Ain’t this Erica Davidson in Powerful Images?
Yes it is! Isn’t she just the picture perfect image of what a T-vixen defined is?
Alas, I cry myself asleep every night knowing she is married…
Gawd, her body is phenom. Maybe a bit of a butterface though. But shit, better than anything my married ass will ever be with.
Am I alone here or does her head look like it was photoshoped in the powerful image? I’m not suggesting it actually was, as the add’l pics in this thread prove that, but the powerful image looks really fake for some reason.
[quote]Zell959 wrote:
Am I alone here or does her head look like it was photoshoped in the powerful image? I’m not suggesting it actually was, as the add’l pics in this thread prove that, but the powerful image looks really fake for some reason.[/quote]
Bad lighting, or someone botched his Photoshop dodge & burn retouches.
She looks fantastic! Totally what I aspire to become.
And my husband is QUITE happy with that goal! Of course, it would mean a palstic surgeon, a tan, and bottled blonde hair, but whatever! The body is personally attainable. 
OMFG
What’s wrong with her face? None of the photos look right…as if they were all doctored in Photoshop.
Or maybe she’s used a little “assistance” in the past and it caused for slight changes that now require some serious makeup or Photoshop to overcome.
http://images.t-nation.com/forum_images/./1/.1117920296050.DSC00757.jpg
Nate… man you’re harsh.
The photos do look crooked probably because they’ve been resized by some software (like many powerful images are).
Here, 2 close up photos of Erica taken at the Olympia just last year. I have scaled them down properly (hope they come out ok), and they have NOT been Photoshoped, trust me on that one.
Now if that don’t look right to you, I can tell you right now that we’d get along very well hunting women.
http://images.t-nation.com/forum_images/./1/.1117920356210.DSC00758.jpg
here’s the other one.
Those are better. But she doesn’t have the greatest face (not for my tastes). But her body is un-fuckin’-believable!
Ultimately, I wouldn’t mind having a body like this chick. It looks like she naturally doesn’t carry much fat on her stomach coupled with hard work. Thus, I think if my arms and legs were to look like hers, you couldn’t see the individual striations since I tend to store a lot of fat here. I’d be happy with the very defined “vertical” lines as I call them. Does anyone know her stats? Particularly her body fat in these pics? Thanks
Right-click, “view image”, click on the picture to blow it up to original size.
Re-sizing for forums always makes pictures look like shit.
[quote]Nate Dogg wrote:
Those are better. But she doesn’t have the greatest face (not for my tastes). But her body is un-fuckin’-believable![/quote]
I agree with you on that. The two head shots look better than the other body shots, but I have to say, if she didn’t have that body I wouldn’t give her a second glance if I saw her in public.
Great: one other guy out of the way.
[quote]Tizzah wrote:
Nate Dogg wrote:
Those are better. But she doesn’t have the greatest face (not for my tastes). But her body is un-fuckin’-believable!
I agree with you on that. The two head shots look better than the other body shots, but I have to say, if she didn’t have that body I wouldn’t give her a second glance if I saw her in public.[/quote]
Geez you guys must have plenty of beutiful woman where you live, I live near the Gold Coast in Australia and she is one girl I would rate up there with anyone ive ever seen. Maybe I am blinded by the fantastic body but as my mentor always said, “you don’t fuck their face”.
D
[quote]deadly69 wrote:
Maybe I am blinded by the fantastic body but as my mentor always said, “you don’t fuck their face”.
D[/quote]
If you’re doing a Deadly69 you do.
Make her a redhead, and improve her face a little, and she WOULD be the perfect T-Vixen.