[quote]Massif wrote:
Anybody saying they wouldn’t fuck the moo-butter out of that chick is either lying or gay. Most of you would be so stunned that she was even talking to you that you would quite possibly cum in your pants.[/quote]
I think she’s a victim of bad camera angles. The rear shot is her most flattering, because you can tell that her arms aren’s as skinny as they looked in the Powerful Image.
I like her flat tummy. Just like 90% of the world’s women, “I’d hit her” if I had the chance.
What I find amazing is the amount of scrutiny the woman is getting. She’s hot, (insert everything you’d like to do to her here), and that should be enough. Right? Why does everyone try so hard to convince others/themselves of that?
[quote]wufwugy wrote:
BGB wrote:
I was going to post my competition pics afterwards but some of your responses make me think that I’ll just get ripped apart!!!
actually, if you’re at least remotely attractive you’ll get praise. if you’re more than remotely attractive you’ll get ‘OMG, yur SOOOO hawt’ and such.
seems there’s some hypocrisy when actual female posters put up pics compared to TC’s images.[/quote]
Very true. Very weird discrepancy that usually goes on.
[quote]BIGRAGOO wrote:
What I find amazing is the amount of scrutiny the woman is getting. She’s hot, (insert everything you’d like to do to her here), and that should be enough. Right? Why does everyone try so hard to convince others/themselves of that?[/quote]
The reason I commented on this one is because the Wed. images are usually some type of athletic female. The Friday is usually the cheesecake image.
Since this is a Wed. image I expected an athletic girl, not a borderline anorexic hot chick.
[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
BIGRAGOO wrote:
What I find amazing is the amount of scrutiny the woman is getting. She’s hot, (insert everything you’d like to do to her here), and that should be enough. Right? Why does everyone try so hard to convince others/themselves of that?
The reason I commented on this one is because the Wed. images are usually some type of athletic female. The Friday is usually the cheesecake image.
Since this is a Wed. image I expected an athletic girl, not a borderline anorexic hot chick.
[/quote]
Still, it made it’s point. It is powerful enough to get this thread and all these posts. Job done.
[quote]Panther1015 wrote:
Some of the critiquing over these babes is borderline homo (not that there’s anything wrong with that). I’m personally into brunettes with athletic builds, a nice round ass, toned legs and C-cup titties (think Jessica Alba’s body as a frame of reference). With that said, I’ve been turned on by women across the spectrum, from slightly chunky to down right skinny and everything in between. Women kick ass. They don’t have to be built like an Amazon queen to be hot. [/quote]
Hey I never said she was not hot…just that she didn’t look like she worked out. There is a difference…I remember plenty of hotties in college who never saw the inside of a gym but were good to go. You can’t honestly tell me that this girl couldn’t get that look by just watching what she ate?
[quote]Massif wrote:
mindeffer01 wrote:
Obligatory “I’d hit it” aside, she does appear to have a severe forward rotation of the hips. I’m sure folding her up like a pretzel and hittin it like a crazy monkey boy would fix that right up though. It’s worth a shot anyways.
Jesus Christ - you are obsessed with that shit. Ever think she might be sticking her ass out a bit for the camera???[/quote]
That did occur to me, but I would rather err’ on the side of caution. If we don’t band together to end needless suffering- The Terrorists will have won!(sobsob, tear rolls down cheek)
[quote]jacross wrote:
asianbabe wrote:
If she had a few more pounds of fat, I’m sure no one would be saying she looked anorexic.
…I don’t think that is as profound as you thought it was going to be.[/quote]
I meant like 5 pounds of fat… or implants… Funny how as soon as a skinny chick gets implants she’s no longer seen as anorexic - I wouldn’t say she’s any skinnier than Pamela Anderson. Anyhoo, yeah, I think I was having one of those moments when I wrote that.
[quote]asianbabe wrote:
jacross wrote:
asianbabe wrote:
If she had a few more pounds of fat, I’m sure no one would be saying she looked anorexic.
…I don’t think that is as profound as you thought it was going to be.
I meant like 5 pounds of fat… or implants… Funny how as soon as a skinny chick gets implants she’s no longer seen as anorexic - I wouldn’t say she’s any skinnier than Pamela Anderson. Anyhoo, yeah, I think I was having one of those moments when I wrote that. [/quote]
Then she would look like a borderline anorexic with implants. I think she looks far skinnier than Pam Anderson and Pam is about as skinny as a woman should get.
Perhaps somebody could find some good pics so we can compare.
Many peoples perceptions of the ideal female body type have been screwed up badly by TV, movies, modeling, plastic surgery etc.
I hope you do not try to emulate these actressess and models that have eating disorders.
This woman is supposed to be a fitness competitor/model and you can see her ribs, her hipbones are sticking out and she has no abdominal definition. Something is wrong. She is a pretty girl, but she would look much better if she would eat.
Zap reminds me of the high school kids who play world of warcraft arguing over which class should get which dagger. It’s like he’s arguing anorexia just to piss people off.
You said you’d hit it. Therefore she looks good enough for you.
I don’t think you would beat it up Zap, and I don’t think I’m the only one here who thinks so. I hate people who critique other people like that, Especially wearing those shorts in that avie. That guy looks like Jessica Simpsons stunt double, lol. The bottom line is this bitch is better lookin than any woman YOU’VE EVER been with or WILL EVER be with, and I’ll go ahead and bet the farm on it.
Wow, you people are obtuse. Try to make some observations that the powerful image that is supposed to be the athletic girl of the weak looks more anorexic than athletic and I get a bunch of junior high school responses.
For some reason I expected more from people that visit a site that dedicates itself to building strength, muscle and athleticism.
For the person that wants to see a pic of my wife, my wife is a beautiful woman, a college professor with multiple degrees in Biology, in the midst of picking up another Masters degree, maintains an overloaded teaching schedule and helps me raise my two beautiful young daughters.
She was also a hell of a good soccer player back in the day.
I am not posting a picture of her so you can critique her and compare her to a picture of some chick that looks like she has an eating disorder.
If you want to delude yourself that having no muscle and and so little bodyfat that your ribs and hipbones that are plainly visible is the feminine ideal, then I feel sorry for you.
I’m not sure how many people are registered on here, but I’m sure its alot. I’m not saying she’s hotter than every hooters waitress someone has a picture with. I’m just saying Zaps high standards are the reason why I give guys like Kyle Maynard so much respect. I weigh 160, I weighed 138 8 months ago. I’ve busted my ass for every pound I’ve gained, and I’m working on it. I eat like a motherfucker but I burn alot of cals during the day. I can’t help it, its just the way I am.
Zap wrote:
If you want to delude yourself that having no muscle and and so little bodyfat that your ribs and hipbones that are plainly visible is the feminine ideal, then I feel sorry for you.