Oops, here is the post you were referring to. No? To appease your rants, here you go -
[quote]ColumboSteel wrote:
Ignored your points? I have addressed every point you have made and not in a tip toe around the subject matter as you do, and if not then post a point you claim I have missed and ill address it. When you ask the same question over and over when it has already been answered over and over then yes you are a broken record, or some dumbass troll who is just trying to get a rise out of people.[/quote] Yet you never once provide any rebuttal, but to few of my counterpoints. Instead of choosing each line you want to challenge, try the whole post.
[quote]GENETICS DETERMINING BEHAIVIOR?!? Nice straw man there. We were talking about the rights of a woman vs. the rights of a potential child [/quote] So when do children gain rights? After a trip down the birth canal? Nope not there. What about the children born via caesarian? No trip down a canal there! Then you have someone who murders a pregnant woman, guess what they are charged with? TWO homicides. Why would that happen if children are not alive in the womb? Huh?
[quote]and somehow you pull that out of left field and claim that it somehow was part of the argument. Seriously, sarcasm or not, WTF??[/quote] Where? From you trying to debate with adults? Grow up and realize there is a time and place.
[quote]And logic? You have not made a single logical argument yet. You are arguing from emotion. Big difference. I guess, by your “logic”, the rights of a small clump of cells which MAY develope into a child are more important than the rights of a breathing, mature person because…well just because. Very Logical.[/quote] Wrong there buddy ol’ pal sarcasm here because I can back my claims with universally accepted science? NO you can [i]NOT[/i], well I can and do. Your arguments are nothing but for a choice, like vanilla vs chocolate ice cream. That is a choice. Life is a choice ALL life deserves!
[quote]Finally if you failed to detect the sarcasm of the killing a child remark, then work on your comprehension abilities. At least my sarcasm is relevant to the actual argument we were having.[/quote] See above junior.
[quote]Its so easy for people to infringe on the rights of another when the situation in question could never happen to them isnt it?[/quote] No, pretty sure a male will provide half the needed genetics to create said life.
[quote]My final point in all this? If you think you should be allowed to limit others rights because of your own beliefs then you should live somewhere that condones such things. Try afghanistan. I hear they have great timeshares and they are all about limiting the rights of women. You would fit right in.[/quote] First of all this is America. I will never leave, even if I have to lay my life down for everyone to remain free. FREE to chose what I want in LIFE! Never have I only used my beliefs in anything but science. If I am believing in some higher power to argue my point, find it please. Place my words in quotes and reference page. You will NEVER find me argue the case for life this way.
So now you want me to go to you for everything? No matter how ignorant and moronic your stand?! Sorry, I use my life experience (something you lack a TON of) and straight foward thinking, logic. Amazingly enough, I have done pretty well even though my life growing up was far from lackluster. However I would never chose death over this life.
Let me know when you would like to spar again. However I think your bruises will scar after being cut so often shrug Your choice though!! See I offer choice to ALL people, something you fail to do when you kill a defenseless child in the womb. Instead you think women should have the option available when she CHOSE a behavior that created said life. How is that ever acceptable? Oh, that is right, it never is!