Pro-Lifer Throws Incendiary Device at PP

[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:
Columbo, YOU are that humanitarian award winner are you not? Can I say that I am honored to have debated with you. The way you ignore my points and insult me by saying that I ‘repeat myself over and over like a broken fucking record’ is humbling and then you ignore the point. Amazing skill set you have. The science you provide about how genetics determining behavior is awesome. You even justify killing children using proven science to back your claims. All I had on my side was logic! What was I thinking in debating with a child of your caliber?!? Seriously, WTF??

[quote]ColumboSteel wrote:
And yes of course [u]I believe killing toddlers whose father is a rapist is fine[/u] because obviously a walking, breathing child is exactly the same as a multi-cellular mass the size of a pencil head. [/quote]
[/quote]

Captain, I’m detecting a faulty sarcasm detector in sector 7.

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
No, because biologically it is not a human.[/quote]

Who are you to dictate this?[/quote]

Who are you to dictate that it isn’t?[/quote]

Classic. You truly are a special kind of retarded.

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
No, because biologically it is not a human.[/quote]

Who are you to dictate this?[/quote]

Who are you to dictate that it isn’t?[/quote]

Classic. You truly are a special kind of retarded.[/quote]

You mean, I don’t make up bullshit on the spot and play off fallacious arguments as worthy of giving time to?

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
No, because biologically it is not a human.[/quote]

Who are you to dictate this?[/quote]

Who are you to dictate that it isn’t?[/quote]

Classic. You truly are a special kind of retarded.[/quote]

You mean, I don’t make up bullshit on the spot and play off fallacious arguments as worthy of giving time to?[/quote]

Except that’s exactly what you did.

Oh Mak, isn’t that what you and Columbo did? Read your above posts if you think otherwise.

LoL

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
No, because biologically it is not a human.[/quote]

Who are you to dictate this?[/quote]

Who are you to dictate that it isn’t?[/quote]

Classic. You truly are a special kind of retarded.[/quote]

You mean, I don’t make up bullshit on the spot and play off fallacious arguments as worthy of giving time to?[/quote]

Except that’s exactly what you did.[/quote]

[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:

  1. Place whom ever you would like there. My mother, my sister, my cousin, my aunts or even my neighbors. The outcome is NOT going to change.

  2. Is the ‘clump of cells’ a person, or a scab? If the answer is a person, I would hope to give life to the person rather than kill them before we can hear their silent screams. If it were a scab, why would you care about one ‘clump of cells’ over the other? I sure wouldn’t worry about some dried blood. Even if it are a ‘clump of cells’.

[quote]ColumboSteel wrote:

[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:
You are going two different, two separate cases.

  1. If it were my sister who became pregnant, I know she was fully aware of the choice to create the life. Instead of throwing the gift away, she would cherish the gift and raise the child to be a productive part of society.

  2. First let me say that I would never wish anything horrible upon anyone, even to my worst enemy. Especially such a horrible and disgusting act such as rape. Yet you have never once told me how a violent act is made better by perpetuating the situation, with an even more violent act. On a defenseless child none the less. Where are the rights of the child?

[quote]ColumboSteel wrote:

[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:
YOU are arguing for the whole [populous vote] to decide the rights of all. I know ALL people deserve their own rights, regardless of what the population believes. Infringement upon the individuals rights are what I have a problem with.

[quote]ColumboSteel wrote:

[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:
Yup, argue for the whole population because that percent of a number is SO large, it doesn’t even total a single whole numerical value.

[quote]ColumboSteel wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Oleena wrote:
choosing not to bring a child into the world.
[/quote]

I’ll stop you right here, there is a very easy and very non-lethal way to do this. If we’re going to act like gods, should we not have the responsibility of gods then?

If you wish not to bring a child into the world, then you should abstain from sex as we know sex leads to making babies. You can throw road blocks in the way, but the road ultimately leads to the same destination with or without road blocks: making babies. If you wish not to reach that destination, then don’t make that turn. Obvious solution is obvious.[/quote]

Excellent post, Chris.

