Bohdi,
I’m in Socal…I just got here…tell me more about these spots as I’m new.
Patricia,
you’re definitely fuckable. But I’m afraid you would have to settle for a quickie because too much cardio eats up the muscles : ) hmmmm HIIF???
Patrisha,
Your r reelee hot. I wood definitlee hav sex with you. U look like u r twentee. Dont let any1 talk bad about ur age. Oldir wimen r sexee.
Call me at 555-ThisThreadShouldDieMultipleDeaths. I kno its long but call!!!
To JOshawa: Sorry it’s taken me a while to get back here, but don’t think I’ve forgotten about it.
You wrote: Evolutionary speaking it is advantageous for men to screw as many women as possible since women do not advertise when they’re ovulating. And the relevance of this is? Men don’t advertise when they’re feeling particularly motile either…so what’s your point?
You wrote: As such men do not know if the woman they screw is going to have their offspring or not; therefore to increase their fitness it would make sense for them to screw as many women as possible in hopes of these women producing their offspring. Dude, WOMEN don’t know if they’re preganant for a while after they get knocked up either. (In fact, if it’s their first pregnancy and you’re assuming a natural, primitive environment, they may not know what’s happening to them right up to the point where they give birth.) So does this mean that they can be “sluts” up until they know that they’re pregnant? Or that after they know they all of a sudden don’t want sex anymore? After all, there’s no evolutionary payoff to having sex if your’e already pregnant, right? Yet, women still want some.
So according to what you wrote above, women should be out fucking every guy who crosses their line of sight (and since things are the way they are, that basically means that a woman could probably get herself laid half a dozen times a night, if not more), then, once she knows that she’s pregnant, she should have no sex at all until after the baby’s been delivered and she’s ready to have the next one.
That’s what I thought was stupid.
I’m with irondoc 100%. I’ve only got 1 body, so I better take care of it. I’ve never understood how someone can just hand themselves over to another person so easily.
What school do you go to? Outlaw needs some ass!
Now that I am married my wife controls my moral standard. If it weren’t for her I’d still be out slutting it up. College is made for sex. Anyone see Road Trip when the one guy asks the other: “Someday we’re going to have to pay for girls like these!” So have some fun!!
To Char-dawg:
Q: I wrote: Evolutionary speaking it is advantageous for men to screw as many women as possible since women do not advertise when they’re ovulating. And u said: And the relevance of this is? Men don’t advertise when they’re feeling particularly motile either…so what’s your point?
A: My point is that men wouldn?t know if the woman is going to have their offspring or not, and thus increase their own fitness, whereas women do know when they?re ovulating so they can pretty much can tell if they are going to become pregnant and thus increase their fitness.
Q: So does this mean that they can be “sluts” up until they know that they’re pregnant? Or that after they know they all of a sudden don’t want sex anymore? After all, there’s no evolutionary payoff to having sex if your’e already pregnant, right? Yet, women still want some.
A: I already said humans have sex for pleasure too; I was merely providing an explanation as to why men have an excuse to sleep with many women, while women do not have that same excuse - something I already mentioned anyway. I?m pretty sure that a woman would have more of an idea as to whether or not she is going to become pregnant than a man would know. Don?t you?
Oh Joeleemanabadin’dawg, yo’ flatter me.
Yo guys kan be soooo cute. Sooo indeerin. I’ll give yo a rin at thet number…an we wil talke.
hugs a kysses, Th Old, But Still Sexee, Woomin whos trieeng to phind a Byologickal reezon to Sleepe Around.
I always wear a rubber when i jack off because I don’t know where my hand has been.
Humans are (maybe) the only animals where the females are never in heat They’re ready to breed anytime, just like the guys are.
Actually, char-dawg, it would be advantageous (in JOshawa’s world) for women to not screw around after they’ve had sex with a guy (which translates to all the time, if you think about it), as just screwing one guy at a time would definitely determine paternity, so the woman would know who to go to for child support. Just thought I’d throw that in, for asswipe purposes.
While JOshawa’s belief that this is a hard and fast justification for male sluttiness and a condemnation for female sluttiness is laughable, I could still easily see where this MIGHT influence our behavior today, but when you consider one’s social and familial upbringing, along with all of the other influences we must undergo as poor, defenseless children, this could be at most only part of the picture.
He also used the abbreviation “u” in his response, which destroys any credibility his argument might have had to that point. Sorry.
Joul, bak offf thadt womin, shee belongz to ko. Pluz, shee kan kik ur azz.
Jared NFS: In case you didn’t notice, I’m the one who got the gif image with the 1 1/2" round nipples all kindsa callin’ my name, not chu.
Rek-og-nize, foo’.
Jared NFS: O u sed ko, not u. Me stupid. I love ko two. Wee r like best frendz.
But that gif was nice. Made me incrediblee glad I decidead to partisipate in dis tread.
Jerome: You have a girlfriend and are getting laid. What makes your behavior any more “moral” than anyone else’s? As someone here said, “morals” are so subjective that there is no point in arguing them unless you have some basis for commonality. For instance, the Bible. We live in a Judeo-Christian society and as a whole, our “morals” are defined by those religious values. Under said values, you and your girlie are as much sluts as anyone else who has ever engaged in premarital sex. So why bother asking the question?
