[quote]UtahLama wrote:
It’s a matter of cost-per-unit effort…when you have limited resources, you should put them towards your most pressing problem…meth, cocaine, heroin, prescription drug abuse, bath salts ect.
Some pot users might be a bit of a durrrp…but they are almost totally non violent.
[/quote]
Lamb Chop I missed you:)
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
It’s a matter of cost-per-unit effort…when you have limited resources, you should put them towards your most pressing problem…meth, cocaine, heroin, prescription drug abuse, bath salts ect.
Some pot users might be a bit of a durrrp…but they are almost totally non violent.
[/quote]
Lamb Chop I missed you:)[/quote]
Don’t really understand that nickname, I will put it in the same category as your spelling, sentence structure and all around random logic.
[quote]phaethon wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
My own brother got a medical marijuana card for BACK PAIN. Not cancer, fucking back pain.
[/quote]
And back pain isn’t a big deal? Fuck you buddy.
Every once and a while my back will give out and I spend the day lying on the floor in agony. I’ve lost bowel control before because of back issues and have had to lie in my own piss and shit for hours because I was in too much pain to get to the phone.
Maybe your brother is a lying sack of shit and exaggerated his back pain to his doctor. Or maybe he actually has serious back problems. But back pain is not something to be treated lighly.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
As far as liquor stores, how many kids get fake ID’s and get liquor pretty easily ? Well, you just now added pot to that mix. You and I both know that happens, and will happen even more.
[/quote]
Why will it happen more?
If you believe it is hard for kids to buy weed then you are completely out of touch. The only way you can keep your teenager away from pot is if they don’t want to use it. The end.[/quote]
The point about my brother’s back pain is, he doesn’t have it. He just made it up, and presto, he got a medical marijuana card. There are “pot-friendly” doctors who will hook you up for very minimal issues.
No shit it’s easy to buy weed, now you have made it even easier. When I was in high school, it was easy as pie to get liquor, because liquor stores were everywhere. It was supposed to regulated, but it wasn’t to any effective degree.
Rather than having to go to your local dope man, now you go to Sunset Organic Center, on the famous Sunset Blvd, they even have free parking…
[quote]Mufasa wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Pitt,
I live here because I grew up here, and I am not leaving until someone brings the exit-bag. I like to think I am a part of a small group who keep Cali from going off a cliff, as we are $648 BILLION in debt, when you add up all the unfunded pension liabilities, and social entitlement programs that we love to hand out.
Within 12 months, the City and County of Los Angeles will be declaring bankruptcy, as the City boats a $258 Million deficit and a $27 Billion unfunded pension debt (keep in mind this is a CITY, not the state). [/quote]
It will be interesting to see how the next President and Congress responds to this crisis.
Mufasa[/quote]
California will be asking for a bailout within 2 years, maybe less, we are now about $650 BILLION in debt.
The next time people say, “what California does, the nation follows”…don’t jump off the bridge with us.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
The next time people say, “what California does, the nation follows”…don’t jump off the bridge with us. [/quote]
i was thinking more like line the fault with enough C4 to let you guys float off and be your own clusterfuck of a state.
You guys make Ma look like pretend liberals, and that shit is hard to do dude.
LOL…
Where were all the Republicans to endorse Mitt, Where was Bush ? was there even a past president there ? Was there a Presidential contender even there ?
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Where was Bush ? was there even a past president there ? Was there a Presidential contender even there ?[/quote]
The RNC was full of up and coming members of the party.
Rather than give lip service to “forward” and then bring in, Clinton, Carter & Kennedy to fight for them, they are actually just, you know, moving forward.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Where were all the Republicans to endorse Mitt, Where was Bush ? was there even a past president there ? Was there a Presidential contender even there ?[/quote]
Hey Pittski did you like the video of Clinton mocking your boy Obama?
Politics is a strange animal isn’t it?
Someday you might just figure that out.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Where was Bush ? was there even a past president there ? Was there a Presidential contender even there ?[/quote]
The RNC was full of up and coming members of the party.
Rather than give lip service to “forward” and then bring in, Clinton, Carter & Kennedy to fight for them, they are actually just, you know, moving forward.
[/quote]
They also don’t have the equivalent of a Bill Clinton to work with. If Reagan were alive, willing, and in good health, you can bet that he’d have been the focus.
[quote]smh23 wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Where was Bush ? was there even a past president there ? Was there a Presidential contender even there ?[/quote]
The RNC was full of up and coming members of the party.
Rather than give lip service to “forward” and then bring in, Clinton, Carter & Kennedy to fight for them, they are actually just, you know, moving forward.
[/quote]
They also don’t have the equivalent of a Bill Clinton to work with. If Reagan were alive, willing, and in good health, you can bet that he’d have been the focus.[/quote]
Sure, maybe… Who knows.
Doesn’t change the fact they higlighted the youth and future of the party.
Pitt,
Do you mean a former president who DE-REGULATED BANKS ?
A former president who bombed Kosovo, Sudan, Libya, and Iraq ?
A former president who enjoyed a surplus from fake over-inflated internet stocks ?
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Pitt,
Do you mean a former president who DE-REGULATED BANKS ?
A former president who bombed Kosovo, Sudan, Libya, and Iraq ?
A former president who enjoyed a surplus from fake over-inflated internet stocks ?[/quote]
Beans posted the Documentary for an Inside Job. You need to watch it . It will explain things yes Clinton had his fingers in on it So did Reagan . It gives names tells you about the bills . You should watch it it will broaden your mind
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Where was Bush ? was there even a past president there ? Was there a Presidential contender even there ?[/quote]
The RNC was full of up and coming members of the party.
Rather than give lip service to “forward” and then bring in, Clinton, Carter & Kennedy to fight for them, they are actually just, you know, moving forward.
[/quote]
No one spoke for Romney from the old school . Are you telling me the Republicans are becoming progressive 
So now we are going to blame Reagan ?
Is that what you got from my post ?
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Is that what you got from my post ?[/quote]
Why wouldn’t he? Your idiotic stance on Ronald Reagan is well known. At least it’s nice to see you’re consistent. You don’t know any more about political history than you do current events.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Is that what you got from my post ?[/quote]
Why wouldn’t he? Your idiotic stance on Ronald Reagan is well known. At least it’s nice to see you’re consistent. You don’t know any more about political history than you do current events.[/quote]
Ronald Reagan sucks Donkey dick as do you