/thread
[/quote]

Yeah, fuck all those woman who get raped and should no longer have a choice. Obvious solution is obvious.[/quote]
[/quote]

Oh so by your logic only those who represent the vast majority deserve rights? [/quote]
[/quote]

You got that completely backwards. I am arguing that EVERYONE should have the RIGHT to decide for themselves. Its called freedom to decide what to do with their own bodies. You on the other hand are wanting to limit those rights. Did you miss that or are you just trying to play word games to make your position seem valid?

How can you say that you believe all people deserve individual rights when you are trying to take someones right to choose away? On that note, who do you think more deserves to have their rights taken away? A women who has already been put in a situation she does not desire, or a couple of cells resting inside her? Im guessing that if this happened to a loved one of yours and she did not desire it that you would not have the balls to fight this hard to stop her, and if you did its too bad she has you in her life and you choose to support those couple of cells rather than her. Think you could tell your sister, mom, aunt, wife or whoever else ‘well fuck you. its too bad you got raped but you have no right to decide what to do with your body anymore. Im making that decision for you’?[/quote]
[/quote]

  1. I said any female you hold dear to you. Again you miss the point. You failed to answer the question yet again. What would you do if…

  2. No one wishes that apon someone, nor did I say you would, but yet again you did not answer a question of mine. Who deserves their rights taken away more? The woman or the clump of cells? One of them is going to lose out and of course you are trying to avoid picking one to make it seem like you are taking the moral high ground. Answer the question.[/quote]
    [/quote]

  3. Are you sure about that? They are not in here to say what they would want so you could be lieing your ass off for all I know and sense it has not happened to one of them, I am assuming, then I dont understand how you can speak for them.

  4. So sense you gave some half assed answer Im going to assume that you value the potential child over that of the women…sad. What if a miscarriage occured? Then you removed someone elses rights all for not. And quite pulling that comparing a born child to the initial conception. Whether you want to admit it on here or not, a small clump of cells is all it is at that time.

[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:
Columbo, YOU are that humanitarian award winner are you not? Can I say that I am honored to have debated with you. The way you ignore my points and insult me by saying that I ‘repeat myself over and over like a broken fucking record’ is humbling and then you ignore the point. Amazing skill set you have. The science you provide about how genetics determining behavior is awesome. You even justify killing children using proven science to back your claims. All I had on my side was logic! What was I thinking in debating with a child of your caliber?!? Seriously, WTF??

[quote]ColumboSteel wrote:
And yes of course [u]I believe killing toddlers whose father is a rapist is fine[/u] because obviously a walking, breathing child is exactly the same as a multi-cellular mass the size of a pencil head. [/quote]
[/quote]

Ignored your points? I have addressed every point you have made and not in a tip toe around the subject matter as you do, and if not then post a point you claim I have missed and ill address it. When you ask the same question over and over when it has already been answered over and over then yes you are a broken record, or some dumbass troll who is just trying to get a rise out of people.

GENETICS DETERMINING BEHAIVIOR?!? Nice straw man there. We were talking about the rights of a woman vs. the rights of a potential child and somehow you pull that out of left field and claim that it somehow was part of the argument. Seriously, sarcasm or not, WTF??

And logic? You have not made a single logical argument yet. You are arguing from emotion. Big difference. I guess, by your “logic”, the rights of a small clump of cells which MAY develope into a child are more important than the rights of a breathing, mature person because…well just because. Very Logical.

Finally if you failed to detect the sarcasm of the killing a child remark, then work on your comprehension abilities. At least my sarcasm is relevant to the actual argument we were having.

Its so easy for people to infringe on the rights of another when the situation in question could never happen to them isnt it?

My final point in all this? If you think you should be allowed to limit others rights because of your own beliefs then you should live somewhere that condones such things. Try afghanistan. I hear they have great timeshares and they are all about limiting the rights of women. You would fit right in.

