The 1920’s actually was when it started to take off.
I tend to agree, albeit within an abridged context to the first and second portions of your conveyed ideology.
Women (and men) tend to be drawn towards physical aesthetics, money and power. The redistribution curve following the sexual revolution caters towards men of notable social status as more are going to “want to take a gander” at the proverbial goods associated with fame, power, fortune and beauty.
Whether materialistic possessions and perceived wealth ought to dictate social status is another topic all together that I don’t believe we have talked about in depth.
As to the redistribution, it isn’t as if the average Joe can’t find a mate (casually or otherwise). Talk to the youth demographic in Australia, it’s pretty damn rare to find a nineteen year old virgin. The average number of sexual partners an individual will interact with during their lifetime is probably higher now than it was pre-sexual revolution.
As a 33 year old man, I wouldn’t want to be with a 19 year old woman. Just far to much drama for me, and I doubt we would have anything in common.
I was being hyperbolic; however there are plenty of men who desire women significantly younger. It apparently works in some cases.
Additionally some men don’t care about common interests and hobbies or relating to a woman.
1 Like
Probably true. I think common interests are pretty important. I couldn’t handle being with someone who wasn’t into fitness for example.
1 Like
Not the case in USA now.
You’re damn right. The agenda was anything but hidden! Wikipedia actually has a decent summary.
The statistical average age for a male in the USA to lose his virginity is 16.9
The average male doesn’t marry his first lover, henceforth the average current era male will still statistically interact with more sexual partners vs pre sexual revolution.
The concept within the movie “the 40 year old virgin” probably isn’t going to become the new male norm
ROFL. Stepped away for a bit so I’m only just now seeing this. Sounds cool to me!
1 Like
Have you watched this? I just watched it again and this time I thought it was magnificent. Even better than the first time I watched it.
It’s a movie by Scorsese on the Christian faith. This is the kind of film with the kind of subject matter that only Scorsese can pull off. The man is so skilled at filmmaking, it’s absurd. The existence of Scorsese is proof that there is a God lol. What other evidence do people need?
It should have swept the Oscars when it came out because it sure as hell is better than any of the contenders that year and it’s even a little better than The Irishman but it probably got shunned because it’s about Christianity.
Read this today and Just thought I would post this here.
Is Europe waking up?
I’ve heard France has made some moves to combat the Islamisation of their country as well.
Thoughts and opinions?
1 Like
Don’t be weak Sloth. Say what you wanna say!
It’s been an ongoing issue even in Muslim countries in S.E Asia for decades. I’m not clear on what’s really going on, nor do I know much about Islam. The reasons stated were normally pertaining to national security and, yes, separatism.
^This involves the Hijab, which is just the head scarves.
Maybe its related to The Great Reset? Haha.
No, seriously, there are radicals within Muslim countries that the governments have been cracking down on for decades.
Oh for sure.
Much the same that the Saudi Crown keeps the Wahabi movement at bay I would imagine.
I dunno man, lol. After all the shit we had to do over here post-911, I’ve tried not to go too deep into this stuff.
EDIT:
As far as I’m concerned, my only opinion is let the respective intelligence agencies in these countries watch over potential threats and let the people of the Muslim faith sort this shit out amongst themselves.
I’m not supportive of the bans
1 Like
@mnben87 I am not generally interested in apologetics other than for myself, but these might be of interest to you regarding ‘faith’.
1 Like