@ Shocking. Agree.
To the thread.
Some TG advocates wish to see less gatekeeping from physicians or therapists. Meaning, affirmation without question of anyone who expresses any gender identity. The idea being that identity is all fixed, and essential so the suggestion of therapy is offensive, bigoted, harmful. That’s pretty scary, IMO. Emphasis on the word some, because there is not a unified opinion on it, but we’re seeing this more coming from the gender studies people in the universities, and in some powerful advocacy groups. Everyone who disagrees with this is attacked as transphobic, etc…
On a positive note, more lesbian therapists and old-school feminists seem to be taking issue with the idea that because a young adolescent female likes plaid shirts and wood shop, that she’s somehow a male, or part male. Why make these definitions of gender identity dependent on culturally constructed stereotypes? Women can wear plaid, and like wood shop, or be attracted to other women and still be women. They’re seeing a lot of young girls who in a few years might come out as lesbian, getting caught up in these new definitions of TG, which can involve irreversible medical interventions.
More physicians are prescribing hormone blockers to delay puberty. Understandable, at trying to giving kids and families more time, even though that has it’s own risks.
Fortunately, we’re beginning to see more TG adults, and lesbian and gay people, as well as therapists and physicians voicing concern about what I would describe as a very vocal, and very powerful, far-left ideological wing of the TG advocacy movement. Also, with at least a few people willing to talk about some of the incoherent arguments these advocates are espousing.
@ Gatekeeping. This is what I mean by that.
For anyone who wants to go down the rabbit hole at understanding the ideology that is driving some of this.
She talks about legislation in the first 20 minutes. You may want to skip ahead. This is less about ROGD, and more to the topic of how the ideology. It’s evolved substantially since I first started thinking about this topic.
Also, there’s a very nice Q and A to this with her taking questions. Some of this really resonates with me. I’ve been told many times that I have a less emotional, more analytical personality like she mentions, “You think like a man.” That becomes very offensive right? As if women can’t be analytical. It’s hard to believe that this concept is coming from some of the gender identity advocates, attempting to sell the idea that people like me are non-binary/ queer/ gender fluid, or even trans based on some cultural stereotype.