  1. Who are YOU to tell me what my mother, sister, aunt, cousin or even my girlfriend would say? Oh that is right, I was raised to place others before my immediate gratification. I surround myself with others, like me.

  2. Yes, I value the life over a woman’s choice. Do not forget she partook in an activity where the outcome is always known. Are you trying to argue a case for immediate gratification?

Now you are going for a miscarriage?! Brother Chris we have ANOTHER straw man over here!! So what is the child at conception? This has never once been answered btw.

[quote]ColumboSteel wrote:

[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:

  1. Place whom ever you would like there. My mother, my sister, my cousin, my aunts or even my neighbors. The outcome is NOT going to change.

  2. Is the ‘clump of cells’ a person, or a scab? If the answer is a person, I would hope to give life to the person rather than kill them before we can hear their silent screams. If it were a scab, why would you care about one ‘clump of cells’ over the other? I sure wouldn’t worry about some dried blood. Even if it are a ‘clump of cells’.

[quote]ColumboSteel wrote:

[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:
You are going two different, two separate cases.

  1. If it were my sister who became pregnant, I know she was fully aware of the choice to create the life. Instead of throwing the gift away, she would cherish the gift and raise the child to be a productive part of society.

  2. First let me say that I would never wish anything horrible upon anyone, even to my worst enemy. Especially such a horrible and disgusting act such as rape. Yet you have never once told me how a violent act is made better by perpetuating the situation, with an even more violent act. On a defenseless child none the less. Where are the rights of the child?

[quote]ColumboSteel wrote:

[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:
YOU are arguing for the whole [populous vote] to decide the rights of all. I know ALL people deserve their own rights, regardless of what the population believes. Infringement upon the individuals rights are what I have a problem with.

[quote]ColumboSteel wrote:

[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:
Yup, argue for the whole population because that percent of a number is SO large, it doesn’t even total a single whole numerical value.

[quote]ColumboSteel wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Oleena wrote:
choosing not to bring a child into the world.
[/quote]

I’ll stop you right here, there is a very easy and very non-lethal way to do this. If we’re going to act like gods, should we not have the responsibility of gods then?

If you wish not to bring a child into the world, then you should abstain from sex as we know sex leads to making babies. You can throw road blocks in the way, but the road ultimately leads to the same destination with or without road blocks: making babies. If you wish not to reach that destination, then don’t make that turn. Obvious solution is obvious.[/quote]

Excellent post, Chris.

/thread
[/quote]

Yeah, fuck all those woman who get raped and should no longer have a choice. Obvious solution is obvious.[/quote]
[/quote]

Oh so by your logic only those who represent the vast majority deserve rights? [/quote]
[/quote]

You got that completely backwards. I am arguing that EVERYONE should have the RIGHT to decide for themselves. Its called freedom to decide what to do with their own bodies. You on the other hand are wanting to limit those rights. Did you miss that or are you just trying to play word games to make your position seem valid?

How can you say that you believe all people deserve individual rights when you are trying to take someones right to choose away? On that note, who do you think more deserves to have their rights taken away? A women who has already been put in a situation she does not desire, or a couple of cells resting inside her? Im guessing that if this happened to a loved one of yours and she did not desire it that you would not have the balls to fight this hard to stop her, and if you did its too bad she has you in her life and you choose to support those couple of cells rather than her. Think you could tell your sister, mom, aunt, wife or whoever else ‘well fuck you. its too bad you got raped but you have no right to decide what to do with your body anymore. Im making that decision for you’?[/quote]
[/quote]

  1. I said any female you hold dear to you. Again you miss the point. You failed to answer the question yet again. What would you do if…

  2. No one wishes that apon someone, nor did I say you would, but yet again you did not answer a question of mine. Who deserves their rights taken away more? The woman or the clump of cells? One of them is going to lose out and of course you are trying to avoid picking one to make it seem like you are taking the moral high ground. Answer the question.[/quote]
    [/quote]

  3. Are you sure about that? They are not in here to say what they would want so you could be lieing your ass off for all I know and sense it has not happened to one of them, I am assuming, then I dont understand how you can speak for them.

