[quote]mstott25 wrote:
Right, you just said he wants out of Iraq - so much for intellectual honesty which prompted my question - What intellectual honesty are you talking about? To which you have rambled on and on about 3rd graders, ignorance, waffle house, and reading comprehension but you still can’t answer a fucking question. “Read more posts…ask a big brother…get a job at waffle house…” Meanwhile there’s a fucking retard wearing a diaper and hearing protection next to every single one of your posts. [/quote]
I told you to scroll back a few pages and pick up on the discussion that prompted my post. It is not my fault you don’t do it, nor is it my responsibility to get you up to speed. You are the one that refused to educate yourself.
And just a short FYI - get your parents to rent Super Troopers for you, and pay close attention to the shooting range scene.
[quote]Just because you’re a little bitch in real life and everybody treads on you doesn’t mean we’re all bullying you here too. I just asked you a question, you are the one with PMS who is so blinded by your napoleon syndrome that you can’t tell me why you would say “So much for intellectual honesty” with respect to Paul’s stance on the war. Take a deep breath, call your mom and tell her you’re upset because of how she mistreated you, and come up with something more substantial then your one sentence assertions and menopausal ramblings.
[/quote]
I never said anything with respect to Paul’s stance on the war. A little background reading would enlighten you.
Why type paragraphs when a sentence does the job? When you get out of elementary school you don’t get graded on how many words you use.
I never said I could find a 3rd grader. I said that you could probably find one - just ask a class mate if you could talk to their big brother/sister.
Oh, I get it!!! Funny!!! You should post more often. You should also ask one of your co-workers if “classmate” is always seperated into two words or just by fucking retards! Tell me again how smart you are…
[/quote]
I figured you would have trouble with that many letters put together at the same time, given your demonstrated inability to actually read. So I broke them up. Consider it my little gift to you.
[quote]mstott25 wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
mstott25 wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
mstott25 wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
rainjack wrote:
I watched the debates tonight - and it became blatantly obvious why all the cradle-to-grave socialists have such a hard-on for Paul.
He wants out of Iraq.
So much for intellectual honesty.
It is a joke. Paul would dismantle so many things they support yet because he wants out of Iraq he is their hero?
What are the so many things we support? The Federal Reserve? The Department of Education?
The EPA, HUD, affirmitive action, Roe v Wade, gun control…
I don’t “support” any of those things. Why would I support affirmitive [sic] action? Why would I support gun control or the EPA or HUD??? I’m a married middle class white male with two children and a fucking government job - what makes you think I’m liberal or I benefit from any of the above mentioned government programs? Close them all, quit wasting money.
You work for the fucking government? Ron Paul would fire your useless ass in a heartbeat!
Oh really?!? I missed the part where the US Army was getting shut down. Oh well!
[/quote]
Since he wants the military within our borders and not all over the world he would probably get rid of 75% or more.
He is more of a citizen and his rifle kind of guy.
I never said I could find a 3rd grader. I said that you could probably find one - just ask a class mate if you could talk to their big brother/sister.
Oh, I get it!!! Funny!!! You should post more often. You should also ask one of your co-workers if “classmate” is always seperated into two words or just by fucking retards! Tell me again how smart you are…
I figured you would have trouble with that many letters put together at the same time, given your demonstrated inability to actually read. So I broke them up. Consider it my little gift to you. [/quote]
Thanks! Your gifts are as useful as your commentary on politics! Maybe you should start rewarding yourself and finally finish getting that AA - quit thinking so much about others you thoughtful guy, you!
When you got no rational arguments, what do you do? You appeal to emotions. This is nothing new and Bush have been using that line for years now. “Axis-of-evil”, “cut-and-run”, and a multitude of other irrational expressions have been carefully selected to appeal to the masses.[/quote]
Irony watch: Lixy just complained that someone lacked rational arguments.
Unless Rocky’s got a box full of phones lying around, your argument makes no sense. Plus, if it was possible to vote multiple times and with the dedication of the Ron Paul base, you might see him get 90%+ of the votes.
This is a pretty good commentary about the Fox News debate:
The more I read how vehement people think Chris Wallace is the more genius like I think he actually is. Chris Wallace used subversive tactics to get Ron Paul to give an answer he knew he would give. The more I think about it the more I realize he was purposely playing into Paul’s hands and he knew what the reaction would be.
How could Wallace not have known what Paul’s answer would have been to “taking marching orders from al Qaeda?”
He knew and he wanted Paul to shine so he took a hit to his journalistic integrity to allow Paul the limelight. Brilliant!
[quote]Mick28 wrote:
But, I’m giving your candidate all the respect that any candidate deserves who has not cracked 3% in any legitimate national poll.
[/quote]
You need to revisit the definition of the word “legitimate”. You pepper your commentary with this word in the most odd places.
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
This is a pretty good commentary about the Fox News debate:
The more I read how vehement people think Chris Wallace is the more genius like I think he actually is. Chris Wallace used subversive tactics to get Ron Paul to give an answer he knew he would give. The more I think about it the more I realize he was purposely playing into Paul’s hands and he knew what the reaction would be.
How could Wallace not have known what Paul’s answer would have been to “taking marching orders from al Qaeda?”
He knew and he wanted Paul to shine so he took a hit to his journalistic integrity to allow Paul the limelight. Brilliant![/quote]
Paul wants to give AQ exactly what it wants. He wants to withdraw from the world. It is a complete joke. I cannot believe anyone supports this clown.
[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Paul wants to give AQ exactly what it wants. He wants to withdraw from the world. It is a complete joke. I cannot believe anyone supports this clown.[/quote]
Do you not understand that it is United States foreign policy of interventionism that is causing the rest of the WORLD to ISOLATE itself from us? Do you also not understand that the United States of America is capable arming and defending itself without the need for a foreign policy of “perceived aggression”?
Exchanging goods and ideas with people is more “globally” sound than trying to always be the “good-guy”.
