reservations if he runs as a republican[/quote]
May I ask why that is?
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]Bonesaw93 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I would almost positivly vote for him as an independent. I would have huge reservations if he runs as a republican[/quote]
May I ask why that is?[/quote]
That’s like asking a cow why she farts.[/quote]
Haha, I was just curious how the same person with a different letter attached to their name is different. It’s like saying I’ll vote for Arlen Specter now that he’s a democrat when I wouldn’t before because he’s a republican. I never understood how someone can make a decision like that. If you like Ron Paul vote for him. If you don’t, then don’t vote for him. Don’t let his political affiliation sway you one way or the other. Just trying to point out how some people vote with a candidates policy as an afterthought.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Mufasa wrote:
It’s worth repeating:
Paul’s follower’s are very loyal to him (and visa-versa).
If his supporter’s want him to run as a Third Party Candidate, I think he will.
First things first…tonight (the Iowa Caucuses) should be very interesting!
Mufasa[/quote]
If he does run as an independent he may steal just as many democrat votes as he would republican. Keep in mind who makes up the Ron Paul base, mostly (yes mostly not everyone) young males. And who traditionally votes democrat? Young people…[/quote]
I would disagree that his following is mostly young . I would say they are libertarians
[quote]Bonesaw93 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I would almost positivly vote for him as an independent. I would have huge reservations if he runs as a republican[/quote]
May I ask why that is?[/quote]
I feel if he were the Republican nominee he would be too beholding to the Republican party
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]Bonesaw93 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I would almost positivly vote for him as an independent. I would have huge reservations if he runs as a republican[/quote]
May I ask why that is?[/quote]
That’s like asking a cow why she farts.[/quote]
Well at least it is not like asking Pussy how it is that wealth can not flow in the direction of the wealthy ?
Mufasa-
Dr. Ron Paul has been making the same claims and the same stance since I have followed him. That means more to me than anything. Other people call Paul a libertarian in a way they think he should be ashamed. Well, when looking at the word and the definitions it has, I would take that as a compliment. - http://www.theihs.org/what-libertarian - Ron wants to end the wars, cut spending a TRILLION dollars his first year in office, end the war on drugs and a number of other points which I agree with him on. How is this a bad thing? The patriot act, SOPA and NDAA addressed here - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phRi80HBIuU - Many of the same topics are here in T-Nation. Awesome in my opinion ; )
Judge Napolitano does a far better job than I, plus he made me think on many topics. The video is just short of the five minute mark. - http://www.foxbusiness.com/on-air/freedom-watch/index.html
Here is an ad I enjoyed ; ) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQDowv4wD8U
Edit - Sorry, the links had embedded videos and they aren’t needed.
Ron Paul Fox News Sunday Interview 01/08/12
[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:
Ron Paul Fox News Sunday Interview 01/08/12
I think his only fault in the interview is being an optimist
[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:
BIg Government Conservative 
LOL, Chicken Hawk Love it ,Poor little Newt
Problem is they are not conservatives, Man I wish everyone would watch this .Thanks KD&(