  4. So sense you gave some half assed answer Im going to assume that you value the potential child over that of the women…sad. What if a miscarriage occured? Then you removed someone elses rights all for not. And quite pulling that comparing a born child to the initial conception. Whether you want to admit it on here or not, a small clump of cells is all it is at that time.[/quote]

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
No, because biologically it is not a human.[/quote]

Who are you to dictate this?[/quote]

Who are you to dictate that it isn’t?[/quote]

Classic. You truly are a special kind of retarded.[/quote]

You mean, I don’t make up bullshit on the spot and play off fallacious arguments as worthy of giving time to?[/quote]

Except that’s exactly what you did.[/quote]

Uh huh.

Find my points you address and place them in BOLD or even UNDERLINE my points, with your rebuttal in “quotes”.

You believe the child created from a rape has the genetic behavior and therefore deserves death. Brother Chris used a term which you do NOT even understand and you try to act like one of the big boys. Please stop now or your immaturity will continue to show itself, again and again.

Here is a perfect example of the ‘straw man’! I argue with emotion. lol

Another portion of the debate -
I use nothing but biology and logic to determine that the difference between yourself and I:

size - we all grow and change as we grow up. Where you this big ten years ago? I am a different size than you, that much I am sure of.

level of development - as people age and grow they develop. I know I am different compared to you.

environment - you are in a different place than myself, Olee or even Brother Chris.

degree of dependency - how much do you depend on your parents still? I no longer depend upon my parents.

The above four traits define the differences between you and I along with every soul on earth. And guess what? The traits even define the unborn. gasp

[quote]ColumboSteel wrote:
Ignored your points? I have addressed every point you have made and not in a tip toe around the subject matter as you do, and if not then post a point you claim I have missed and ill address it. When you ask the same question over and over when it has already been answered over and over then yes you are a broken record, or some dumbass troll who is just trying to get a rise out of people.

GENETICS DETERMINING BEHAIVIOR?!? Nice straw man there. We were talking about the rights of a woman vs. the rights of a potential child and somehow you pull that out of left field and claim that it somehow was part of the argument. Seriously, WTF??

And logic? You have not made a single logical argument yet. You are arguing from emotion. Big difference.[/quote]

Here are two thoughts.

If some scum of the earth murders a pregnant woman guess what our American Justice System charges that scum of the earth with? If you said double homicide then you win the Weider Pro 400 Squat Cage capable of holding 210 lbs. plus 45 lb Olympic bar.

So how can this cockmite be charged with double homicide if what is inside the woman is not human life?

Secondly… if you have to kill it to keep it from growing then it must be LIFE. We go through different body stages but it’s all good. If I were the girl next door, 20 years old blond I would not sleep with Hugh Hefner. But he is still human life, even if he drools & wears depends.

HUMAN LIFE. It’s 2011 we have the technology to witness the miracle that happens inside a woman’s pregnant body. Pictures inside a woman’s belly shows the baby becoming large enough to be seen & at 8 weeks we see arms, legs and major joints forming. Toes and fingers are distinct. HUMAN LIFE it’s all good, even if Hugh Hefner wears depends.

Don’t buy into the lie that it’s not human. For the love of… what did you spill your seed in if it’s not human… http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2011/03/21/sc_man_who_had_sex_with_horse_released_from_prison/

[quote]conservativedog wrote:
Here are two thoughts.

If some scum of the earth murders a pregnant woman guess what our American Justice System charges that scum of the earth with? If you said double homicide then you win the Weider Pro 400 Squat Cage capable of holding 210 lbs. plus 45 lb Olympic bar.

So how can this cockmite be charged with double homicide if what is inside the woman is not human life?

Secondly… if you have to kill it to keep it from growing then it must be LIFE. We go through different body stages but it’s all good. If I were the girl next door, 20 years old blond I would not sleep with Hugh Hefner. But he is still human life, even if he drools & wears depends.

