Thinking about hitting up the phil heath classic as my first contest coming round in march about 13 weeks away; probably not gonna try the novice bracket at my age/experience and just waltz into the open.
Definitely need to budget my gear though, finishing off a test/deca/dbol cycle (wasnt impressed, first go with dbol or deca) while having been slowly dieting down for the past few weeks.
Atm dropping down to a low dose test and moderate hcg to give my receptors a breather until I come back with sust/tren/mast+clen/t3 if I decide I can afford to do this.
Ive done the test/mast/tren before at a dose of 650/250/250 and it was my favorite to date; never done the clen or t3 and will probably run the clen 6-8 weeks and the t3 3-4 and moderate doses, maybe along side low dose ephedrine although I feel that overlaps a bit and may prove unnecessary.
My question is, would it be better to run sust/tren/mast at x/250/250 for 8 weeks vs x/400/400 for 4 weeks? I respond bad to prolactin from 19nor so I always opt to low dose tren and probably wont bother with deca again however the higher dose of the business drugs at the end may provide me with a bit of oomph rather than the moderate dose. Or perhaps run the tren the full 8 weeks and stick the masteron at the end?
Any suggestions?