JOshawa: : [quote]“I was merely explaining why it is okay for guys to be polygamous, and not be labeled sluts - it’s in their genes to act that way, while it isn’t for women. This may sound a bit chauvinistic, but at least this Darwinism view has been scientifically proven, and until someone provides some substantial, and real, scientific evidence that contradicts it, then I will continue to believe it.”[/quote]
Um, ok. Who has done this scientific research and decided that there is some gene in men that allows them to engage in the same behavior as women, who according to your scientific research lack this gene, and not receive the same label? Funny, I don’t recall there being a “label” gene, one designed to grant credibility to an action but being either dominant or recessive dependent upon it’s being found in conjunction with an X chromosome or a Y chromosome. Is there a “label” gene that allows it not to be murder when a court sanctioned execution takes place as opposed to some random mugging gone bad? Same action, but different people doing it under different social circumstances. I’d love to see the research on this.
You know, you might have had some credibility using this Darwinism theory stuff but then you went and pulled the sport fuck card.
You state [quote] “…I already said humans [/quote](emphasis mine)[quote] have sex for pleasure too; I was merely providing an explanation as to why men have an excuse to sleep with many women, while women do not have that same excuse.” [/quote]
Men fuck fat/ugly/old women for the sport/pleasure of it. Well duh! Do women not receive pleasure from sex? If they do, then why is sport fucking not permitted them? Men AND women of all ages and degrees of perceived beauty get satisfaction out of sex. But this goes directly against your Darwinism theory. If procreation with, and survival of, the fittest is your basis for this argument, there would be no reason for sport fucking. Men would not choose to procreate with the “reproductively undesireable” as the offspring would be less genetically viable than if they impregated a prime specimen and would thus cause a burden on the group/herd/society. Women would not choose to have sex unless they were currently ovulating and had chosen a most genetically viable sperm donor. But then again, after one potentially viable sperm donor failed to impregnate her, it would only make sense that she seek a new source for the next ovulation. So each month that a woman is not pregnant, she should be “auditioning” potential sperm donors. Hell, that’s an even better excuse to sleep around since the dude that failed to knock her up has proven himself ineffectual. A man spreading his seed is just as much an “excuse” as a woman seeking multiple genetically viable sperm donors.
But we all know this just ain’t how it happens in real life.
QUESTION: Why use the ‘Darwin’ tangent AT ALL when talking about a race (yes, us humans) who has systematically organized society to prevent any possible regression to the hunter/gatherer setting? Darwinism made sense for that period, when you got laid once in your life, if you were lucky, after you probably had to fight or do a hell of an attempt to impress the females (or probably force them, who knows? maybe that’s why rape still exists…an ancient forceful gene propagation-scheme ???). Survival of the fittest sure has changed defition over the centuries, and I would not be too far off to affirm that the industrialisation and advances of society is reversing the ‘survival of the fittest’ population scheme. Nowadays, almost anybody can survive, and nobody needs to fight or compete as much as then to get laid. Getting laid and producing children is not the ‘life or death’ it was before (ok, thousands of years back, it was an imperative, but the genetic code has not followed up to fit to societies ‘mutation’, so we are stuck with ancient DNA mechanisms not adapted to new societal conditions)…it is now an option and, with more and more people by square feet, having the opportunity to get laid got changed from a ‘luck’ to an option…thus the ‘sport’ option. Try pulling that ‘sport’ theory in pre-civilisation/agricultural societies. Won’t work. The 2 don’t mix. That’s my 2 cents.
Maybe this will kill the thread. In sociology one at PSU I learned that 40% of males raised on farms have had sex with animals.
Maybe they were easy slutty hoelike farm animals and the guys were drunk.
But then again what were the other 60% doing, their sisters?
Patricia,
ON second thoguht i saw your little cartoon girl and on further inspection in seems she has two cold-sores on the left side of her mouth on both top and bottom lips so I have to renig on my previous offer…
JOshawa: If you think that women really understand when they are fertile or not, then I guess it’s not really necessary for them to go see doctors about fertility cycle timing (but they do), and I guess that all the stats about teenagers getting pregnant while trying to be safe using the rhythm method are wrong (but they’ve been pretty well proven).
Bottom line: Unless they’ve had specialized education in the area, no, women don’t have a clue about when they are or are not fertile. And most of them know less about it than this particular man, anyway.
Nah, I’m with Joel. I think the best thing about this thread is the GIF that Patricia put up. Gots enny moor lik that layn aroun’, Pat? 
Hmmmm…to many persistant people to reply too, so I’m done trying to explain myself and persuade others. On another note though, that was an interesting bit irondoc said about the farm animals. Beleive it or not I actually had the displeasure of walking in on a guy fucking a dog before. It was quite disturbing actually. Anyone else out there ever heard of or seen such acts of bestality?
To karma:
So if I decide to sleep with one girl at a time I’m a slut? Are you trying to tell me that’s the same as one night stands and casual fucking with friends? I may not ever get married, that doesn’t mean I’m going to be celebit (spelling???) my whole life. But I’m only with 1 girl and I don’t and never have engaged in causal sex or one night stands.
Slept with 4 or more people? Bet you got and std, seeing how it’s estimated that 25% of americans have gential herpes. Bet you got an std karma, not that you’d emmit anyway.