That should sufficiently scare the shit out of you…
Question, why is Obama so obsessed with talk radio, I mean really what is to fear?
I personally have an issue with trying to shut up the opposition, I mean if Bush tried to shut up the media, what do you think would have happened…Well he couldn’t have been less popular, but you get the point.I think this is going to end up backfiring big time on his administration. He is going to make Rush more popular than ever…
This rings of the Soviet push to squash religion as if it were a threat does it not?
P.S. If you don’t like fox news, please find alternative sources that dispel the facts of the stories.
[quote]Magarhe wrote:
When Bush was in power, there was complete freedom of speech, and only the facts were reported in the media, and The Truth
[/quote]
I don’t think you quite understand the point. The point is not accuracy in reporting. How did the Bush admin censor or take on particular comentators? I must have missed it.
[quote]dhickey wrote:
Magarhe wrote:
When Bush was in power, there was complete freedom of speech, and only the facts were reported in the media, and The Truth
I don’t think you quite understand the point. The point is not accuracy in reporting. How did the Bush admin censor or take on particular comentators? I must have missed it.[/quote]
[quote]Magarhe wrote:
When Bush was in power, there was complete freedom of speech, and only the facts were reported in the media, and The Truth
[/quote]
Whether the media told the truth or lied was on the media. Bush did not try to gag his critics. Actually, no president save for this one has tried to silence their critics. Limbaugh went full force on Clinton and Clinton didn’t do a thing.
Freedom of speech is about saying things others don’t like and they just have to get over it. Obama doesn’t seem to respect that based on recent actions.
[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
dhickey wrote:
Magarhe wrote:
When Bush was in power, there was complete freedom of speech, and only the facts were reported in the media, and The Truth
I don’t think you quite understand the point. The point is not accuracy in reporting. How did the Bush admin censor or take on particular comentators? I must have missed it.
[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
dhickey wrote:
Magarhe wrote:
When Bush was in power, there was complete freedom of speech, and only the facts were reported in the media, and The Truth
I don’t think you quite understand the point. The point is not accuracy in reporting. How did the Bush admin censor or take on particular comentators? I must have missed it.
You’re with us or you’re against us.
[/quote]
Yeah that was a quote directed at terrorists, try again. You hsouldn’t comment when you bring not one speck of relevance to a conversation.
The question basically was, what would have happened if Bush tried to take away first amendment rights? I thought the libs were all for the people and there right to do whatever whenever. Hell I can suck a 24 week old baby out of it’s mother, but I can’t publicly disagree with Barrack Hussein Osama. Am I the only one who sees a problem with this line of thinking?