[quote]pushharder wrote:
Tren Winchester Bolone the Mighty?[/quote]
I like it. Go with this one
[quote]pushharder wrote:
SteelyD wrote:
Poochharder.
You really got me to LOL with this one.
[/quote]
x2
[quote]msd0060 wrote:
Bujo wrote:
waylanderxx wrote:
Why wouldn’t your landlord let you get a pit?
Usually its because insurance agencies have created aggressive/dangerous breed lists for dogs. Any tenets with such a dog may cause the policy to be void or raise the premiums. Of course, the communist news media gives all these dogs a bad rap, while completely forgetting that police/military k-9s all fall under the status of aggressive/dangerous breeds.
Rotts and pit bulls account for 67% of all dog bite related fatalities among humans. Say what you want, but actuaries run the insurance biz and the occasional good owner/loud mouth in favor of pit bulls means exactly 1 metric shitton of dog shit to the world of statistics.
Injury Center | CDC [/quote]
On average 18 people out of approximately 308,000,000 people in the US, die each year of dog attack, 11 of those are by Rottys or Pits. That is what I call an inconsequential statistic. What kind of dumb-ass do you have to be to die at the jaws of mans best friend when the other 307,999,982 manage not to?
[quote]Grneyes wrote:
Bujo wrote:
waylanderxx wrote:
Why wouldn’t your landlord let you get a pit?
Usually its because insurance agencies have created aggressive/dangerous breed lists for dogs. Any tenets with such a dog may cause the policy to be void or raise the premiums. Of course, the communist news media gives all these dogs a bad rap, while completely forgetting that police/military k-9s all fall under the status of aggressive/dangerous breeds.
Nowadays, any dog that attacks or bites someone is put down…[/quote]
That’s a load of crap.
-
Military and Police dogs are trained to attack and are not put down after an arrest.
-
Nobody files police reports about being attacked by a Yorkshire Terrier no matter how vicious the little rodent is.
My original comment was meant to point out how insurance companies are over-reacting to sensationalist news media and effecting the way businesses are run. Additionally, neighborhood associations and city councils are adopting similar policies basically telling you what kind of dog you are allowed to own and how many you can have.
[quote]Bujo wrote:
msd0060 wrote:
Bujo wrote:
waylanderxx wrote:
Why wouldn’t your landlord let you get a pit?
Usually its because insurance agencies have created aggressive/dangerous breed lists for dogs. Any tenets with such a dog may cause the policy to be void or raise the premiums. Of course, the communist news media gives all these dogs a bad rap, while completely forgetting that police/military k-9s all fall under the status of aggressive/dangerous breeds.
Rotts and pit bulls account for 67% of all dog bite related fatalities among humans. Say what you want, but actuaries run the insurance biz and the occasional good owner/loud mouth in favor of pit bulls means exactly 1 metric shitton of dog shit to the world of statistics.
On average 18 people out of approximately 308,000,000 people in the US, die each year of dog attack, 11 of those are by Rottys or Pits. That is what I call an inconsequential statistic. What kind of dumb-ass do you have to be to die at the jaws of mans best friend when the other 307,999,982 manage not to?[/quote]
THATS NOT COOL.MY COUSIN WAS KILLED DUMD ASS.YOU NEED TO WATCH WHAT YOU SAY MAN,OR YOU WILL BE NEXT.
I have a cana corso who just turned one and already is 88 pounds.
[quote]pw34 wrote:
I have a cana corso who just turned one and already is 88 pounds.[/quote]
Those dogs are beautiful
[quote]pw34 wrote:
DUMD ASS.[/quote]
The irony is thick.
One vote for Tren
x2 for tren
[quote]Bujo wrote:
Grneyes wrote:
Bujo wrote:
waylanderxx wrote:
Why wouldn’t your landlord let you get a pit?
Usually its because insurance agencies have created aggressive/dangerous breed lists for dogs. Any tenets with such a dog may cause the policy to be void or raise the premiums. Of course, the communist news media gives all these dogs a bad rap, while completely forgetting that police/military k-9s all fall under the status of aggressive/dangerous breeds.
Nowadays, any dog that attacks or bites someone is put down…
That’s a load of crap.
- Military and Police dogs are trained to attack and are not put down after an arrest.
[/quote]
Uhh…yeah, I know. I wasn’t talking about working dogs.
Shit, they even put down a Lab who bit a kid. It seems like the little dogs are exempt. But what I was trying to say was that certain dog breeds that are “aggressive” or “hyperactive” get a bad reputation and are not given a second chance.
I’d go with ‘precious’…it just fits, ya’know? (poochharder…i laughed out loud. that’s just funny shit)
Romeo.
or chewie. as in chewbacca
edit* sry dude, didn’t read thor or tren.
+1 for tren
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Narrowed it down to Thor or Tren. Stuck there so have been calling him Conehead for now.[/quote]
Ahhh…poor little guy. I loved his floppy ears!
+1 for conehead.
If it’s between Thor and Tren, my vote goes for Tren.
Also, chalk up a vote for “tren” from Cortes. lol
I like Thor.
I vote Thor.
You can see he has a good frame (forearms). I had a red nose pit for 4 years that got hit by a car. I got his ears cropped. He seemed pissed about for some time and would fight like crazy to not enter the vet’s office when we went to get the stitches and badges removed.
I love pit bulls. They can be great dogs.
Does he still have his nuts? Probably haven’t dropped yet.
T-Dog