HUMAN LIFE. It’s 2011 we have the technology to witness the miracle that happens inside a woman’s pregnant body. Pictures inside a woman’s belly shows the baby becoming large enough to be seen & at 8 weeks we see arms, legs and major joints forming. Toes and fingers are distinct. HUMAN LIFE it’s all good, even if Hugh Hefner wears depends.

Don’t buy into the lie that it’s not human. For the love of… what did you spill your seed in if it’s not human… http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2011/03/21/sc_man_who_had_sex_with_horse_released_from_prison/
[/quote]

You mean the same justice system that ruled on Roe vs. Wade and that has made abortion legal in this country? Somewhat of a contradiction.

Glad you at least see the contradiction.

Still waiting for you to define: the unborn -

[quote]ColumboSteel wrote:

[quote]conservativedog wrote:
Here are two thoughts.

If some scum of the earth murders a pregnant woman guess what our American Justice System charges that scum of the earth with? If you said double homicide then you win the Weider Pro 400 Squat Cage capable of holding 210 lbs. plus 45 lb Olympic bar.

So how can this cockmite be charged with double homicide if what is inside the woman is not human life?

Secondly… if you have to kill it to keep it from growing then it must be LIFE. We go through different body stages but it’s all good. If I were the girl next door, 20 years old blond I would not sleep with Hugh Hefner. But he is still human life, even if he drools & wears depends.

HUMAN LIFE. It’s 2011 we have the technology to witness the miracle that happens inside a woman’s pregnant body. Pictures inside a woman’s belly shows the baby becoming large enough to be seen & at 8 weeks we see arms, legs and major joints forming. Toes and fingers are distinct. HUMAN LIFE it’s all good, even if Hugh Hefner wears depends.

Don’t buy into the lie that it’s not human. For the love of… what did you spill your seed in if it’s not human… http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2011/03/21/sc_man_who_had_sex_with_horse_released_from_prison/
[/quote]

You mean the same justice system that ruled on Roe vs. Wade and that has made abortion legal in this country? Somewhat of a contradiction. [/quote]

[quote]Oleena wrote:

However, not everyone is born with the same amount of self control. [/quote]

I don’t fucking believe this. No way in hell do I believe that. This has nothing to do with abortion, I mean I don’t consider that a valid argument for ANYTHING. That’s the biggest of all fucking cop-outs ever.

[quote]ColumboSteel wrote:

[quote]conservativedog wrote:
Here are two thoughts.

If some scum of the earth murders a pregnant woman guess what our American Justice System charges that scum of the earth with? If you said double homicide then you win the Weider Pro 400 Squat Cage capable of holding 210 lbs. plus 45 lb Olympic bar.

So how can this cockmite be charged with double homicide if what is inside the woman is not human life?

Secondly… if you have to kill it to keep it from growing then it must be LIFE. We go through different body stages but it’s all good. If I were the girl next door, 20 years old blond I would not sleep with Hugh Hefner. But he is still human life, even if he drools & wears depends.

HUMAN LIFE. It’s 2011 we have the technology to witness the miracle that happens inside a woman’s pregnant body. Pictures inside a woman’s belly shows the baby becoming large enough to be seen & at 8 weeks we see arms, legs and major joints forming. Toes and fingers are distinct. HUMAN LIFE it’s all good, even if Hugh Hefner wears depends.

Don’t buy into the lie that it’s not human. For the love of… what did you spill your seed in if it’s not human… http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2011/03/21/sc_man_who_had_sex_with_horse_released_from_prison/
[/quote]

You mean the same justice system that ruled on Roe vs. Wade and that has made abortion legal in this country? Somewhat of a contradiction. [/quote]

Yes, that is Precisely his point. Also, I completely agree with his point about life. We can debate all we want on whether a zygote, embryo, or fetus is a person. And we can debate all we want whether or not said zygote, embryo, or fetus is a form of life that deserves protection under the law. But please don’t be spouting off nonsense that it’s not human or not alive/“life”.

I think everybody here gets that already, and we’re just getting a little loose with the language in the heat of debate, but that little piece of ignorance drives me absolutely up a wall when I see it. There is zero scientific grounds for denying those two pieces of information.

[quote]Aragorn wrote:

[quote]ColumboSteel wrote:

[quote]conservativedog wrote:
Here are two thoughts.

If some scum of the earth murders a pregnant woman guess what our American Justice System charges that scum of the earth with? If you said double homicide then you win the Weider Pro 400 Squat Cage capable of holding 210 lbs. plus 45 lb Olympic bar.

So how can this cockmite be charged with double homicide if what is inside the woman is not human life?

Secondly… if you have to kill it to keep it from growing then it must be LIFE. We go through different body stages but it’s all good. If I were the girl next door, 20 years old blond I would not sleep with Hugh Hefner. But he is still human life, even if he drools & wears depends.

HUMAN LIFE. It’s 2011 we have the technology to witness the miracle that happens inside a woman’s pregnant body. Pictures inside a woman’s belly shows the baby becoming large enough to be seen & at 8 weeks we see arms, legs and major joints forming. Toes and fingers are distinct. HUMAN LIFE it’s all good, even if Hugh Hefner wears depends.

Don’t buy into the lie that it’s not human. For the love of… what did you spill your seed in if it’s not human… http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2011/03/21/sc_man_who_had_sex_with_horse_released_from_prison/
[/quote]

You mean the same justice system that ruled on Roe vs. Wade and that has made abortion legal in this country? Somewhat of a contradiction. [/quote]

Yes, that is Precisely his point. Also, I completely agree with his point about life. We can debate all we want on whether a zygote, embryo, or fetus is a person. And we can debate all we want whether or not said zygote, embryo, or fetus is a form of life that deserves protection under the law. But please don’t be spouting off nonsense that it’s not human or not alive/“life”.

I think everybody here gets that already, and we’re just getting a little loose with the language in the heat of debate, but that little piece of ignorance drives me absolutely up a wall when I see it. There is zero scientific grounds for denying those two pieces of information.[/quote]

And when I hear people spouting off about how they feel they can limit the rights of others…well as you said, that little piece of ignorance drives me absolutely up a wall. I think we need a few more t-vixens in hear to see how they feel about someone telling them what they can and cant do with their bodies.

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

Actually, I don’t. I argue that they shouldn’t kill innocent children just because they lack self-control.
[/quote]

So you admit that some people are born with far less self-control than others, and yet hold everyone to the same standard of free will? How does that work?

[quote]Aragorn wrote:

[quote]Oleena wrote:

However, not everyone is born with the same amount of self control. [/quote]

I don’t fucking believe this. No way in hell do I believe that. This has nothing to do with abortion, I mean I don’t consider that a valid argument for ANYTHING. That’s the biggest of all fucking cop-outs ever.[/quote]

So you honestly believe a retard, a person with schizophrenia, borderline personality, reactive attachment disorder, or true bi-polar 1 has the same amount of self control as you do?

It’s not a cop-out, it’s a logical response to the argument I see thrown up every two seconds, which is: if they don’t want to make kids, they could not have sex. I am saying, some people honestly don’t have the self-control not to have sex, including people from all of the categories listed above, which you’d be pretty hard-pressed to say, as adults, have anywhere near as much self control as normal children. So the argument that “they could choose not to have sex” is not valid in a scarily high number of situations.

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]

[b] When the body consciously does this (as in the case of messed up genes such or unfavorable conditions in the middle of pregnancy), is it committing a crime, or is it furthering it and it’s offspring’s survival for the good of the species? [/b][/quote]

You again are bring up fallacious arguments, straw man to be exact. I’m not talking about miscarriage which is not the same as a willful termination of an unborn baby.[/quote]

I’m guessing that the reason why you don’t see the similarity between these two things is that you believe God is controlling the body’s ability to abort, but he isn’t controlling the human’s choice to abort?

[quote]Oleena wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

Does not have to be this way, just because some people accidentally drown does not mean that you can drown them.